|
Post by stefano on Sept 23, 2019 9:13:19 GMT
What will happen if a second referendum is held and the original result is repeated? Will there ever be an end to this flagrant attempt to overrule a democratic process? The quick answer is...the Remoaners will then demand a best of five! No need for that as it is currently 1-1 in referendums as to whether to remain in the European dream so best of 3 is absolutely fine! I am old enough to have voted in both and remained consistent in my approach not being easily taken in by fraudsters. It is no wonder there are so many successful scams operating with over 17 million as gullible targets.....
|
|
|
Post by stefano on Sept 23, 2019 13:30:14 GMT
Not really, Stefano. The first referendum was whether to stay in the common market, a trading arrangement. The second one was whether to stay in the European Union, which by then had a parliament, its own laws, a flag, an anthem and its own currency; which was a completely different kettle of fish. It is the same thing as one has evolved out of the other. The UK was involved throughout in that evolution. All this nonsense about being dictated to by Brussels is ridiculous and part of the deceitful spin to fool the gullible (successfully I might add!). The UK are part of the EU so we have been making these laws in partnership. Still I don't suppose it actually matters where laws are made anymore as we appear to have a PM who doesn't intend to obey the law in any case!
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Sept 23, 2019 21:50:14 GMT
1 all best of three seems fair, though. The third one will be different again as Project Bullshit won’t be able to get away with so many lies.(eg: the easiest deal in history with us holding all the cards.) Win win. I think stefano is onto something there.
|
|
|
Post by stewart on Sept 24, 2019 0:18:33 GMT
The quick answer is...the Remoaners will then demand a best of five! No need for that as it is currently 1-1 in referendums as to whether to remain in the European dream so best of 3 is absolutely fine! I am old enough to have voted in both and remained consistent in my approach not being easily taken in by fraudsters. It is no wonder there are so many successful scams operating with over 17 million as gullible targets..... It really is quite insulting to describe people as "gullible targets". It's tantamount to saying that they were too stupid or weak minded to realise what they were voting for, and that they listened to propaganda rather than exercised their own judgments. After all, it is far easier and safer to take a stance which supports the status quo rather than any departure from it, so it is quite feasible to say that the 16.1 million were equally gullible and stupid. Here's something else for you to ponder on. If an anti-democratic second referendum does eventually take place, then the public has every right to be offered all of the options, including "no deal", and not just "with a deal" or "remain". The politicians, who number a tiny proportion of the population, have already decided that this option should be "taken off the table", but what right have they to do so when they have no idea how people were thinking when the original votes were cast? If there is to be another referendum, heaven forbid, then the public should at least be able to choose the best way out of this disunified union without being misguided, ignored or treated with contempt by politicians whose main aim is to obstruct the democratic will of the people whom they purport to represent.
|
|
|
Post by stefano on Sept 24, 2019 8:05:56 GMT
It really is quite insulting to describe people as "gullible targets". Bloody snowflake!
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Sept 24, 2019 11:19:16 GMT
Johnson misled Queen and acted unlawfully. Unlikely to resign over lie as he would have had to resign most days since he’s been in office were that the litmus test.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2019 14:01:56 GMT
Johnson misled Queen and acted unlawfully. Unlikely to resign over lie as he would have had to resign most days since he’s been in office were that the litmus test. With all these lies Boris is telling, he'll make a great PM! He'll have to go somewhat though to beat the master of lies...Blair!
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Sept 24, 2019 16:35:57 GMT
Project Bullshit lies.(eg: the easiest deal in history with us holding all the cards.) Are you a Brexiteer or Remainer, Rob? In parliamentary tradition, I refer the Honourable Flo to the answer I gave some moments ago.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2019 8:34:57 GMT
Bye... Attachments:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 20, 2019 16:50:54 GMT
What's happened to all the protagonists in this melodrama?
The last post on this thread was two weeks ago.
What's happened to AJ at this crucial time?
I guess everyone in the country is bored shitless with Brexit, so why not members of this site!
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Oct 20, 2019 17:35:21 GMT
Farridge doesn’t want this deal as he sees it as May’s Chequers deal reheated. AJ apparently disagrees with Farridge. I have gleaned that from elsewhere. There you go.
|
|
|
Post by stewart on Oct 20, 2019 22:35:19 GMT
I was wondering myself what had happened to all the views on this topic, so I'm pleased that people are talking again, and no, I am not bored shitless with it. In fact, as someone who said goodbye to work a decade ago, I watch the BBC Parliament programme every day without fail. I am particularly keen to listen to, and laugh at, the views of the LibDems, who want Brexit cancelled altogether, and others like Anna Soubry, who illogically want another people's vote.
If I could, I would ask Anna Soubry what precisely she would want the options on the ballot paper to be. Does anyone on here have any ideas? Would they be either (a) Remain, (b) Leave with Boris Johnson's deal, or (c) something else? The problem with that is very few members of the public would know what this deal consists of, and even they would not understand it, so what would be the point?
As for Rob's last comment, when talking about Nigel Farage, why do you persist in deliberately mis-spelling his name? I am well aware that you despise both him and his philosophies, but you could at least show a little respect for someone who always speaks the truth, unlike the vast majority of politicians.
|
|
|
Post by stefano on Oct 21, 2019 0:19:57 GMT
If I could, I would ask Anna Soubry what precisely she would want the options on the ballot paper to be. Does anyone on here have any ideas? Would they be either (a) Remain, (b) Leave with Boris Johnson's deal, or (c) something else? The problem with that is very few members of the public would know what this deal consists of, and even they would not understand it, so what would be the point? As for Rob's last comment, when talking about Nigel Farage, why do you persist in deliberately mis-spelling his name? I am well aware that you despise both him and his philosophies, but you could at least show a little respect for someone who always speaks the truth, unlike the vast majority of politicians. A number of interesting points. Questions on the referendum which will without doubt take place. Well there can only really be two can't there? (1) Remain; (2) Remain; (3) Remain. The public not understanding what the deal actually is if unlike me the government offered it as an option. Well that is bloody hilarious, as that is why we are in this position in the first place. Mind you I would say that every leave voter I have ever come across has immediately said "I knew exactly what I was voting for." There is a very old and absolutely true saying, "I think he protests too much". If the cap fits wear it. Well the third one the only comment to make is that anybody who respects Mr Nigel Farage as a serious politician should have their right to vote withdrawn by Royal decree. So please hand in your postal voting slip and bus pass together with two forms of identification at the nearest police station you can find open tomorrow morning Stewart.....
|
|
|
Post by stewart on Oct 21, 2019 1:14:40 GMT
If I could, I would ask Anna Soubry what precisely she would want the options on the ballot paper to be. Does anyone on here have any ideas? Would they be either (a) Remain, (b) Leave with Boris Johnson's deal, or (c) something else? The problem with that is very few members of the public would know what this deal consists of, and even they would not understand it, so what would be the point? As for Rob's last comment, when talking about Nigel Farage, why do you persist in deliberately mis-spelling his name? I am well aware that you despise both him and his philosophies, but you could at least show a little respect for someone who always speaks the truth, unlike the vast majority of politicians. A number of interesting points. Questions on the referendum which will without doubt take place. Well there can only really be two can't there? (1) Remain; (2) Remain; (3) Remain. The public not understanding what the deal actually is if unlike me the government offered it as an option. Well that is bloody hilarious, as that is why we are in this position in the first place. Mind you I would say that every leave voter I have ever come across has immediately said "I knew exactly what I was voting for." There is a very old and absolutely true saying, "I think he protests too much". If the cap fits wear it. Well the third one the only comment to make is that anybody who respects Mr Nigel Farage as a serious politician should have their right to vote withdrawn by Royal decree. So please hand in your postal voting slip and bus pass together with two forms of identification at the nearest police station you can find open tomorrow morning Stewart..... You're a funny man. I won't claim that I knew exactly what I was voting for, except to say that freedom of movement and paying billions into a Brussels bank account did influence me to a large extent. However, as an obvious remain devotee, did you know exactly what you were voting for? I have never regarded Nigel Farage as a politician, rather as an intelligent man who, as I have said, invariably answers questions truthfully and honestly. I should be very interested to know which of the current politicians you do respect. Jeremy Corbyn? John McDonnell? Oh, of course, Jo Swinson and Caroline Lucas, who are doing their best to overturn a democratic decision. However, if it's of any consolation to you, I don't like Boris Johnson either, in fact I can't stand the sight of his smirking face. He is the very last person who should be leading this democratic process. As for handing in my postal voting slip and my bus pass, I really haven't a clue what you are talking about. Are you suggesting that I am a geriatric idiot?
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,217
|
Post by rjdgull on Oct 21, 2019 6:23:28 GMT
Are you suggesting that I am a geriatric idiot? Wouldn’t even cross my mind 😀 However, even if you are, the reforms of the C19 and early C20 make this irrelevant in respect of the voting requirement. I do worry when democracy is not respected and where this could ultimately lead us? “No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all the other forms which have been tried from time to time.” W. Churchill 11 November 1947
|
|