Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2014 17:01:47 GMT
Final score this afternoon:
Torquay Athletic 7 Teignmouth 69
|
|
hector
TFF member
Posts: 1,311
|
Post by hector on Oct 18, 2014 19:28:51 GMT
WP Wilkinson ought to get ready to answer some more tough questions. That really is a shocking result. Tics are an embarrassment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2014 8:51:15 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gullone on Oct 19, 2014 10:01:11 GMT
Great pictures of the ground Barton Downs. I wonder just how far short of football league standard the Rec was in 1950 when Torquay United announced they would apply for the lease when the Tics lease ran out in 1952. I realise that the pitch has always suffered from major drainage problems and i wonder just what increase in attendances would have been envisaged to make the move worthwhile.
|
|
hector
TFF member
Posts: 1,311
|
Post by hector on Oct 19, 2014 10:15:59 GMT
I remember the uprights, that still stand in the last picture, used to support a green roof but otherwise is unchanged and the end behind the posts at the seafront end was essentially a car-park on match days. Not that I ever went but those ornate turnstiles feature in childhood memories for some reason - possibly to watch something like 'It's a Knockout' there or something similar. Of Chris Roberts hairbrained schemes, TUFC at the Rec, could have been quite exciting, right by the station and seafront, and a move to Plainmoor may have breathed a bit of life into the Tics.
There is no rugby culture in Torquay, although why it has been overtaken by much more junior clubs in Brixham, Newton Abbot, Teignmouth and even Kingsbridge in recent years, is a mystery. Perhaps the club's refusal to contemplate the professional era did for it. Perhaps a fairly disparate local populace compared to say the tighter communities of Brixham or Exmouth (where the town has two thriving rugby clubs), means there is no support for, or interest, in rugby. You imagine in say, Brixham, most youngsters, at some point, come across the rugby club and the same would probably be true in Exmouth. In Torquay, it was probably only the grammar school that took rugby seriously and many of the ex-pupils from there would have moved away. Torquay has four secondary schools - any focus on one particular sport can be diluted, whereas in Brixham and Exmouth, with just one school, kids probably have less chance of avoiding it, if rugby has a dominant theme, which in a fisherman's town, or a town also linked to fishing as well as the armed forces, the tougher sport of rugby may have more appeal. Wildly, sweeping in terms of generalisations but a possible theory.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2014 13:06:11 GMT
That's a fascinating excerpt posted by Gullone. Not only does the Ladmore Plan sound intriguing in itself, but it's revealing the way Torquay United is portrayed as a "threat". Specific to this episode or on a longer-term basis? A huge giant ready to gobble up the poor unsuspecting Tics?
It would be interesting to learn of the relations between the two clubs over the years. Maybe, in the days of Narracott and Brockman, there was a friendly rivalry of almost equals. At other times there may have been hostility or distant cordiality. Now it's hard to imagine that Athletic and United need to have anything much to do with each other. I suspect that Herald Express picture of Chris Roberts and a group of TARFC officials represented a rare "official" meeting between the two clubs. Any other contact is probably less formal and a result of an overlap of personal and business interests between respective officials and directors. There may have been more of that in recent years than during the times of Mike Bateson.
The relative strength - and degree of influence - of the two clubs over time is another discussion point. One I'm sure we've touched on before. My understanding would be that professionalism made Torquay United the bigger entity from the 1920s onwards, even though the Tics continued to flourish. Gullone's article suggests that Torquay Athletic were frequently the best team in Devon before WW2. Then, it points to 1948/49 as the final flicker of greatness with excellent performances against Exeter, Plymouth, Aberavon, Swansea, Gloucester and Moseley. There was no such thing as league rugby in the 1940s but, let's be imaginative for a moment, and suggest that back then Torquay Athletic could have competed at what now equates to the Championship (ie the second tier).
One major difference between the two sports is that, compared to football, rugby union has far more of a "secret history" when it comes to results, players and information that compares the status and performances of clubs. It's easy for us to learn much about Torquay United's 1948/49 season; we'd probably have to approach the club direct - or to consult the Herald Express - to discover much about the Tics that season. What, for example, was the strength of the sides fielded by Swansea and Gloucester?
Another missing component is that of attendances. I'd love to know how many people watched or continue to watch Torquay Athletic. That would be a useful comparative tool when looking at the historical fortunes of the two clubs. But, whereas football kept such records from the Year Dot, rugby never did so (presumably because attendances and revenue where more fitting to a "commercial" sport rather than an amateur one). It's a complete and utter shot-in-the-dark but I'm imagining crowds of 4-5,000 for big games at The Rec in the 1940s; 2-3,000 in the 1960s. Not that we may ever know for sure.
As to the relative status and influence of the two clubs, I suspect another gap opened post-1950 as Athletic dropped a notch and United became an established Football League club. This gap has never narrowed and must have appeared a chasm when Torquay United were doing so well in the 1960s. And, indeed, it's enormous now. Not necessarily because of any great strength at Plainmoor; more a case of considerable decline at The Rec.
Hector has interestingly developed some of the earlier remarks about rugby union's relative strength in the South West set alongside other regions. It's not an exact point - because, in many towns, there are several football clubs and only one rugby club - but there are plenty of examples in Cornwall, Devon and Somerset where the rugby club is the largest single sporting institution in the town. Hector names a few of these places; there are dozens more. This will also be true of Gloucestershire but less so once you get into Dorset and Wiltshire. In the "rugby club" towns rugby, I assume, is relatively classless with more of a crossover in interest between the two codes. And, to illustrate this point, I encountered an East Devon rugby club on the train home from Dartford in August. They'd been to the Rugby League Challenge Cup final at Wembley and virtually needed to be poured off the train at Honiton in liquid form. I'd contend that, in socio-economic terms, they may not have been too different to most of the crowd at Wembley that day.
Yet Hector makes the point that Torquay has no rugby culture. I suspect it does but that it's comparatively diminished for a Westcountry town. There may be an interest in the Six Nations and the Chiefs but not necessarily in Torquay Athletic. Again, plenty of junior players but not so many seniors. And, imagining the Tics' perspective, I sense a delicious irony. It's possible Torquay Athletic bemoan their lot because "Torquay is a soccer town". Who'd have ever thought it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2014 13:33:18 GMT
In Torquay, it was probably only the grammar school that took rugby seriously and many of the ex-pupils from there would have moved away. Torquay has four secondary schools - any focus on one particular sport can be diluted, whereas in Brixham and Exmouth, with just one school, kids probably have less chance of avoiding it. Certainly food for thought there. The single-school nature of many small - and several quite sizeable - Westcountry towns may unify potential rugby players. That may be one of the many benefits of comprehensive school education for you. Torquay is, of course, quite different. I can't give an up-to-date view but, when I was young, the privately-educated kids were packed off in the direction of Exeter, Tiverton, Wellington or Taunton once they finished prep school. There wasn't a private school of any magnitude in the area. This, in theory, left Torquay BGS as the "flag bearer" for rugby union in the town. Certainly from my time there - which started not long after England's 1966 World Cup win and with Frank O'Farrell still at the helm at Plainmoor - we never took up the gauntlet on that one. It's easy to be simplistic; Westlands, Audley Park (and its successors) and Cuthbert Mayne may well have produced many good rugby players over the years (wasn't Lee Mears, Bath and England, a former Paignton CS student?). But maybe, just maybe, the battle for rugby union in Torquay was lost on the playing fields of Shiphay Manor. Perhaps we were the Heroes of the Revolution after all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2014 14:38:14 GMT
whereas in Brixham and Exmouth, with just one school, kids probably have less chance of avoiding it, if rugby has a dominant theme, which in a fisherman's town, or a town also linked to fishing as well as the armed forces, the tougher sport of rugby may have more appeal. Wildly, sweeping in terms of generalisations but a possible theory. That's a good point. In our hurriedness to label rugby union as a "posh" or "middle class" sport we often ignore the evidence in front of us. It's a tough sport that appeals because of its toughness. It's a funny one. Yesterday, after nipping in to The Rec, I had a cuppa at Beacon Quay. I immediately earwigged a conversation (as is my wont) about rugby union between two members of the sailing fraternity. One had been a member of a championship-winning university team whilst a medical student; the other was a keen follower of the game. The "player" mentioned several of his contemporaries - several significant names from the 1970s amongst them - and, to my mind, it was so rugby union of a particular era. It confirmed my prejudices of forty years ago; a narrowly class-based game played by the elite and those set to be our masters. Oh deary me. Those old prejudices come back and haunt and embarrass us from time-to-time. The dashing doctor - and his chums - was definitely an element of rugby union in the 1970s. But it never told the whole story then; far less so now. The sport appeals to doctors, accountants, teachers and surveyors. It also appeals to builders, farmers and fishermen. And people who wear uniforms at work. All sorts really. Rugby players are the same people who play football. It's the proportions that are different. That's the oddity. In Devon I often think the typical rugby player is a builder. When I go around the SW Peninsula League, I conclude that the typical football club sponsor is a builder. It's small world. If I was honest I'd say I prefer rugby league. There are certain well-rehearsed arguments which promote the league game as solidly working-class and proudly northern. This invites the need for a bogey man; enter rugby union as the polar opposite. Lots of truth in this, of course. Rugby union's former attitude to rugby league was appalling; its snobbery - in the highest places - quite distasteful. There is a socio-economic distinction. I tend to like rugby league because it's more akin to lower division and non-league football. I happen to think it's a shame - rather than a badge of honour - that it's largely confined to the M62 corridor. But the two games are bedfellows. If there was no rugby league, some of its followers and players would be football people; others would opt for rugby union. And, in your travels, you meet some curious people. I know a bloke from East Hull. He's a teacher, typical of many who work in the state sector. He's a Hull City season ticket holder. He used to play rugby union; he loathes rugby league. What can you make of that?
|
|
hector
TFF member
Posts: 1,311
|
Post by hector on Oct 19, 2014 19:24:06 GMT
A few years ago, I would always claim to prefer Rugby League to Union and that was mainly because of my left-wing leaning. At uni, I didn't have a great deal of time for the rugby union types who frequented the Union bar and I openly enjoyed it when England were humiliated by the Australians or All Blacks in the World Cup, as I hated all of that 'Swing Low, Sweet Chariot' bollocks. I disliked the way that Union didn't have much of a club scene and it was all about the 5 nations as it was then, and of course the 'amatuer' culture that pervaded the game. Rugby League was far more raw, and like football and I thought it a shame that history meant geographically, League was deprived to southerners unless you lived in London. Rugby League seemed to have a much more genuine club scene and in the mid-90s when Wigan and Bath played that challenge pair of games, I desperately wanted Wigan to put Bath in their place - which they more than did in the Rugby League fixture (played at Maine Road). I was optimistic that Wigan could win the Union game - I even placed a bet that they would, but alas they lost - although not as heavily as Bath did.
At the time there was even talk of the too codes joining together to form a sort new hybrid sport and I really hoped they would. Rugby League has suffered due to the professionalism of Rugby Union. It seems gimmicky, and tacky in comparison to the slick brand the Aviva Premiership has become and almost irrelevant. Certainly, the Rugby League World Cup, is a bit farcical - so a hybrid sport, with the likes of Wigan and St Helens playing Gloucester and Leicester but Union doesn't need League now. Even the club scene in Union has come on leaps and bounds and is getting better and bigger than ever.
I think you are right about the hardmen choosing rugby. When a friend and I used to follow Rugby League quite closely and their version of non-league clubs entered the Challenge Cup, we always used to comment about that difficult away draw to Hull Dockers - you can just imagine the brute strength and the knuckle sandwich you were likely to cuff.
And I prefer Union now - over the last 15 years or so, that has developed - and I will attend Chiefs games as often as I can now, which I have done so, since before they got promoted to the top division - it was just always a really good day out. Last weekend, with nearly 9,000 at Sandy Park, I looked around and thought, that with so many there, who just a few years ago, would not have been there, that rugby cannot be the sport of choice for all of them. It must be the 2nd sport for many like me, although at times, I enjoy watching rugby more now. For many, it has to be the feeling of being part of something really quite special, which there is no denying, Exeter Chiefs are. It is an amazing set up.
Yet, as we see, 60 odd years ago, Torquay Athletic did the double over Exeter and could a bit of vision and bravery have propelled Tics up the leagues instead? Obviously they needed money, but more geographically remote clubs like Redruth, Launceston and Penzance and have been long-established further up the leagues. With the same backing, could Tics be in the Premiership, had Tony Rowe decided to back Torquay instead of Exeter?
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Oct 19, 2014 21:08:22 GMT
With the same backing, could Tics be in the Premiership, had Tony Rowe decided to back Torquay instead of Exeter? A genuine question - has Rowe or anybody else actually given much financial backing to Exeter RFC? I know that £11.4m fell in to their lap when they sold the County Ground at the peak of the property boom. The sale was dependent upon two highly controversial planning decisions - to allow housing at St Thomas and the new ground at Sandy Park. I am pretty sure it was suggested at the time that the rugby contingent had the right kind of friends in the right kind of places to get these through and that a similar plan based on soccer rather than rugby would never have been approved.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2014 21:10:40 GMT
I certainly feel rugby league has come off second-best since professionalism was (officially) allowed in rugby union. And, in retrospect, it was probably always evident that such a "well-connected" sport as union could tap into all sorts of finance. If you're going to do it; do it well. It's almost like they invented a new sport. It's fashionable to blame Sky for many of league's ills. I just think the game has struggled to compete with union. It was pretty stark from the off; overnight players were switching from league to union for wodges of cash. The old idea of "going north" for filthy lucre instantly went up in smoke. And what do we see now? A player switching from Australian rugby league to join Bath. That's one route north, I guess. League has been innovative but, as Hector intimates, there's a thin line between innovation and gimmickry. The game is wonderfully evangelical - it's loved by all involved with it (the rugby league shelves in Waterstone's in Leeds are indicated "The Greatest Game") - and there's always this desire to expand the boundaries. But you wonder if it's not now the time to concentrate upon the heartlands. Here's the championship table from 1964/65 which was about the time when I first became aware of rugby league. It strikes me the game isn't half as important as it once was in a good half of these places: A top-sixteen play-off competition then followed with Halifax being declared champions Source: News of the World Football Annual 1965/66
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Oct 19, 2014 21:16:41 GMT
The feeling that Torquay United should have the Rec was far from a new idea. Of course TUFC rented the Rec from 1900 to 1904. There was a huge debate in the council before the decision was taken in the summer of 1903 that Tics could move in a year later. The questioning of TARFC's right to the ground has re-occurred regularly ever since. Here is a cutting from the WMN 06/12/22
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2014 21:48:28 GMT
A genuine question - has Rowe or anybody else actually given much financial backing to Exeter RFC? I know that £11.4m fell in to their lap when they sold the County Ground at the peak of the property boom. The sale was dependent upon two highly controversial planning decisions - to allow housing at St Thomas and the new ground at Sandy Park. I am pretty sure it was suggested at the time that the rugby contingent had the right kind of friends in the right kind of places to get these through and that a similar plan based on soccer rather than rugby would never have been approved. I wouldn't know. And it's not something that Tony Rowe was asked, or volunteered, in the recent interviews carried by a couple of local papers. The key figures mentioned in the interview: - Sandy Park initially cost £15 million; a further £10 million is being invested to "increase the size of conference and banqueting facilities". - Rowe's businesses have a turnover of £25 million. I assume this refers to SW Telecoms without reference to the Chiefs. - Chiefs have a £10 million turnover (x4 Torquay United?). Anticipated to be £11.5 million this season. - Rowe took over the club in 1998 when it had a turnover of £200,000 (a fraction of Torquay United's under Mike Bateson?). - Turnover was £1 million when the club left the County Ground; £3 million after a year at Sandy Park. This would have been when they surpassed Torquay United. This last point is ambiguous because the interview reads as if Exeter Chiefs moved to Sandy Park in 2008. It was actually 2006 and Rowe goes on to speak of spending £25 million at Sandy Park in "the past eight years". Rowe's involvement, of course, predates the move to Sandy Park by a good eight years. The controversy about building houses at St Thomas was prior to me moving to Exeter. He admits in the interview that his strategy with the rugby was to win influence within business circles. Possibly this helped with the move. He may also have been able to show the rugby club was in safe hands compared to some of the chancers associated with the football club over the years. When I walk over to St Thomas now the new houses seem in an obvious place in that they are surrounded by older dwellings. Sandy Park itself is between a dual carriageway and the motorway in an area that's steadily filling up with new houses. I don't know the history but, maybe, development was "fair game" at Sandy Park because it was within the motorway (which now seems to be Exeter's boundary as opposed to the one-time by-pass). That is with the exception of Cranbrook, the airport and the science park. The opposite side of the M5 between Sowton and Topsham would have been quite another matter.
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Oct 19, 2014 21:51:06 GMT
It is funny really that we are sort of coming to the conclusion that Torquay has been slow to adapt to the brave new world of professional and semi-professional rugby union. Going back in history, Torquay was very keen to embrace professionalism in rugby - long before it was legal to do so. Here is a letter written from Torquay to the editor of The Times in September 1897. Quite a compelling case for paying players on compassionate and egalitarian grounds - allowing those working class Torquinians to play without their poor wives and children starving as a result. You might question such purity in TARFC's willingness to pay players though as it extended to clandestine meetings with Welsh stars offering cash to play for Torquay - which led to TARFC being banned by the RFU in 1899. They were banned again for professionalism in 1912. Back in 1894, Athletic's big rivals Torquay Town committed an extraordinary act of self-destruction. It is alleged that Athletic tapped up Town's star player Bond in an attempt to get him to transfer his affections from The Rec to Plainmoor. Town admitted that they paid Bond and said that Athletic had offered him more. Athletic denied it and got off. Town were suspended and as result collapsed half way through the 1894/95 - their results having to be expunged from the league table.
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Oct 19, 2014 22:03:06 GMT
He may also have been able to show the rugby club was in safe hands compared to some of the chancers associated with the football club over the years. That's a good point. Whatever the whys and wherefores of the planning applications, it does seem that the huge windfall arising from them has actually been used for the benefit of the rugby football club and not "creamed off". That certainly has not always been the case with soccer clubs. Neither Torquay United nor Torquay Athletic has ever owned the freehold on their grounds - ruling out such a huge windfall. Exeter City of course did own the freehold on St James Park (not the real one) - paying for it with the transfer fee they received for Dick Pym. They frittered that away by spending beyond their means in the late 80s / early 90s - forcing them to sell SJP to Beazer Homes in order to survive. It was only the action of the council in denying planning permission and buying back the ground form Beazer Homes that saved City from being made homeless. A lot of soccer ground sales have come in similar circumstances - with the proceeds spent / wasted before the sale rather than invested after the sale.
|
|