Rags
TFF member
Posts: 1,210
|
Post by Rags on Sept 30, 2012 11:37:04 GMT
So does having sex with your mistress whilst she wears a football shirt mean a loss of credibility? Oh dear, in that case... Erm....... it was Mellor wearing the Chelsea shirt not the mistress, Antonia de Sancha. Although there is more than enough evidence on the web that the football shirt element was complete fabrication made up to sell the story. Both Max Clifford and Alistair Campbell have claimed to have invented that detail, given their history there's no guarantee that they aren't telling the truth with this claim either.
|
|
JamesB
TFF member
Posts: 1,526
|
Post by JamesB on Sept 30, 2012 12:22:58 GMT
So does having sex with your mistress whilst she wears a football shirt mean a loss of credibility? Oh dear, in that case... More the point that it's not particularly surprising to see one Chelsea-supporting adulterer defend another (the adultery point is a bit irrelevant but it makes for a good line). And the fact that he has no credibility generally On the subject of Wildebeeste's encounter and the lack of response from others, this is an interesting read: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitty_Genovese
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Sept 30, 2012 12:36:16 GMT
The problem with these people is that you can't have a rational conversation with them. When someone is at the point of using racial abuse to intimidate or insult someone, debate and logic don't work, the only response is to intimidate back. That's not always easy if you're on your own, or if the group is a big one. One of the most uncomfortable things I've witnessed was on a train from Rochdale into Manchester. There were a large group of pissed up blokes in their 30s and 40s (Rochdale fans on their way to see their team at Bury), and they were chanting racist songs and generally acting like filth. But then they spotted a blind woman and thought it would be a good idea to sing some songs about her disability. Everyone on the carriage felt uncomfortable but nobody did anything. To this day I feel guilty that I let that woman take the abuse rather than stand up to them and risk the probably inevitable physical confrontation.
I don't think there's anything wrong ethically with shopping people to stewards, but to me it's the wrong approach. The way you beat these people isn't to hand responsibility over to the authorities to deal with it, but to force them to understand that their behaviour will have consequences from the people around them. Now in your experience yesterday, Wildebeeste it would seem that you didn't recieve that backup. I would guess though that one of the reasons you didn't is that the people around you thought "it's the steward’s jobs to look after that kind of thing". But IT ISN'T, it's all of our jobs to look after that kind of thing.
Their numbers may be small, but racist and fascist groups haven't disappeared. There are groups of people who think its a good idea to march through other people's neighbourhoods and towns intimidating the local population with a show of force and a mentality similar to that of the Rochdale fans on their way to Bury. You don't beat or stop these people by asking the police to make arrests if they make racist chants, you beat them by confronting them, refusing to let them through, and making them unwelcome. That takes work, organising and effort, but it's the only way.
|
|
Rags
TFF member
Posts: 1,210
|
Post by Rags on Sept 30, 2012 15:41:12 GMT
Well, well! I read Harlan Ellison's The Whimper of Whipped Dogs back in the mid-80's, which is the first time I had ever heard of this event. It was not long afterwards that I read a story in the local paper of a person going to the assistance of a woman being attacked on Ealing Common (I lived in Ealing at the time). As it turned out, the woman and her "attacker" were actually a team and the would-be samaritan was brutally attacked and robbed; if I remember correctly he was in hospital for a week recovering from his injuries. I've never forgotten these "two sides to a story" and neither have I ever managed to work out what I would do if I ever found myself in such a situation. Safety first or offer help but run the risk I might suffer serious injury. I really don't know.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2012 15:58:52 GMT
It is difficult, Rags. When I challenged the bloke on the train I did what I've done in similar situations in recent years . I did a "risk assessment" and decided it was in my favour. I did likewise with another type of incident on a train between Southampton and Salisbury a year or two back.
So I'm not sure if that's brave or actually rather cowardly. When I used to travel back to Exeter after Plainmoor home games I regularly encountered a group of big, boorish pissheads from Teignmouth heading to Exeter for the evening. I'm afraid I never fancied challenging them.
|
|
|
Post by gullone on Sept 30, 2012 16:09:01 GMT
Not sure if Wildebeeste was sat with the Torquay fans yesterday and in all due respect IT IS up to the stewards to deal with those situations. Maybe people around you were engrossed in the game and not taking the slightest bit of notice of two guys having a slanging match, why should they? You may have been travelling for hours and paid good money to get in so the last thing on your mind is getting involved with some arsehole and both being escorted out. In future i would suggest immediately having a quiet word with a steward.......just a thought. Anyway keep up your good posts they make enjoyable reading.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2012 16:10:50 GMT
Thanks, gullone. I wasn't sat with the Torquay fans but I wish I had been.
Next time...................
|
|
Rags
TFF member
Posts: 1,210
|
Post by Rags on Sept 30, 2012 16:30:46 GMT
And some more relevant information! " The bystander effect or Genovese syndrome is a social psychological phenomenon that refers to cases where individuals do not offer any means of help in an emergency situation to the victim when other people are present. The probability of help has often appeared to be inversely related to the number of bystanders; in other words, the greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that any one of them will help. The mere presence of other bystanders greatly decreases intervention. In general, this is believed to happen because as the number of bystanders increases, any given bystander is less likely to notice the situation, interpret the incident as a problem, and less likely to assume responsibility for taking action." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bystander_effectHey, it's Wikipedia so does need some amount of cross-checking, but that is very interesting if its true.
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Sept 30, 2012 16:32:05 GMT
Not sure if Wildebeeste was sat with the Torquay fans yesterday and in all due respect IT IS up to the stewards to deal with those situations. Maybe people around you were engrossed in the game and not taking the slightest bit of notice of two guys having a slanging match, why should they? You may have been travelling for hours and paid good money to get in so the last thing on your mind is getting involved with some arsehole and both being escorted out. In future i would suggest immediately having a quiet word with a steward.......just a thought. Anyway keep up your good posts they make enjoyable reading. How far do you want to take that line of argument? Paid your train fare, so it's up to the Guard to sort the viscous racist scumbag who's laying into a couple minding their own business? Got errands to run, so it's the policeman's job to sort the youth who's giving the old woman at the bus stop a load of foul abuse? Paid nearly £4 for a pint, so it's up to the other bar staff to sort the racist who's decided he doesn't think people should be allowed to serve him? Yes, it is the job of a stewards to deal with these incidents, but it's also the responsibility of all of us. Well done, Wildebeeste, btw for making your brave stand. Shame on the people who didn't offer you support.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2012 16:34:33 GMT
Thanks, gullone. I wasn't sat with the Torquay fans but I wish I had been. Next time................... You're cordially invited to York City v Torquay United on 24 November.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2012 7:04:52 GMT
That's a kind offer BD, and if I am in the North I shall gladly accept.
By November I shall probably be getting over my divorce from the Spireites and be ready to develop my relationship with the Gulls. Besides, Goody Wildebeeste loves York, especially at those rare times when when it's not under water.
Lambeth Gull makes some interesting arguments but I actually took the action that supporters are recommended to take by going to the stewards, and I did give the moron a warning first. His response was to threaten me with violence (Me and thee! Outside!) which was an empty threat, obviously, but one made out of bravado in front of the blokes he thinks of as his mates and who no doubt felt some obligation to him.
If I had started fighting with him after he cuffed me from behind I should have been ejected from the ground myself, would have frightened the other people around us (including a woman with learning difficulties who had already asked the testoterone boys to mind their language and been told to eff off) and most importantly of all would have descended to his level. There is an argument that racism should be met with a robust physical response (and on Saturday afternoon I expect the EDL thickos who turned up in Walsall encountered a strong counter-demonstration) but a football stand isn't the place for that.
As an aside, having spent the last two years watching from seats rather than standing, my experience is that there is more likelihood of a violent argument taking place in an all-seater environment than on a standing terrace where people can move around relatively freely. Had the home end on Saturday been a standing Kop my own incident would not have happened because I'd have gone and stood somewhere else in the first 10 minutes in order to get away from the swearing and shouting. I reckon that the feeling of being trapped in a particular seat causes stress and leads people to become territorial and bad tempered. There is a definite tendency for men of a certain age and haircut to adopt an attitude of This is where I sit. This is how I behave. What you gonna do about it?
This is, of course, the opposite hypothesis to the accepted one which is that giving people seats makes them less likely to fight.
Saturday's match wasn't a bad one and yet the anger on the home end began in the first minute and just got worse with every mistake by a Chesterfield player and every tackle by Torquay. In contrast, the Gulls v Argyle game was pretty poor and yet on the Popular Side I heard none of the rage which is always rife at a Spireites match. There may be other reasons why this should be so but I do think the Torquay supporters' ability to move their arms and legs and take a walk has something to do with it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2012 8:50:47 GMT
If you can make it to York, Wildebeeste, I'm sure you may bump into one or two others from this forum.
Getting stuck in an all-seated section with people who get on my wick is one of life's little concerns. Just imagine having a season ticket which opens up that delight.
What to tolerate at football - or not - is occasionally a dilemma. There's things we accept as "part of the game" that we may feel less comfortable with away from football. There may even be odd bits of "naughtiness" that we rather enjoy because the rest of our lives are rather more restrained. But I don't buy into some of the "it's a football match, what do you expect?" stuff. And, I suspect, there may have been a few people around Wildebeeste on Saturday who would have taken that line.
Interesting too what Wildebeeste says about the angry nature of the Chesterfield crowd on Saturday. I think that can be a case of swings and roundabouts. We may moan about the lack of passion or fervour at Plainmoor. But with passion and fervour, there's often an increased possibility of aggressive anger and hatred. Yes, there's some anger - and occasional signs of hatred - at Plainmoor if things aren't going well or we're up against somebody we don't like. But, compared to many other grounds, I'm prone to file the atmosphere - when downbeat - under the headings of "sullen" and "miserable" rather than raging. I'd also say we "dislike" rather than "hate" even to the extent of our local derbies being, in comparative terms, rather tepid affairs.
Not that I'm actively promoting hate or anger you must understand. Far from it. But if Wildebeeste's destiny takes him towards more games at Plainmoor - plus the occasional away excursion - I'm sure we'll be pleased to hear more of his sociological insights and comparisons.
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Oct 1, 2012 14:53:45 GMT
I actually took the action that supporters are recommended to take by going to the stewards, and I did give the moron a warning first. His response was to threaten me with violence (Me and thee! Outside!) which was an empty threat, obviously, but one made out of bravado in front of the blokes he thinks of as his mates and who no doubt felt some obligation to him. the Torquay supporters' ability to move their arms and legs and take a walk has something to do with it. To be clear, I wasn't saying that nobody should ever go to the stewards (nor that stewards shouldn't have the power to eject people from the ground). What I meant was that it shouldn't be left to the stewards to police the behaviour of racists. If someone is behaving like that then the people around them have a responsibility to challenge and confront them. That way, they get the message that their behaviour is unacceptable instead of it being a simple matter of them breaking a regulation and being mechanically removed from the ground. Barton Downs made the point earlier that the guy on his train thought it was acceptable to use racist language because John Terry was acquitted by the court. That's the problem with leaving these things to the 'powers that be' - some people think the problem is getting caught, not the behaviour or views themselves.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Oct 1, 2012 19:14:49 GMT
I actually took the action that supporters are recommended to take by going to the stewards, and I did give the moron a warning first. His response was to threaten me with violence (Me and thee! Outside!) which was an empty threat, obviously, but one made out of bravado in front of the blokes he thinks of as his mates and who no doubt felt some obligation to him. the Torquay supporters' ability to move their arms and legs and take a walk has something to do with it. To be clear, I wasn't saying that nobody should ever go to the stewards (nor that stewards shouldn't have the power to eject people from the ground). What I meant was that it shouldn't be left to the stewards to police the behaviour of racists. If someone is behaving like that then the people around them have a responsibility to challenge and confront them. That way, they get the message that their behaviour is unacceptable instead of it being a simple matter of them breaking a regulation and being mechanically removed from the ground. Barton Downs made the point earlier that the guy on his train thought it was acceptable to use racist language because John Terry was acquitted by the court. That's the problem with leaving these things to the 'powers that be' - some people think the problem is getting caught, not the behaviour or views themselves. There is an old saying “ it’s better to be an alive coward than a dead hero”. I think we would all like to think if we were in a situation where we could save someone’s life we would. How many times have we heard of a hero who has sprung into action and often with little regard of their own safety. But how foolish would it be to jump into deep water to save a drowning man if you can’t swim yourself? Very foolish indeed as the likelihood is that two people would end up drowning instead of one. In most actions we are about to take, we do need to try and do an instant risk assessment, failure to do so could have consequential effects. I know being only 5ft 4inches tall. Some 6ft pissed giant is not going to take any notice of what I may say and is more than likely just to thump me. It would hardly be a fair fight and I know who would end up the loser, ME. I know Lambie you do not always believe it when we say so many things in the old days were better than they are today, but some most certainly were. If the local brat pack were causing trouble outside your house, you went and told them you knew where they lived and if they did not pack it in, you would go and tell their mother and father. These days they will stick their fingers up to you and just tell you to F*** off. All you need to do next is keep an eye on your windows as there is a good chance a brick might be put through one of them. You knew if you did tell their mum and dad action would be taken and hard lessons would have been learned. It was called discipline but what ever happened to that and how did it get lost. In school you faced the cane if you were naughty, was that such a bad thing? No not in my book as there was a real price to pay if you were naughty, it was called pain, it hurt and you sure did not want it again. Job done then and lessons learned and you grew up knowing right from wrong. In my childhood days you have the local bobby walking around, if he caught you doing anything he gave you a clip around the ear. Was that so bad? These days kids know they can’t be touched and have no respect for the police, or anyone else it seems. Barton Downs is so right, some seem to think because its football, anything goes and nothing can be wrong, it’s no wonder so many decent people don’t want to go and watch football matches. They think all football fans are thugs, but as we know, most of us are also decent people and it’s only a few who end up tarring us all. You can politely ask someone to stop doing something that is causing offence, but if they are the type who would not listen to reason, or the sort that hits first and ask questions later, you would be wasting your time. So going to a steward is the best and only answer, at least you would be doing something rather than what most seem to do and that is nothing. I know from personal experience that things can be achieved by working with club stewards. We had our own little pack who sung the ref is a c*** every time he gave a decision they did not like. Was that acceptable to most of us. NO it bloody well was not and would I have got anywhere going and asking them to polity stop. NO I would not have. But words from the stewards got it all stopped in the end, for my trouble I did get a few thumps in the back while walking along the popside path at the end of the game. Fans pay good money to watch football, they should not have to put themselves in any danger by having to confront the sorts who think its ok to shout out racist remarks, let those who are paid to do it get on with it once it has been pointed out to them. On the J.Vine show only a few weeks ago there was a debate about how just one punch and kill. A drunken young man had gone into a late night take away and ordered cheese and chips. He then complained the cheese was not melted enough and the chef came out to talk with him. He hit the chef with one punch and knocked him out cold; the chef hit his head hard on the floor and died. That’s all it could take just one punch from someone who must be full of hatred anyway, do not take the risk fellow fans, but do not put up with it either. Try and tell a steward to get some action taken. That way you can get back to enjoying the match and go home afterwards to your wife, girlfriend, or boyfriend.
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Oct 1, 2012 20:55:29 GMT
I'm not getting into the Golden Age vs Reality debate Dave, it's been done to death. I may not have the insights of the Jeremy Vine show or live in the global crimespot that is Paignton, but I maintain that your perception of the present and the past is suspect.
I haven't advocated diving in at every occasion, and I've acknowledged there are occasions where the odds are such that intervention is difficult. I will say however that if I saw a fellow Torquay being assaulted after telling a racist cu*t to shut his mouth, I WOULD intervene physically.
|
|