hector
TFF member
Posts: 1,311
|
Post by hector on Sept 30, 2014 21:47:18 GMT
Why are they so poor? They seem to be worse every season.
Clubs from smaller towns like Exmouth, Brixham & Newton Abbot have all come from lower leagues and now exist two divisions ahead of the floundering Tics who are now worse than Kingsbridge and Teignmouth.
What happened?
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Oct 1, 2014 21:07:08 GMT
Why are they so poor? They seem to be worse every season. Clubs from smaller towns like Exmouth, Brixham & Newton Abbot have all come from lower leagues and now exist two divisions ahead of the floundering Tics who are now worse than Kingsbridge and Teignmouth. What happened? I blame Bill Phillips and Simon Baker, but I'm not going to tell you why.
|
|
hector
TFF member
Posts: 1,311
|
Post by hector on Oct 1, 2014 21:16:40 GMT
Why are they so poor? They seem to be worse every season. Clubs from smaller towns like Exmouth, Brixham & Newton Abbot have all come from lower leagues and now exist two divisions ahead of the floundering Tics who are now worse than Kingsbridge and Teignmouth. What happened? I blame Bill Phillips and Simon Baker, but I'm not going to tell you why. Yes, and I expect Thea has a hand it somehow as well!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 11:24:00 GMT
I’m sure we’ve previously discussed that there was a time when Torquay Athletic enjoyed a far higher profile than they do now. As Hector suggests they’ve slipped downwards since the introduction of, firstly, leagues and - secondly - the changing of the rules enabling players to be (officially) paid. I recently picked up a cheap copy of the Sunday Chronicle Football Annual 1955/56 which, although mainly a soccer publication, also covered both rugby codes. For rugby union it has a fixture list compiled from the games to be played by the following clubs: That certainly affords a degree of importance to Torquay Atheltic. My assumption is this isn’t a list unique to this particular annual (which was the forerunner of the News of the World Football Annual). My hunch is this was the action of the Press Association or a similar organisation. If so this may account for why the Tics’ results were often included in the national press and read out on the national BBC. The successor Empire News and Sunday Chronicle Football Annual went as far as including Torquay’s fixtures in its 1958/59 edition: Back when I was first of an age to notice, several national papers would publish the playing records of dozens of rugby clubs on a regular basis. I’m sure this included the Daily Express which my father read. This information was regionalised and it was something of a Monday ritual for me to spend thirty seconds or so checking the Tics’ tally. The complete records for 1963/64 are to be found in the Playfair Rugby Football Annual 1964/65. Remember this is in the absence of any form of league competition. The information is impossible to analyse without knowing the strength of the fixture list of each club. From the below you’d conclude that North Petherton were the strongest club in the region. Yet I’m sure that wasn’t the case. And here is the fixture list for the first Saturday of October 1964 as contained in that season’s Playfair. That’s fifty years ago this week. I reckon this pretty much constituted the list of results that were to be read out on Grandstand and Sports Report:
|
|
|
Post by gullone on Oct 2, 2014 15:48:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gullone on Oct 2, 2014 15:50:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gullone on Oct 2, 2014 15:52:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gullone on Oct 2, 2014 15:58:19 GMT
Dont worry i wont bore you all to death with a procession of old Tics programmes. Just my oldest for anyone remotely interested.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 16:45:39 GMT
On the contrary, Gullone, I'm sure a few of us world be interested in old Tics' programmes on an occasional basis.
Scribbler talks about a recent game against St Mary's. I take this to mean a team from St Mary's Hospital, one of the London teaching hospitals (now part of Imperial College). The London medical schools (Guy's, Thomas's, Bart's and their modern incarnations) compete for the Hospitals Cup which is just about the oldest rugby competition in the world. It was also the only club competition (outside of sevens) mentioned by those old yearbooks. There may have been one or two county cups but they were few and far between.
And, with Torquay Athletic's opposition on this particular occasion being Devonport Services, there's mention of inter-services rugby with the army, navy and air force battling it out at Twickenham. Not forgetting the universities - well Oxford and Cambridge - and you've soon got a fair idea of what once constituted the upper echelons of the sport. I found a copy of the Daily Worker Football Annual 1949/50. I was surprised it also covered rugby. Rugby League. No mention of the union variant.
Back to 1938 and Exeter will be the next "guests" at The Rec. Torquay playing Exeter at rugby union these days is totally unthinkable. It would probably be banned on grounds of health and safety. I'm trying to think of a football equivalent. Buckland Athletic facing Everton, maybe? Good grief, if Torquay were even to play a team called St Mary's now they'd most likely be from the Isles of Scilly. Or even St Marychurch.
Club president: W S Brockman. Does this mean that, of the two benefactors behind local cricket competitions, one was a ruggger man and the other a soccer man?
I'd not realised that Cobley's was a fish and chip empire with shops in other towns as well as Belgrave Road, Torquay. Nor that it was possible for one man - Harold Bowden - to simultaneously operate as a hairdresser, chiropodist and tobacconist. You wonder what other services he may have provided on the side.
I don't think the Meadfoot Inn is so much of a rugby pub these days.
|
|
hector
TFF member
Posts: 1,311
|
Post by hector on Oct 11, 2014 7:22:56 GMT
Interesting that the last scanned in page has the records of the Chiefs and Harlequins. The nickname 'Chiefs' was often used to describe the first-team, and only recently, Tony Rowe wrote how the appendage 'Chiefs' in the modern era, for Exeter, was actually simply a continuation of what the first team had always been known as and that it was supporters who added the Tomohawk chant and other paraphernalia.
The reserves of teams are often still called Quins these days with Tics, in the older days, being fairly unusual, among rugby clubs, in having an additional name 'Athletic', in the way football sides did.
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Oct 15, 2014 22:32:42 GMT
I wasn't going to turn this one into another tragical history tour, but seeing as Barty has taken us back to the 1950s and gullone to the 1930s.... I'll go back to some interesting correspondence in the Torquay Times in early 1880 - actually referring to the Torquay and South Devon club rather than Torquay Athletic. Someone had written in saying it was a disgrace that Torquay could not beat a club from a small town like Teignmouth. Yes, people loudly proclaiming their shame at the performance of Torquay's football club was not something that started with internet forums or 606. The reply from the club captain was that there just weren't enough posh boys in Torquay to put together a decent rugby team. This was not at the time a "soccer v rugby" thing. In the 1870s, only posh people played any football - the workers were too busy working. In the 80s, football exploded as a participation and spectator sport. Soccer was the working man's game in most of the country but Devon was like South Wales and the strip of Lancashire / Yorkshire that is now Rugby League territory in that rugby was very much the working man's game. During the 20th century - and a huge kick was given when TARFC left working class Plaimnoor for the Rec - Torquay settled more into the soccer/rugby class divide common in many other places. I suspect that Torquay Athletic now trains up hundreds of young players who leave to go to University and never come back - or at least not until their playing days are over. We have talked before about how the socio-economic decline of Torquay has negatively impacted Torquay United through emigration of a huge chunk of the fan base. I suspect it has hit Torquay Athletic harder as it is the playing base that has emigrated. Just like in 1880, there just aren't enough posh boys in Torquay to put together a decent rugby team. Plus ça change.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2014 0:49:25 GMT
1880 was the year my late maternal grandfather was born. Without doubt neither he nor WP Wilkinson could have ever imagined that a letter to a newspaper that year would be available to read 134 years later to anyone in the world with an internet connection. Technology is just awesome.
Great thread, by the way, Jon, Barty, and gullone. Love how you all dug this old stuff out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2014 10:55:33 GMT
Someone had written in saying it was a disgrace that Torquay could not beat a club from a small town like Teignmouth. I have in front of me the Sunday Independent dated October 12 2014. There is a rugby report headlined "Sprangle gets hat-trick as Tiverton see off Torquay". Under that lies the bleak detail: Tiverton 41 Torquay Athletic 6.Disgraceful, Sir. I remain your humble servant. B.A.R.Downs Esq, Lummaton House, Torquay, Devon Soccer was the working man's game in most of the country but Devon was like South Wales and the strip of Lancashire / Yorkshire that is now Rugby League territory in that rugby was very much the working man's game. I hope Felix doesn't mind being paraphrased from what he recently said elsewhere on the web (BTPIR, I think, as part of an interesting discussion about Wasps moving to Coventry). His basic point was that rugby union is both Oxbridge-dominated and London-orientated. I wouldn't go that far myself; certainly not in the era of professional rugby. But the game tends to be "posher" (to pick up on Jon's terminology) than football. Rather than "Oxbridge" I'd now veer towards "corporate"; rather than outright London dominance (there is a skew in that direction of course), I'd suggest enclaves in the more affluent parts of most parts of the country - from which clubs such as Sale, Newcastle and Leeds grew. Sheffield is a good example at a lower level; two clubs both located in the leafy suburbs on the main roads to the Peak District. But we know about Leicester and Northampton; Bath and Gloucester. Places where rugby union has wider appeal than elsewhere - isn't Lee Mansell a big Gloucester RFC supporter? And that wider (as opposed to mass) appeal is a factor to be considered throughout the south west. Travelling around the region, rugby sometimes strikes me as a "posh" activity; other times anything but. If, say, across much of England rugby union is a 10% minority sport compared to football; it's 25% through nearly all of the south west from Land's End to Tewkesbury (I make these figures up, based on little evidence, solely to illustrate a point). I suspect that Torquay Athletic now trains up hundreds of young players who leave to go to University and never come back - or at least not until their playing days are over. Yes, you're right. With all sorts of mini-rugby and age group teams, there must be hundreds of young people playing rugby union in South Devon. A fair chunk will move away; others will play the game to a certain age only. I wonder whether, more generally, there are concerns about the tail off in participation in adulthood? There appear to be as many rugby clubs around as ever; but are there as many 2nd, 3rd and 4th XVs as there once were? Would this, in turn, affect the playing prospects or motivations of South Devonians moving to another area? A further hunch is that many clubs, which were once "social", are now "competitive" in a way that is increasingly similar to football. This means that, if you want to continue your rugby, you're best taking it seriously rather than purely as a Saturday night piss-up. I sense that, for many, playing rugby may be an essentially childhood activity prior to taking up five-a-side football as a twenty-something with the lads from the office or practice. The university business is intriguing. It must now affect football far more than it once did. How many of those well-scrubbed kids doing their Sunday-morning Soccer School progress to higher education? Loads I suspect. And you can see it in the SDL and Peninsula match reports: so-and-so has "returned to university"; the normal goalkeeper was "unavailable due to university commitments". Gosh, once-upon-a-time that would have earned an individual the name of "The Prof". Now it's nearly half the team. We have talked before about how the socio-economic decline of Torquay has negatively impacted Torquay United through emigration of a huge chunk of the fan base. I suspect it has hit Torquay Athletic harder as it is the playing base that has emigrated. Just like in 1880, there just aren't enough posh boys in Torquay to put together a decent rugby team. People leave South Devon; others move there. Torquay Athletic, you imagine, "imported" rugby players over the years. What about all those Welsh teachers who stayed in Devon after training at St Luke's College? That's a supply line which has dried up; there must be others which have also declined. Or are Torquay Athletic simply not adept at playing the game of semi-professional rugby? Or even, for that matter, not particularly willing to embrace the process of a game which must now resemble particular aspects of non-league football? To this effect I'm assuming that in rugby you have a "mixed economy" of contracted players (full- and part-time), players who are paid by-the-game and those who are strictly amateur. Where do local clubs fit into this arrangement when it comes to 1st XV players? Look at the league tables and you'd assume Barnstaple, Brixham, Exmouth and Newton Abbot are the "payers" in Devon rugby below the level of Exeter and Plymouth. Maybe there are smaller amounts of cash at a lower level too with Teignmouth having slightly more than Torquay Athletic? Possibly TARFC are simply skint; resolutely amateur by tradition; or unashamedly too posh to trouble themselves with such grubby matters. I really don't know; it would be interesting to learn more. I'm sure we'd welcome thoughts from anybody associated with the Tics both with respect to contemporary as well as historical matters. Mind you, there's also the possibility that the sea air down at The Rec makes one somnolent. As such a move there may not have done Torquay United any good at all. We may have ended up dozing in the sun watching home league defeats against Tiverton Town. Heaven forbid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2014 13:55:04 GMT
Great thread, by the way, Jon, Barty, and gullone. Love how you all dug this old stuff out. Thanks for that, Florida. It's good to know people appreciate this type of material. Indeed I'm reminded of a conversation I had with a friend recently which begun with her asking "why do you watch football?" I gave one of those answers where I tried to avoid saying "it's more than just a game" or that "it's not just about the game itself." It can be of course; nice and simple. Or you can venture towards topics associated with history, geography, politics, sociology, cultural studies, economics or whatever. This site reflects this as much as any. Some of us stick to the matter in hand: what's happening at the club this week; the last match; the next game. This, in turn, can focus on team matters - players, incidents, selections - or analyse the mechanics of the club. Others of us venture down all manner of pathways, not all of which are in the present. We veer too between territory where football is impassioned debate and where it is a more gentle pursuit. This thread is a case in point. Ostensibly it's about another sport altogether. But not exclusively because (for some of us) it's to do with our home town, its history and what people say and write about sport. It starts with Hector asking a pertinent question about Torquay Athletic being amongst the (supposed) small fry; it progresses to Jon finding pretty much the same being said in 1880. To which effect WP Wilkinson's letter is absolutely fascinating. And it's not just about the game per se which you may be excused for thinking it would have been one-hundred-and-thirty years ago. The first half of Wilkinson's letter tackles the context of mid-to-late Victorian Torquay; the second half addresses the Teignmouth game itself. We're told from the outset that "a large number of inhabitants do not necessarily ensure a good football club". That's true but it undoubtedly helps. Equally, it depends on who those people are. Wilkinson makes the point that, not only does Torquay lack a suitable range of occupations and industries, it also possesses more than its' fair share of sickly inhabitants. Even its scholars, bank clerks and law clerks "come here in the majority of cases because they are not strong". This speaks of a town in transition from health resort to holiday resort. You wonder how long this remained the case or, just as pertinently, was perceived to be true. You can almost imagine later letters to the press dismissing the chance of establishing professional football in Torquay because it was "a town full of weaklings". They wouldn't say that about us now, would they? But Wilkinson's view of the town reads as being skewed towards that of the middle-classes. Quietly, behind the veneer, another Torquay was developing. People were moving from the countryside to build houses, lay pipes and tramlines, deliver beer and coal, work in shops, administer care and work as servants and cooks. These people were to become the urban society that, if it did not initially organise association football in the town, played and watched the sport in increasing numbers. I suspect a notable chunk of Torquay United's present support may be their descendants. The second half of WP Wilkinson's letter is one more example of showing how little some things change. He picks up the earlier correspondent's complaint about "square men placed in round holes and visa versa". Give "A Lover of the Game" another week or two and he'll be bemoaning a lack of a Plan B and WP Wilkinson always picking his mates. There's also the club v county issue: the Torquay club has given up players for Devon; the rascals at Teignmouth haven't. An element too of Teignmouth being more "up for it". It's their cup final after all. It reads well; it's an intriguing document. Yet I've no doubt that Cap'n Wilko's finely-tuned correspondence is a both a perfectly-crafted mixture of reasoned explanation as well as a collection of downright excuses. You imagine that - when it came to football, rugby or whatever other sport - it was forever thus.
|
|
hector
TFF member
Posts: 1,311
|
Post by hector on Oct 16, 2014 22:05:00 GMT
It is has been quite interesting for me, when involved in Exeter Chiefs, Super Saturdays, a few times, to notice that the majority of boys participating in the training and lap of honour etc, are anything but posh. I think there may be a new generation coming through who are sporty boys, tempted by what is obviously the most glamorous sporting club in Devon, at the moment. More blokes, blokes running the youth teams that take part as well.
The rise of Chiefs is a phenomenal story. The walls of the corridors to the changing rooms from the pitch, are adorned with the yearly team photos going right back through history at the County Ground, which relatively speaking, wasn't that long ago. As we were there, last weekend, on a tour around the ground, it was amazing to see the utterly professional approach. In their gym, under the stand, with specialist equipment and coaches were their young Academy players - dressed in black vests, with Exeter Chiefs Academy printed upon them, each player doing a set of exercises under the watch of an individual coach, moving on and the next one coming along, all the data being entered into a laptop by the coach/physio. It felt more like the army but the attention to detail was incredible and these were just young players but when you consider the likes of Nowell, Slade, Cowan-Dickie, Hill, Ewers etc, all coming through their academy system, in football, there isn't really an equivalent at the top level.
It shows what a bit of vision, and of course some money can do, to turn a ramshackle outfit, that once upon a time, was a dwarf next to Torquay United, into a behemoth in comparison to the Gulls now. There was nearly 9,000 there but that now almost seems a smallish crowd for Chiefs.
|
|