|
Post by lambethgull on Sept 27, 2012 18:04:13 GMT
I'm just rather sorry that there are those in society who disregard the seriousness of racial abuse and see if as no more than a freedom of speech issue. Shame on them. Completely agree. But the boneheads who advance that argument have no sense of the concept of white privilege, let alone experience of being a racial minority. They're presumably the same folk who think racists and fascists should be invited onto TV programmes or allowed to march through other people's neighbourhoods with the express intention of intimidating people on the basis of their skin colour or ethnic origin.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Sept 28, 2012 18:15:24 GMT
No real surprise that the John Terry affair was one of the topics being debated on the J.Vine show today. I listened with great interest as two different arguments were put forward.
One person was saying that Anton Ferdinand had the choice in the beginning to let the FA deal with it, or take John Terry to a criminal court. We know what he choose to do and what the verdict was, not guilty. The same person talked about double jeopardy and also how the FA was like the pub landlord “it’s my pub and it’s my rules” He did go on to say that the FA should not be making the rules and then be the ones who make the judgments, he called for an independent body to do that.
What was surprising to learn was that in the last year over 5000 cases have come before the FA and out of all of those, only two were not found to be guilty. Seems a very good earner of the FA don’t you agree?
The man on the other side made it clear that the FA rules were no such words are allowed to be used on the pitch and based on that, John Terry can have no complaints as he did admit he said those words. But while the amount of the fine might seem a lot to us, to him due to the wages he earns, its no more than lose change.
Racism has to be fully stamped out of football and not just football; it needs to be stamped out everywhere full stop. There are many who think Terry should have had a much stiffer penalty than the FA gave him and it seems the leniency of the sentence has caused some black players to question whether the authorities are really tackling the issue.
This is from the BBC sport site
The "leniency" of John Terry's ban for racial abuse could cause black players to question whether authorities are really tackling the issue, says former Arsenal midfielder Paul Davis.
Davis said some black players were "disappointed" with Terry's four-match ban for abusing QPR's Anton Ferdinand.
He told BBC Sport: "I think the FA is starting to take things seriously. "But some black players feel perhaps the authorities are not taking [player abuse] as seriously as they should do."
Davis, 50, is a coach-educator for the Professional Footballers' Association as well as a spokesman for anti-racism initiative Kick it Out. As part of his PFA role he is trying to increase the number of black and ethnic minority coaches in England. And he says the Terry and Suarez cases have done "a lot of damage among players".
"I've spoken to a few black players who are understandably disappointed that the punishment has been very lenient when you compare it to a similar offence like Suarez's," So the question is was the FA to soft on John Terry and if you think it was, what should he have got?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2012 19:36:40 GMT
The same person talked about double jeopardy and also how the FA was like the pub landlord “it’s my pub and it’s my rules” He did go on to say that the FA should not be making the rules and then be the ones who make the judgments, he called for an independent body to do that. What a load of cobblers. We’re talking about a sport here. We’re not discussing a group of vigilantes who hold a kangaroo court and decide to tar and feather a gang of kids who have been unruly outside the local Spar. That’s certainly out of order. But a sport makes its own rules and sets its own punishments. I don’t actually see what is wrong with that in the main. A gardening society or a brownie pack would do exactly the same provided they were not infringing the law of the land. Who else would do it? The government funding it through the tax system? Prince Charles? Jamie Oliver? Mary Portas? Rumpole of the Bailey? Think locally, and that suggests the South Devon League or the Devon FA wouldn’t be able to make decisions about discipline. Right, chaps, find an independent panel of experts. In that case sign me up because I'm independent enough to ask for £500 a day plus my tea at Sainsbury’s Penn Inn once I’ve dispensed summary justice at Coach Road. That’s clearly a nonsense for everyday cases. But for something more serious? You know, listening to certain people, I do think too many of us have lost sight of football being just football as opposed to, say, international warfare. I’m listening to Radio Lancashire at the moment and I’ve heard a bloke talking about going to “hell and back” as a Blackburn supporter these last twelve months. What? What was surprising to learn was that in the last year over 5000 cases have come before the FA and out of all of those, only two were not found to be guilty. Seems a very good earner of the FA don’t you agree? That’s unbelievable. In fact I’m cautious about believing it all. So an online search. This comes from the Evening Standard: “Out of 473 cases heard by an FA independent commission in 2011, only two ended without punishment.”Now, two points about that. Firstly, 473 isn’t 5,000. But it’s still a lot. And 471 out of 473 is a somewhat sizeable proportion. Secondly, this report includes the words “independent commission” which are absent from a lot of similar reports. Those words are, of course, absolutely crucial. At this point it gets hazy. Contrary to what I’ve said above, here’s an example of a sport going outside the game to make judgements. You could, I suppose, applaud that. But it suggests a cut-off point somewhere in the equation. Mundane cases are heard within; for awkward ones bring in other people. But who chooses the experts and when to engage them? Well the FA, of course, and it’s said they only do this when they’ve a good chance of winning the case. And if the FA doesn’t, who does? How can you force the FA to refer certain cases outwards? I don’t know. It’s not simple, is it? Maybe an Independent Sports Adjudication Board funded - and supported - by the governing body of each sport and the lottery? Perhaps that's the answer although football would be more able to put in cash than table tennis or large-bore shooting. I also imagine a lot of the cases - especially the most high-profile - would be from football. But these debates can bring a smile to my face because I wouldn’t mind betting that at least half of the people who make these radio phone calls – the ones who yell “it’s an outrage. Something should be done about it!” – are exactly the ones who moan about government inference and useless pen-pushing bureaucrats sticking their noses into our business. So yes, folks, we’re talking state socialism as the solution. Quite possibly along the lines of the former East Germany. Let’s have a Stasi sports informer on every touchline noting which cases should involve the Internal Ministry of Sports Justice. It’s the only way.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Sept 28, 2012 20:36:29 GMT
yes it was 500 nick, I put an extra naught by mistake. The man who made the remarks against the FA was David Mellor. You can listen to it on the BBC Iplayer, its near the end of the show
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2012 20:39:22 GMT
Thanks for that, Dave.
If it's David Mellor it will be cobblers.
In my humble opinion naturally.
|
|
JamesB
TFF member
Posts: 1,526
|
Post by JamesB on Sept 28, 2012 20:39:56 GMT
David Mellor? As in THE David Mellor? As in the David Mellor who used to have sex with his mistress in a Chelsea shirt?
That man has no credibility before he even starts talking about such issues, let alone ones involving the team he supports
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Sept 29, 2012 12:59:13 GMT
Yeah, let's decide what we think after listening to some guy with a link to the FA and David Mellor have a conversation between the Beegees and Billy Joel.
|
|
|
Post by loyalgull on Sept 29, 2012 15:06:20 GMT
we have had a fantastic year of sport then theres football,plenty of overpaid over rated egos acting like kids,its pretty embarrasing,and its set to continue.Headed by an organisation who appear to smokescreen issues that need stamping on heavily.But whilst the mostly over paid prima donnas carry on acting like children theres no hope for football to clean its act up,a 280,000 plus fine fot Terry wont bother him one bit,until they all act like adults instead of do as they want in their own mind superstars nothing will change
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2012 16:24:03 GMT
I'm just rather sorry that there are those in society who disregard the seriousness of racial abuse and see if as no more than a freedom of speech issue. Shame on them. So true. The reason I wasn't around to see Barton after the match today was that I left early after an altercation with a racist in the home end. After the second incident I gave him a warning that if there were a third I would report him to a steward and get him thrown out. Can you guess what happened? My message to any fan in this situation is that I don't blame you if you decide, for the sake of a quiet life, to sit tight and say nothing, because, believe me, if you do decide to act then absolutely no-one is going to thank you for it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2012 17:06:19 GMT
Well done, Chris.
Same happened to me on the train between Newton Abbot and Torquay few months ago. In this instance it involved direct face-to-face abuse towards a couple of people from South Asia. Nobody chose to get involved other than myself and it was as if the whole incident simply wasn't happening.
An odd incident amongst our supporters today when a Torquay supporter wearing kilt and sporran blew a whistle late in the game. He was "outed" and, after considerable persuasion from some of our fans, was ejected by the stewards.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2012 19:44:52 GMT
Thanks Nick and well done to you too.
Interestingly what happened today was exactly the Terry incident in miniature. We were sat in front of a foul mouthed yob who was effing and blinding throughout the game (just like Terry) but who developed his abuse from useless effer to useless black effer when he chose Tendayi Darikwa as his target. The first time I thought I might have misheard (I was after all going deaf by this time) so I let it go, but when he did it again that was when I gave him a warning. "Effing report me to t'stewards then, you effer" was his response, so I effing did just that.
The upshot of all this was that, after he had also landed me a non-painful and frankly pretty pathetic punch to the back of the head, he was ejected from the ground.
The most painful thing about all this, though, is not so much encountering one stupid racist. As Nick discovered on the train, it is the utter lack of support from everyone nearby which hurts most. Not a single other spectator accepted that the use of an insult with reference to colour was offensive. It was as if the Suarez, Hylton and Terry cases had never been reported at all.
After a non-racist but similarly unpleasant altercation at Hillsborough last season I decided not to watch Chesterfield play away any more on the grounds that I have better things to do on a Saturday afternoon than to spend it among hooligans. I haven't really enjoyed watching football ever since, apart from when my Torquay friends made me feel welcome at the Argyle match. After today I don't think I shall be visiting the Spireites' home ground either. The racists, yobs, gobshites and cowards have won. It's their ground now; I have had enough.
Oh, and with respect to the title of this thread: Yes, the FA was right to charge John Terry. It's just a shame they didn't hand him a much longer suspension.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2012 20:27:43 GMT
The most painful thing about all this, though, is not so much encountering one stupid racist. As Nick discovered on the train, it is the utter lack of support from everyone nearby which hurts most. Not a single other spectator accepted that the use of an insult with reference to colour was offensive. It was as if the Suarez, Hylton and Terry cases had never been reported at all. I'll admit to playing a percentage game on the train by believing that, even if people wouldn't back me up at the verbal stage, they would do so if it became physical. Maybe that was a false premise on my behalf but, foolhardily or not, I took the strategy of attempting to belittle the bloke. He ended up telling me that his granddad had died on the Normandy beaches in 1942 to stop this country being "over run" by black people. As you can imagine I disputed the historical accuracy of that particular claim. As an aside, the incident took place the day after John Terry was cleared in the courts. And - would you believe? - he used words identical to those used by Terry. Perhaps, if he was capable of misunderstanding the whole point of World War Two, he was of the opinion that Terry being cleared made such behaviour both legal and socially acceptable. The difference between what happened to each of us is that I was aware that I'd probably never see the bloke again. He was both pissed and absolutely lost (I'm sure he went on to Paignton when he should have got off at Torre or Torquay). You, unfortunately, don't have that luxury and - sadly - some fans don't like people who "shop one of their own". That sort of unquestioning clannishness isn't one of football's most endearing characteristics in my opinion. Which makes for an interesting contrast to the episode of the man with the kilt, sporran and Acme Thunderer.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Sept 30, 2012 8:00:41 GMT
Yeah, let's decide what we think after listening to some guy with a link to the FA and David Mellor have a conversation between the Beegees and Billy Joel. I certainly have not decided anything after listening to some guy with a link to the FA and David Mellor have a conversation between the Bee gees and Billy Joe as you put it Lambie. I listen to the J.Vine show everyday week day as I just like listening to debate and the view points others may hold. For me taking the time to listen to the view points of others, allows me to consider my own views and question them if need be. As it happens I found myself disagreeing with much of what David Mellor was saying and would add that in my opinion, Terry should have been found guilty in court and the FA should have thrown the book at him much harder. We know it has been said that The "leniency" of John Terry's ban for racial abuse could cause black players to question whether authorities are really tackling the issue. It could also be the case after hearing what happened to wildebeeste yesterday, that some in this country now feel as Terry got away with it in court; it’s alright for them to carry on as before. I think it would be foolish for anyone to think this country is not full of many people who are guilty of racial hatred, all that is happened in my opinion is that because its been made to seem totally unacceptable which it is, it has gone more underground but not gone away If anything what I read and indeed some of the things others have said to me, it might be the case things are getting worse and one day we could see real trouble in this country. I live in a mainly white area, but have heard people here say such disgraceful things such as “ they are slowing moving in here” I know what they mean and do challenge anyone who I hear saying that, but what surprises me is these people who say such things, are the last ones I would expect to be racist. Maybe its all down to the PC factor, you take gay people for example, we now live in a world where you are expected to not have any views against them, my own views by the way are each to their own and while I may not understand it, its not for me to judge them or look at them in anyway other than I would someone who was straight. But those who are homophobic, their views have not changed and all that happens these days is they are careful who they talk to about their feelings, once again an example of nothing really changing, but more going underground. That for me is not something that’s good, its far better knowing who holds any views as then you can know where any dangers really are. I’m not religious in anyway, but if there is a god then we are all gods’ children no matter what colour or race we are, we should only ever judge anyone by who they really are as a person and nothing else and we most certainly should never abuse them in anyway. Racial abuse is a CRIME and the message needs to be given out loud and clear in this country of ours, do it and you will pay a very high price. Fining someone what is just over a week’s wages is not good enough and I would have banned him for life from the game.
|
|
|
Post by Budleigh on Sept 30, 2012 10:53:01 GMT
So does having sex with your mistress whilst she wears a football shirt mean a loss of credibility? Oh dear, in that case...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2012 11:11:37 GMT
There's probably a number of similarities between Budleigh and David Mellor anyway.......
|
|