Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2019 20:31:38 GMT
Comrade Felix Comrade Felix is exactly right on this point. And I’m sure it is a source of great pride to all Brexiteers that they are the ones associated with a genuine belief in democracy and above all the implementation of the result of such votes. Comrade Felix is fully justified in his assertion, as if he has been keeping an eye on the various TUFC Forums over recent years, he’ll be well aware that it has only been Brexiteers who have spoken up in support of the people of Catalonia when they faced violent repression from the brutal Spanish authorities, without a word of condemnation from the EU as the police batons smashed heads of Catalonians making the case for independence and pointing to the result of their Referendum. It won’t have gone unnoticed by Comrade Felix that it was the Remainers who stayed deathly silent and uttered not a word of support for the brave Catalan people. Comrade Felix will have further noted the similarity with it only being Brexiteers who had welcomed the self determination of the Crimean people by way of Referendum, whereas the Remainiac view across the Forums has tended to parrot the Western Imperialist language of ‘annexed’ by Russia...yes they’re only too happy to stand shoulder to shoulder with the Daily Mail when it suits them. You could throw in the weekly demonstrations in all weathers by the French working class, again violently opposed by Macron’s thugs in uniform, and at the cost of lost life, limbs and eyesight in many cases. And all this brutality directed by a President who freely admits his people would also vote to leave the EU if he were to allow them a vote on the matter. In this case again, it is the Brexiteers who have a record of siding with the people, for democracy and self determination, and in opposition to those who tacitly or otherwise, back EU style authoritarian control by the Eurocrats. But while there’s a sense of pride in being picked out by Felix as being the group who value freedom and democracy, at the very time when it’s never been more clear in Britain who are those willing to trample over both these fine British traditions if it will better serve their foreign masters, I’m therefore sure Felix can appreciate the misgivings that Brexiteers will harbour, knowing that democracy is never safe in EU lovers hands. The concern regarding an independent Scotland is ‘what kind of democracy would they be allowed ?’Sturgeon, Salmond & Co were exclaiming that you needed to vote in favour of Independence as it’d be a further generation before another vote. But now, less than 5 years on, they’re claiming it’s time for a new vote. My concern is, should a new vote be held and Sturgeon & Co win, could they be trusted to uphold democracy in the same way, and allow two further Referendums within the next 5 or 10 years giving people the chance to scrap independence ? Would the necessary safeguards be in place so that, having finally got the result she wanted, Sturgeon couldn’t pull up the drawbridge and say no more Referendums….for a generation or two !! It’s surely not a concern without foundation. Sturgeon, as a supporter of the EU, knows it’s an organisation that favours the ‘keep voting till you get it right’ approach. With the result you wanted at long last secured, then the voting can stop. It was similar with the 2016 EU Referendum in the UK. Many had to wait until they were almost old enough to collect their pensions before their first chance of a ballot on the question of EU membership was available to them. But now we’re told that it’s already time for the next one, in fact the next one should come round at such break neck speed that there’s not even been time to implement the last one so we’ll have to scrap it and forget all about that result. And those same concerns apply, that I fear could be the case with Sturgeon. If Remain won a new Referendum now, they’d implement the result and say ‘that’s it, no more Referendums’. Is it not possible that Sturgeon and the Nationalists could do likewise once they’d got a result they wanted ? If the numerous opportunities are being provided so as to achieve one particular ‘self determined future’ then you need to be confident that those who profit from it will have an equally strong conviction in democracy, and that they will be forthcoming, once in power, in providing opportunities to ‘self determine’ to remove them from power and return it to Westminster ? I think it’s more likely that young Scots could go a whole lifetime without the Nationalists giving them a chance to democratically overturn independence.
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Aug 12, 2019 21:24:30 GMT
AJ’s Northern Ireland solution is obviously eagerly awaited by TFF now present day wishes of Scotland have been batted off. That none of his Project Bullshit bedfellows have come up with one for the EU27 to mull over suggests it may be a difficult task. But if anyone can...
Scotland was told a vote for independence might be that which caused them to lose membership of the EU before casting of votes against. Unsurprising a Leave Project Bullshit defender might fail to acknowledge that which Felix had already pointed out, though.
Democracy overturns democratic decisions. Good and bad ones. Parliamentary sovereignty - that which illegal Leave championed - should again prevail. If a snap election increased a Tory majority, I’d imagine even illegal Leave might regain their desire for parliamentary sovereignty that seems to have lessened since the plebiscite fraud.
You would hope Parliament votes to give us a Final Say after blocking the cliff edge crash out no bugger advocated in 2016 when illegal Leave told mugs we’d negotiate the easiest deal in history with us holding all the cards with the EU27. The turmoil that has ensued since the 2016 fraud renders a Final Say the most pragmatic of options. But you never know. For all The Clown’s bluster, he tends not to stick to his word. These are unusual times.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2019 8:17:07 GMT
I'm sticking out my neck to be shot down (eh?) here but AJ's assertion that Ms Sturgeon ever used the words "once in a generation" is one of those myths, like The Batsman's Holding the Bowler's Willey and Crisis, What Crisis? that never actually occurred. What is undoubtedly true, though, as Rob confirms, is that Scots were told they would lose EU membership if they were to vote for independence, and that consequently the only way to avoid being kicked out of the EU was to vote for the Union.
The Act of Union took place in 1707 & I'm sure AJ would agree that 300 years is far too long to wait for a second opinion to be sought. I take his point that referenda might well be repeated too often but in this case my point is that, with reference to the paragraph above, Brexit is the significant change of circumstances that would legitimate Nicola demanding another go even if she did say "once in a generation," which she didn't.
By the way, please discount the proposed Wings Over Scotland Party which would be better named Wind Over Somerset since its potential founder is an attention-seeking Anglophobic, homophobic windbag who resides in the attractive and very English city of Bath. Why his neighbours have nae drooned him in the River Avon by noo is a mystery tae me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2019 9:46:51 GMT
Comrade McGull makes such an persuasive case that I feel almost convinced of the justification for an independent Scotland. Although I was teetering on the edge already, having long advocated that Celtic nations, particularly the one west of the Tamar, should give serious consideration to freeing themselves from being shackled to the English.
Many Forum users will be well aware that Comrade McGull's views on any subject, be that football, the countryside around Sheffield, books, extreme political correctness, or the far off land of Scotland, are always interesting, informative and amusing. And I'm sure his thoughts on any or every subject are enjoyed and appreciated by all TFF readers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2019 12:52:43 GMT
I'm sticking out my neck to be shot down (eh?) here but AJ's assertion that Ms Sturgeon ever used the words "once in a generation" is one of those myths, like The Batsman's Holding the Bowler's Willey and Crisis, What Crisis? that never actually occurred. What is undoubtedly true, though, as Rob confirms, is that Scots were told they would lose EU membership if they were to vote for independence, and that consequently the only way to avoid being kicked out of the EU was to vote for the Union. The Act of Union took place in 1707 & I'm sure AJ would agree that 300 years is far too long to wait for a second opinion to be sought. I take his point that referenda might well be repeated too often but in this case my point is that, with reference to the paragraph above, Brexit is the significant change of circumstances that would legitimate Nicola demanding another go even if she did say "once in a generation," which she didn't. By the way, please discount the proposed Wings Over Scotland Party which would be better named Wind Over Somerset since its potential founder is an attention-seeking Anglophobic, homophobic windbag who resides in the attractive and very English city of Bath. Why his neighbours have nae drooned him in the River Avon by noo is a mystery tae me. There's your problem right there...Ms! What Sturgeon needs, is a sound Rodgering to blow the wax out of her ears so she can listen to what the Scottish people are saying...and they are saying: we don't want any more of your independence referendums, we don't want to be separated from England and we don't want to see your ' Slapped Arse ' face in Scotland anymore!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2019 15:52:37 GMT
Ha! Till a couple of weeks ago you might have had a valid point there, Reg. However, the Boris Boonce has pushed support for independence above 50% in Lord Ashcroft's latest poll, not counting dinnae-kens. You might have seen on the TV the warm welcome Nicola and the crowd outside Holyrood gave to the new PM when he called round last week. He left via the tradesmen's exit around the back in order to avoid suffering the kind of fate that befalls St Johnstone's defence every time they play against Celtic.
|
|
|
Post by plainmoorpete on Aug 17, 2019 14:20:33 GMT
Latest poll for the Independent shows only 34% of voters support BoJo crashing out with no deal, and 42% to 39% favour MPs having the final say on brexit outcome. Of course I expect Alpine Joe will be able to spin those figures to give an entirely different picture.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2019 8:39:09 GMT
Nigel Farage's only Brexit Party rally in Scotland, to be held at the Caird Hall in Dundee on 12 September, has been called off. Mr Farage says this is because of "time constraints" but there is a strong rumour doing the rounds in Dundee that mentions only 81 tickets having been sold. The cancellation is bad news, not just for the disappointed 81 but also for the city's McDonalds, who were hoping to sell an awful lot of milk shakes on the day.
In Moray, a man claiming to be the Brexit Party candidate was disowned after it emerged that, calling himself Moraymint, he had called on social media for all mosques in the UK to be bulldozed. The Party explained that he had been nominated by mistake and that another guy was the actual candidate. This came as news to the man himself who thought he had been selected as candidate for Gordon, a neighbouring constituency.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 18, 2019 19:29:20 GMT
plainmoorpete I’m not so sure about that, Pete. But what I can do is provide a much fuller picture, rather than an obscured view that ensures five sixths of the picture isn’t revealed. Pete’s carefully spun ‘only’ 34% neglects to inform us that it is by far and away the most favoured outcome. So what are Prime Minister Bojo’s possible courses of action and how should he proceed ? Should he take over from Tezza and try to ram her deal through at the 4th attempt ? Should he call a 2nd Referendum ? Should he ask the EU for a further Article 50 extension and try to negotiate a better deal for us than the one Tezza came up with ? Should he scrap Brexit entirely by revoking Article 50 ? Or should he pull us out of the EU on WTO terms, as no satisfactory deal has been able to be agreed in excess of 3 years of trying ? The 1515 respondents to the Independent poll answered as follows: 34% - Leave With No Deal 22% - Revoke Article 50 20% - Call 2nd Referendum 11% - Don't Know 7% - Extend Article 50 (for fresh negotiations) 6% - Try again to get Tezza's deal passed by Parliament. Now while Pete isn’t explicit as to what ‘picture’ he believes this paints, he will have been quick enough to realise that those wanting Tezza’s deal implemented want some form of Brexit, and that those preferring Bojo to keep negotiating for a better deal also want Brexit to go ahead. Pete’s calculator will have informed him that 34+7+6 = 47% Whereas 22+20 =42% Indicating that on the more substantive question as to whether the UK leaves the EU, whether by deal or no deal, those favouring ‘Leave’ are in the majority. And that’s on the assumption that every one of the 20% favouring a 2nd Referendum are Remainers; a conclusion that must surely be rather charitable to the Remain side. But if Britain decides to inform the EU that we are choosing to Leave on WTO terms, since no deal that is acceptable to Parliament has been achievable in over 3 years (or ‘Crashing Out’ as Pete spins it in classic emotive Remainiac hyperbole) let’s not forget on whose shoulders a substantial amount of the responsibility will lie. Parliament has slung out every deal put before it. And any chances of BoJo negotiating a better deal are currently being sabotaged by the Remainiac MPs. A point made clear by the Prime Minister this very weekend: “It is as plain as a pikestaff that Brussels – or the EU 27 – will simply not compromise as long as they believe there is the faintest possibility that Parliament can block Brexit on 31 October. It is therefore obvious that any such Parliamentary campaign, any tricks of procedure or alliance of factions designed to derail Brexit, gravely damages the chances of our securing a deal.”
“The so-called efforts to prevent No Deal are in fact making No Deal more likely.”I’ll finish by advising all who take an interest in the ‘Art of Spin’ to keep a close eye out for the August newsletter from ‘You Know Who’ Some may have noticed a request elsewhere for the unspun results of the recent meeting between TUFC and TUST to be revealed. Similar to expecting the result of a football match to become common knowledge ahead of having to wait for a full match report to be typed up ...that possibly ‘bigs up’ one side to the detriment of the other. The request was declined. With early indications suggesting the meeting was not all sweetness and light, it could well be that our favourite spinmeisters are having to burn the midnight oil, as they grapple with how best to present this one.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,218
|
Post by rjdgull on Aug 19, 2019 7:02:05 GMT
I’ll finish by advising all who take an interest in the ‘Art of Spin’ to keep a close eye out for the August newsletter from ‘You Know Who’ Some may have noticed a request elsewhere for the unspun results of the recent meeting between TUFC and TUST to be revealed. Similar to expecting the result of a football match to become common knowledge ahead of having to wait for a full match report to be typed up ...that possibly ‘bigs up’ one side to the detriment of the other. The request was declined. With early indications suggesting the meeting was not all sweetness and light, it could well be that our favourite spinmeisters are having to burn the midnight oil, as they grapple with how best to present this one. Yep, no one picks up on TUST communications and publicises them more than you with just a little spin if I may say so on your part. 😉 I think this is the first meeting they have had with the club since George Edwards was appointed so no doubt it will need to be discussed at a committee before being relayed to their members and anyone else with an interest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2019 8:20:55 GMT
Comrade Joe is having a laugh with us. If 34% of the public want a No Deal Brexit and 66% don't, then there is no mandate for a No Deal Brexit. If a snap referendum were to be held this afternoon on the single question Do You Want A No Deal Brexit? then the likelihood is that it would be overwhelmingly defeated, especially since yesterday's Sunday Times revealed that the Government's own plans anticipate serious shortages of food and medicine, snarl-ups at the border etc not to mention the crisis that would befall the Irish economy.
People will die.
What will the history books make of it all? We all know that Boris Johnson decided to be a Brexiteer after waiting to see which way David Cameron would jump. That's why he wrote essays both for and against Brexit and waited to see which one would give him the best chance of becoming PM. We also know that Jeremy Corbyn is a supporter of Brexit; if he were not he would have made his position clear from the start rather than prevaricating and avoiding the question as he has done since the early weeks of 2016. In summary, then, we have a PM who deep down doesn't support Brexit at all threatening all kinds of shenanigans to make sure it happens, and a Leader of the Opposition who does support Brexit trying to become head of the campaign to stop it.
|
|
|
Post by stefano on Aug 19, 2019 9:30:35 GMT
Comrade Joe is having a laugh with us. If 34% of the public want a No Deal Brexit and 66% don't, then there is no mandate for a No Deal Brexit. If a snap referendum were to be held this afternoon on the single question Do You Want A No Deal Brexit? then the likelihood is that it would be overwhelmingly defeated, especially since yesterday's Sunday Times revealed that the Government's own plans anticipate serious shortages of food and medicine, snarl-ups at the border etc not to mention the crisis that would befall the Irish economy. People will die. What will the history books make of it all? We all know that Boris Johnson decided to be a Brexiteer after waiting to see which way David Cameron would jump. That's why he wrote essays both for and against Brexit and waited to see which one would give him the best chance of becoming PM. We also know that Jeremy Corbyn is a supporter of Brexit; if he were not he would have made his position clear from the start rather than prevaricating and avoiding the question as he has done since the early weeks of 2016. In summary, then, we have a PM who deep down doesn't support Brexit at all threatening all kinds of shenanigans to make sure it happens, and a Leader of the Opposition who does support Brexit trying to become head of the campaign to stop it. That is the best summary of the mess we have made for ourselves that I have seen......
|
|
|
Post by register on Aug 19, 2019 9:52:23 GMT
Comrade Joe is having a laugh with us. If 34% of the public want a No Deal Brexit and 66% don't, then there is no mandate for a No Deal Brexit. If a snap referendum were to be held this afternoon on the single question Do You Want A No Deal Brexit? then the likelihood is that it would be overwhelmingly defeated, especially since yesterday's Sunday Times revealed that the Government's own plans anticipate serious shortages of food and medicine, snarl-ups at the border etc not to mention the crisis that would befall the Irish economy. People will die. What will the history books make of it all? We all know that Boris Johnson decided to be a Brexiteer after waiting to see which way David Cameron would jump. That's why he wrote essays both for and against Brexit and waited to see which one would give him the best chance of becoming PM. We also know that Jeremy Corbyn is a supporter of Brexit; if he were not he would have made his position clear from the start rather than prevaricating and avoiding the question as he has done since the early weeks of 2016. In summary, then, we have a PM who deep down doesn't support Brexit at all threatening all kinds of shenanigans to make sure it happens, and a Leader of the Opposition who does support Brexit trying to become head of the campaign to stop it. I was just about to post what I thought was the best scare mongering story out there: 'Oh woe is me, it will be chaos at the ports if there is a No Deal Brexit'...and what do they show, the chaos that has existed at ports since day one, and will continue with or without a No Deal Brexit! Then along comes Felix with 'People will die!' That is unbeatable scare mongering Felix, it will never be beaten, it's an awesome gem! Who was head of propaganda in the 1940s...Himmler, or the other fella without a testicle! Whichever one it was, they will be smiling down at you!
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,218
|
Post by rjdgull on Aug 19, 2019 11:46:13 GMT
Who was head of propaganda in the 1940s...Himmler, or the other fella without a testicle! Whichever one it was, they will be smiling down at you! Goebbals of course! Names really aren’t your strong point.. I’ve seen the “people will die” comment on Twitter elsewhere so it is doing the rounds and I think is directed at the alleged difficulties envisaged in importing medical supplies after a no deal brexit.
|
|
|
Post by register on Aug 19, 2019 12:37:11 GMT
Goebbals of course! Names really aren’t your strong point.. I’ve seen the “people will die” comment on Twitter elsewhere so it is doing the rounds and I think is directed at the alleged difficulties envisaged in importing medical supplies after a no deal brexit. Ah yes, Goebbals, according to the song he didn't even have one testicle! Names have never been my strong point, I can always remember faces though, even if I can't put a name to them!
|
|