chelstongull
TFF member
Posts: 6,759
Favourite Player: Jason Fowler
|
Post by chelstongull on Feb 8, 2010 9:57:16 GMT
Just the sort of chance that Sills would have buried, surely no-one can deny that. Sills might not have been blessed with pace but he sure made up for it in other areas, and some of his qualities are now sorely missed - his outstanding ability in the air in both boxes, his role as a targetman, his experience. Dave 'He tells it like it is' Thomas alluded to that on Saturday. I think the world and his dog would agree bar one......
|
|
|
Post by crispygull on Feb 8, 2010 12:20:10 GMT
Some good points raised about Sillsy.
One of the things that always impressed me about Sillsy was the number of headers he won defending our own box at corners and free kicks.
Scott Rendell had being doing quite well filling in for him in that role .. until he got injured. I do wonder whether the two late goals we conceded against Bradford and the one against Hereford might not have been cleared first time rather than the opposition pick up the knock downs to score, if Sillsy had been around to win the "first ball".
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Feb 8, 2010 13:46:06 GMT
Some good points raised about Sillsy. One of the things that always impressed me about Sillsy was the number of headers he won defending our own box at corners and free kicks. Scott Rendell had being doing quite well filling in for him in that role .. until he got injured. I do wonder whether the two late goals we conceded against Bradford and the one against Hereford might not have been cleared first time rather than the opposition pick up the knock downs to score, if Sillsy had been around to win the "first ball". That and the fact the ball was not sticking up front quite as it should have when closing down a game for victory. (Paul Buckle's concern at the time, I believe) Left too early.
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Feb 8, 2010 14:43:01 GMT
Just the sort of chance that Sills would have buried, surely no-one can deny that. Sills might not have been blessed with pace............................... .......................and that lack of pace means he might well not have even made it to get on the end of that ball. He knows that, the manager knows that; how come EVERY fan doesn't recognise it? Come on, the lack of pace of Todd, Greavsie, Sills and Nicho were there for all to see and it is no coincidence that they are the ones who departed or are about to. Just as different races need different horses, so do football competitions.
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Feb 8, 2010 14:51:01 GMT
Just the sort of chance that Sills would have buried, surely no-one can deny that. Sills might not have been blessed with pace............................... .......................and that lack of pace means he might well not have even made it to get on the end of that ball. He knows that, the manager knows that; how come EVERY fan doesn't recognise it? Come on, the lack of pace of Todd, Greavsie, Sills and Nicho were there for all to see and it is no coincidence that they are the ones who departed or are about to. Just as different races need different horses, so do football competitions. I have no problem with the sale. If Barnes had come in at the same time of departure, I would be content. As a sub to assist closing out the game/as an extra defender against set pieces/as someone who might nod a goal, certain qualities have been missed out of our list of options in the last 5 or 6 fixtures. I trust Barnes will assist in that role.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Feb 8, 2010 16:35:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by atheringtongull on Feb 8, 2010 19:26:20 GMT
Once again I'm a bit late adding my comments about the game. I've read most of the earlier posts and generally agree with most, except not many actually criticise the manager. When the team was announced I and my companions just looked at each other in total disbelief.
As already stated the only players to come out of this with any credit were the 3 defenders (not Cox) and Zebroski. Why was this?
Cox shows some talent but is too inexperienced and was given a torrid time throughout the game. He was responsible for needlessly giving away the corner which led to their goal by taking a fly-hack at the ball and slicing his kick so that the ball went backwards. Just think we tried to sign him permanently.
Thomsom looked totally out of place in the centre and didn't seem to know what his role was. He certainly seems to be easily put off his game when things aren't going right.
Carayol made one or two good runs down to the bye line, but got surrounded by defenders and not much came of them. O'Kane seemed to have trouble staying on his feet on what was a pudding pitch in front of the away supporters. Even if either of them had put in good crosses, most of the time there was no-one in the box to receive them.
Thompson gave his usual inept performance. In spite of all the praise he gets for his performances away from home he certainly didn't give one on Saturday. To make a tackle like that in the first minute was madness.
Poke once again showed his reluctance to come off his line to gather crosses. No matter that he helped us get promotion with his excellent performances previously, he does seem to have lost his confidence of late, and time to give Bevan another crack at it.
At least Buckle realised his error and brought Benyon on for the second half. With Mansell for Thompson making a big difference in midfield. Stevens was also brought on, but until he came over to the left side I didn't realise he was playing.
There is no doubt in my mind that Buckle makes too many curious selection decisions. Zebs and Benyon have done quite well as a forward pairing of late, and in spite of what Merse thinks about Benyon, in the last few games he has shown quite an improvement. So why change it? Carayol hasn't had a game for months, so why start him? Thomson is not a central player, so why play him there? Cox has only played for a few minutes as a substitute, so why start with him?
Enough has already been said about the officials! Respect? What a laugh!
BSP here we come.
|
|
chelstongull
TFF member
Posts: 6,759
Favourite Player: Jason Fowler
|
Post by chelstongull on Feb 8, 2010 19:40:57 GMT
Just seen the goal on Spotlight - seemed a soft one to give away.
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Feb 8, 2010 20:19:06 GMT
.........................in spite of what Merse thinks about Benyon, in the last few games he has shown quite an improvement. So why change it? I would suggest that the manager "changed it" because of Benyon's repeated struggle to get on the same wavelength as the other players, dreadfully lightweight attempts at ball retention * and pretty poor striking rate. His rate of effort and intention cannot be faulted, he is just not good enough and THAT is why we are seeking a replacement. Historically, Edgar Street has been a strength sapping pitch with a very poor surface making first touch vital, control of the ball difficult and putting in ninety minutes of graft a very demanding exercise. I heard negative comments about the pitch once again on Saturday, and wouldn't envy any lightweight character (Benyon/Thomson) their task from first whistle to last ~ another reason after the best part of a week on the road for the manager to stand Benyon down and use him from the bench. You often have to look beyond the actual ninety minutes of the game you are focussing on to find the reason behind decisions that baffle you. *For good examples of using one's body and body position to hold opponents off look at the three pictures on this thread from the Hereford game and the one of the Hereford player holding off Zebs is a particularly good example of use of arm, leg and upper body to retain possession. It is these aspects of his game Benyon needs to work on in my opinion!
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Feb 8, 2010 23:02:36 GMT
I've read most of the earlier posts and generally agree with most, except not many actually criticise the manager. When the team was announced I and my companions just looked at each other in total disbelief. It's these sorts of comments in these sorts of posts that I just don't understand. Why anyone this sure of his own opinions is reduced to posting on a supporter's message board instead of earning a decent crust in football management utterly defeats me. From my vantage point as an interested specatator, I am happy to give my opinion on performances. I am happy to give an account of how I saw a game pan out. But without seeing the daily performance and fitness levels of players, the way players are doing in training, reports on the opposition, it is quite frankly beyond my area of competence to start holding forth on the manager's strategies and selections. So are we sitting on an untapped resource of managerial talent? Or are we reduced to reading the ignorant wafflings of an army of irritating knowitalls?
|
|
|
Post by kingpin on Feb 9, 2010 1:30:51 GMT
i no il get shot down for saying this but i think we do miss sillsy and nico,everybody says that there to slow and buckle has bought pace in which is good but in all honestly the majority of the points we have gained were with nico and sillsy,i agree smith is a class act at goin forward but when he was at left bk he always got caught out of place and if no one believes that just have a look at the goals we have conceeded since he arrived and alot have come from his man/side.we had gone 9 games unbeaten when nico was dropped so why not persist while things were goin well.it hurts me to say it but i agree with the people that say the current squad has too little experience and we could be in trouble.what happened to the never give up attitude of the last 2 seasons.we used to fight to the last minute but now it just looks like the players give up.i am now ready for my verbal abuse of everyone.ha ha :-D
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Feb 9, 2010 3:52:45 GMT
But without seeing the daily performance and fitness levels of players, the way players are doing in training, reports on the opposition, it is quite frankly beyond my area of competence to start holding forth on the manager's strategies and selections. So are we sitting on an untapped resource of managerial talent? Or are we reduced to reading the ignorant wafflings of an army of irritating knowitalls? The irritating knowitalls who I reckon genuinely believe that managing a professional football club consists of nothing more than putting some attention to it on a Friday night and selecting a "team". I'm surprised they don't believe the manager gives preference to those who own a car, have their own yellow socks or are tall enough to help put the nets up....................and heaven help us if Elliott's dad owned the firm that sponsored the shirts!
|
|
|
Post by phipsy on Feb 9, 2010 10:10:20 GMT
totally agree kingpin regarding nico. the proof is in the pudding, we have not won a game since he was dropped. not to take anything from adam smith who is a very promising player. but and a big but there is no substitute for experience. lets take nico, who admittedly was skinned by a couple of fast wingers earlier in the season. that was put right when wayne carlisle was playing in front of him and things settled down and we were playing the best football for a couple of months thats been on view at plainmoor for a long time. just remember nico was the main source of our attacks for over two years with his immaculate distribution, free kicks, corners and not least his throw inns. where was plan "b" when he was left out. this obsession with pace is overrated, positional play is just as important.
finally who would a number of fans vote for as one of the finest defenders of all time ? well bobby moore would top a lot of lists and what pace did he have. not much more than nico in my opinion but more than made up for it with a fantastic reading of the game.
|
|
|
Post by aussie on Feb 9, 2010 10:16:55 GMT
Did Bobby Moore play wing back?
|
|
|
Post by phipsy on Feb 9, 2010 15:28:36 GMT
you know darn well that bobby moore didn/t play wing back!
just as vulnerable in the centre of defence , but reading of the game and positional play made him the arguably best defender in the world,despite lack of pace.
young fast defenders who have pace but no experience is not the answer and never will be.
|
|