Enzo
TFF member
Posts: 283
|
Post by Enzo on Aug 20, 2010 21:31:49 GMT
London has such excellent public transport (apart from the regular weekend dismantling of much of the Underground/Overground system for upgrades) that I do not miss being able to drive a car one bit. The only time I would miss using a car now is for out of town journies and in particular long distance ones. This life choice is not an option in many parts of the country however, and in the rural South West in particular. I can see no will nor clamour for a return to the days when, even in Devon; people could hop on a train to visit outlying areas and the bus network is run almost purely for profit and without recourse to the needs of those who rely on it. Witness the recent comments by the management of Stagecoach regards the clamour for a fully enshrined pedestrianisation of Fleet Street in Torquay which everyone knows is a fatality waiting to happen with the buses traversing the present "partly pedestrianised" area. All Stagecoach can see is an increase to their fuel bills and the necessity to re-align their network, and they will try to bully their will to ride roughshod over a sensible and socially responsible policy being instigated; mark my words. London has made driving for the private and leisure motorist both a chore and a very expensive option by policy, but at the same time has made it less of an endurance for the wealthy who can more easily afford congestion charging, PCN fines and parking charges than the working classes.................the wealthy don't use public transport ~ they use their own, or pay for private services such as that which I used to work in. Local authorities have latched onto the cash cow that is the punitive method of relieving motorists of their money to such an extent that they now cannot envisage life without this very considerable cash flow. It is not progress, it is not quality of life enhancement; it is bloody misery and it is (once again) another example of Jimmy Reid's Rat Race. We've had this debate before about London's over hyped public transport system. It's nowhere near excellent. Nowhere remotely near. My daily trip is a 10 minute walk to South Ealing, then it's 35-40 minutes with the Picadilly line. In between South Ealing and Acton Town there are 5 sets of signals (the train can stop at each one for a minute or so!) and Acton Town acts as a bottle neck as the other branch of the Picadilly line joins at Acton. My daily experience is that as long as you travel off peak (at 7am and go back at 4pm) the journey is fine and pretty comfortable. But if you leave it any later and it's a horrible experience. Throw in daily signalling issues and adverse weather (hot or cold, wet or windy) and believe me the journey is disgusting. I can think of only one decent interchange on the whole network between The tube and the Bus network and that's Hammersmith which is the only station on the whole network where some brains have been used. Plus there's the price you pay. I feel lucky with my 75% discount on the Oyster Card because I would have a heart attack paying full rates. You even pay more to experience the joy of being pressed up against tube door at peak times. From your previous posts, I know you have travelled extensively outside of the UK and I agree with you about the price of travel in London. That said, I'm slightly tired of people knocking the London underground system.......as I have been in the past about people knocking the BBC.. Your insight is obviously far greater than mine - However, very few rail systems around the world carry the number of people across as wider area as the London Underground and do it as consistently well as it does. I accept it is not perfect, but, in my opinion, having travelled and worked (including extensive use of the Eurostar) in Europe, Asia and South America the London transport system is something to be proud of. That said the weekend disruption is getting very annoying!
|
|
Enzo
TFF member
Posts: 283
|
Post by Enzo on Aug 20, 2010 21:45:30 GMT
Firstly, there is NEVER a valid excuse for cyclists jumping lights. You'll hear cyclists say after jumping a pedestrian crossing (us law-abiding cyclists pull them up for it as well believe it or not!) "But there was nobody waiting" - as if such a ridiculous argument could not be made by a motorist who did the same. Having said that, not all motorists realise how crucial it is for a cyclist to make his intentions clear at red lights and junctions, and that doing this effectively almost always involves getting away first. The risk to a cyclist failing to communicate his intention to go straight (as opposed to turning left) at a junction is massive compared to a motorist. This fear, for that is what it often is - particuarly in novice cyclists - goes some way to explaining some of the law-breaking from at lights. That said, i survive without jumping lights, so there's no reason why everyone else can't imo. Road markings have improved massively i recent years. But there remain some junctions that are impossible for cyclists. I have to take a different route home than i do when leaving South London for this reason, even though it means an extra 1.5 miles to my journey Drive through Kennington, Stockwell and Clapham betwen 5 and half 7 on a week night and you may well see that the number and behaviour of cyclists make it near impossible for car drivers to negotiate some junctions as well! I have never met a cyclist who does not critisise other cyclists.................and yet all of them are perfect road users themselves.
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Aug 21, 2010 0:23:53 GMT
Drive through Kennington, Stockwell and Clapham betwen 5 and half 7 on a week night and you may well see that the number and behaviour of cyclists make it near impossible for car drivers to negotiate some junctions as well! Having driven, motorcycled and cycled in London I think it is beyond dispute who is the most vulnerable at road junctions - badly behaved or not. If you've done all three and formed a different view, I'd be interested to hear it. That'll be a bit like all those motorists complaining about cyclists who have never speeded, adjusted their radio/satnav at the wheel, jumped a red light or crossing, used a bus lane or eaten whilst driving then
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Aug 21, 2010 0:32:47 GMT
From your previous posts, I know you have travelled extensively outside of the UK and I agree with you about the price of travel in London. That said, I'm slightly tired of people knocking the London underground system.......as I have been in the past about people knocking the BBC.. Your insight is obviously far greater than mine - However, very few rail systems around the world carry the number of people across as wider area as the London Underground and do it as consistently well as it does. I accept it is not perfect, but, in my opinion, having travelled and worked (including extensive use of the Eurostar) in Europe, Asia and South America the London transport system is something to be proud of. That said the weekend disruption is getting very annoying! I agree. The underground is far from perfect: it smells, it's often unbearably hot, it can be ludicrously over-crowded, and the cost of single trips borders on the extortionate. That said, it's a system that works reasonably well considering the volume of people that use and rely on it throughout the working week, and you only have to see the carnage that ensues when the system breaks down completely (which only happens very rarely). Buses can be equally uncomfortable, whether they are dangerously over-crowded during rush hour or disconcertingly uncrowded in the early hours. The sheer affordability, availability and coverage of buses however is really pretty damn good all things considered.
|
|
|
Post by chrish on Aug 21, 2010 6:54:24 GMT
I encountered a new one today. The latest craze seems to be to text from a mobile phone and ride your bike at the same time while moving all over the road. I harangued a stupid cow for doing just that the other week.................the kids and I had waited for the signal to use a Pelican Crossing and this daft bat came sailing through, straight towards us; so I stood still forcing her stop. She yelled at me for doing that and said I should have kept moving, I told her to feck off and get off her bloody phone and she told me she was using it as a SatNav! haha! A SatNav? That makes sense!
|
|
|
Post by chrish on Aug 21, 2010 8:25:48 GMT
We've had this debate before about London's over hyped public transport system. It's nowhere near excellent. Nowhere remotely near. My daily trip is a 10 minute walk to South Ealing, then it's 35-40 minutes with the Picadilly line. In between South Ealing and Acton Town there are 5 sets of signals (the train can stop at each one for a minute or so!) and Acton Town acts as a bottle neck as the other branch of the Picadilly line joins at Acton. My daily experience is that as long as you travel off peak (at 7am and go back at 4pm) the journey is fine and pretty comfortable. But if you leave it any later and it's a horrible experience. Throw in daily signalling issues and adverse weather (hot or cold, wet or windy) and believe me the journey is disgusting. I can think of only one decent interchange on the whole network between The tube and the Bus network and that's Hammersmith which is the only station on the whole network where some brains have been used. Plus there's the price you pay. I feel lucky with my 75% discount on the Oyster Card because I would have a heart attack paying full rates. You even pay more to experience the joy of being pressed up against tube door at peak times. From your previous posts, I know you have travelled extensively outside of the UK and I agree with you about the price of travel in London. That said, I'm slightly tired of people knocking the London underground system.......as I have been in the past about people knocking the BBC.. Your insight is obviously far greater than mine - However, very few rail systems around the world carry the number of people across as wider area as the London Underground and do it as consistently well as it does. I accept it is not perfect, but, in my opinion, having travelled and worked (including extensive use of the Eurostar) in Europe, Asia and South America the London transport system is something to be proud of. That said the weekend disruption is getting very annoying! You took the Eurostar eh? You're a brave soul. Wait until Deutsche Bahn take over! Ok, I'll slightly modify my view. I get annoyed when people describe London's transport system as excellent because it's not. The London Underground can do a decent job providing the signals aren't knackered, there's no rain getting to either the signals or the exposed wiring on underground lines that become overland routes. At Peak hours if a train doesn't come every 2 minutes the platforms become dangerously crowded and the whole service grinds to a halt as it takes much longer for people to get off the train and longer for people to get on again. As long as everything works London Underground can just about get away with it. Only just though. As for numbers. The only comparable Cities in Europe to the size of London are Paris and Moscow. London Underground carries between 3 and 3.5 milllion people per day. The Paris Metro system (including the 5 RER commuter routes which bring people in from the suburbs) actually carries 4.5 million people. Plus its a lot cheaper. Those RER lines are just amazing and help with congestion so much. I think CrossRail will help London Underground a little. Moscow's metro system carries 7 million a day, more than double London and Tokyo's carries 6.2 million. New York carries about 5 million a day and Seoul's subway carries 5.6 million . It's also worth noting that Madrid, Shanghai and Beijing's Metros have been expanding quite rapidly over the lat 20 years or so. Shanghai has ovetaken london as the longest system and Madrid has 24 more stations than London. The figures above don't take into account a great deal of people who live South of the River as London Underground only reaches a few parts. The commuter strain here is taken by overland train networks running into the likes of Waterloo, Victoria, Cannon Street and London Bridge. Credit where it's due. He might be a complete baffoon but Whiff Whaff Boris has done a good job getting the Oyster Card system into operation for overland services south of the river. There's been more reductions in ticket prices than increases. Our trouble is that we quite proudly have the oldest underground system in the world. But as ever being pioneers rarely helps things in the future. The problems we have are from the old infrastructure. The best parts of the network for me are the Jubilee extension with all the new stations. Unfortunately the tube tunnels are too small to run bigger trains, the signals are horriby inadequate to run frequent services at peak times and you always get delays when the lines branch out at both ends. I've been on quite a few different systems in the past (Paris, Amsterdam, Berlin, Munich, Dusseldorf, Helsinki, Valencia, Barcelona, Hamburg, Brussels, Lille, Zurich, Bern, Mannheim) and London Underground never ceases to disappoint. I do wish we would take a leaf out of Zurich's book and have trams instead of buses in central areas and then start the buses where the trams stop. There's just far too many buses (all driven by idiots) at the moment. At peak hours again it's not uncommon to see everyone trying to cram on one Bus before another arrives empty and usually leaves empty. But I have a personal fetish for trams though. As for the BBC. I think they've been spending TV licence money as badly as New Labour have spent our taxes. Do we really need another series of My Family? Or pay for John Barrowman's make up, frocks and teeth whitening? Or indeed for hiring the baying rentacrowd for last year's cringeworthy Question Time with the people versus Nick Griffin. That weasel Jack Straw got away with everything in that programme. I felt a bit sorry for Nick Griffin. He might be a racist idiot but no-one derserves facing a lynchmob live on a national and supposedly impartial bastion of Television. I was surprised that they didn't "stone" him to death with expensive Waitrose Valencian Oranges. But then again if I were in charge of spending the BBC's money daytime TV wouldn't exist, David Dickenson would be unemployed, Kate Silverton and Fiona Bruce would cook and clean for me in skimpy outfits, Frankie Boyle would read the news, Alan Partridge would do Match of the Day and I'd just have Sport, Top Gear, Hairy Bikers and Coast and other documentaries on 24/7. But I'd rid the BBC of Gary Lineker's smugness, those two gobby prats on Masterchef, that Scottish weasel and the bloke who always carries an umbrella around in a signature way from Coast. Just because London Underground and the BBC are national institutions it doesn't mean that they should be immune to criticism or immune to change. PS How's your mate Sven doing by the way? Still unemployed I take it?
|
|
|
Post by aussie on Aug 21, 2010 10:04:10 GMT
Firstly, there is NEVER a valid excuse for cyclists jumping lights. You'll hear cyclists say after jumping a pedestrian crossing (us law-abiding cyclists pull them up for it as well believe it or not!) "But there was nobody waiting" - as if such a ridiculous argument could not be made by a motorist who did the same. Having said that, not all motorists realise how crucial it is for a cyclist to make his intentions clear at red lights and junctions, and that doing this effectively almost always involves getting away first. The risk to a cyclist failing to communicate his intention to go straight (as opposed to turning left) at a junction is massive compared to a motorist. This fear, for that is what it often is - particuarly in novice cyclists - goes some way to explaining some of the law-breaking from at lights. That said, i survive without jumping lights, so there's no reason why everyone else can't imo. Road markings have improved massively i recent years. But there remain some junctions that are impossible for cyclists. I have to take a different route home than i do when leaving South London for this reason, even though it means an extra 1.5 miles to my journey Drive through Kennington, Stockwell and Clapham betwen 5 and half 7 on a week night and you may well see that the number and behaviour of cyclists make it near impossible for car drivers to negotiate some junctions as well! I have never met a cyclist who does not critisise other cyclists.................and yet all of them are perfect road users themselves. A bit like dog walkers then, they all swear that they pick up after their dogs yet theres millions of dog sculptures everywhere! Just thought I`d get my whinge in as this thread seems to have turned into `the moaning old gits thread!` ;D
|
|
Enzo
TFF member
Posts: 283
|
Post by Enzo on Aug 21, 2010 14:43:00 GMT
Wow....thats the longest thing I have ever read on Underground systems. You love your stats and certainly know your stuff - I am only going on my experience and in places other than London and Brussels (in europe) my experience is limited. I agree, institutions such as the LU and BBC should never be immune from critisism and should always seek progress. That critisism needs to be rational rather than a rant about what clothes employees are allowed to wear (for example). The vast majority of critisism is based on people's taste in listening and viewing - as you demonstrate. I imagine the stats back up the argument for a further series of My Family. The stats may not support the level of coverage given to clubs like Torquay United, but we do alright out of it - as do many, many other people who have interests outside of the mainstream. . You often state how irritating you find some of the critisisms that TUFC fans yell at Paul Buckle and the team. I find some lazy critisism of LU and BBC equally irrational although it does not affect me as much as TUFC fans get to you!. I have little knowledge of exactly what the BBC has been spending the licence fee on - I'm happy with the value for money I get for my 40p a day. I'd pay that just for the website. We grew up with the BBC our expectation of it increases by the year -Again, much of my opinion is based on my experience of television in other countries. Anyway, as s I originally said, the London transport system is not perfect, but it does not deserve some of the comments made about it. I agree - it is far from excellent. I take your points about Paris and Madrid, but in my experience (only of Paris) I have not been overly impressed. Again, personal experience over stats and it maybe more down to my own ignorance of the full transport network in Paris. Similarly, I have found the New York transport system dreadful on a couple of occasions. My main concern about our system is the cost of it - people arriving at Heathrow must be horrified. Now, with regard to my mate Sven.......... don't get me started!! I am sure he is doing fine living off one of his many pay offs! As I recall you got the stat book out for that one as well. In reality, under Sven we qualified with ease for all major tournaments and got to the quarter finals in three on the trot, going out twice on pens - Even with the so-called golden generation that is about par for the course for England. The major critisism of Sven was that he couldn't inspre the players to the next level - had he enjoyed the tournament luck that Bobby Robson did in Italy or Venables did in Euro 96 he would be remembered differently. In tournament terms, the English national side has been an embarrasment since he went. I imagine there will be some stats somewhere which suggest otherwise!
|
|
Rags
TFF member
Posts: 1,210
|
Post by Rags on Aug 22, 2010 8:42:32 GMT
Our trouble is that we quite proudly have the oldest underground system in the world. But as ever being pioneers rarely helps things in the future. The problems we have are from the old infrastructure. As for the BBC. I think they've been spending TV licence money as badly as New Labour have spent our taxes. ... But I'd rid the BBC of Gary Lineker's smugness, those two gobby prats on Masterchef, that Scottish weasel and the bloke who always carries an umbrella around in a signature way from Coast. Everyone has known for decades that the London Underground need a very high level of investement to overcome its problems, yet the problem of under-investment stlll exists. Doesn't Roman Abramovish fancy giving something back to his fans and slapping £10b into a tube overhaul? As for the BBC, as a Public Service Broadcaster it should ignore viewing figures and put on programmes that cater to the tastes of its viewers: that's its mandate. Personally I enjoy watching the gobby two on Masterchef and that Scottish weasel on Coast; and would accept GB's smugness if the opportunity cost was the removal to the Tower of London of Hansen, Lawrenson and Shearer. My mother always complains about the amount of repeats on the BBC and then demands they show old favourites like Dad's Army again. What she means is she only likes the programmes she likes and wants more of them instead of the programmes she doesn't like. That's the view of all of the population and is the one thing that the BBC has an issue dealing with: as a Public Service Broadcaster, how does it please all of the people all of the time?. It would help if Mark Thompson didn't insist on wasting money by moving production departments around the country at regular intervals but the real waste of money is BBC-i, the inaccurate BBC website. It's purpose is not covered by the television licence and is therefore sucking resources away from the screen onto something that is already being covered by other "suppliers".
|
|
|
Post by chrish on Aug 22, 2010 11:13:03 GMT
Our trouble is that we quite proudly have the oldest underground system in the world. But as ever being pioneers rarely helps things in the future. The problems we have are from the old infrastructure. As for the BBC. I think they've been spending TV licence money as badly as New Labour have spent our taxes. ... But I'd rid the BBC of Gary Lineker's smugness, those two gobby prats on Masterchef, that Scottish weasel and the bloke who always carries an umbrella around in a signature way from Coast. Everyone has known for decades that the London Underground need a very high level of investement to overcome its problems, yet the problem of under-investment stlll exists. Doesn't Roman Abramovish fancy giving something back to his fans and slapping £10b into a tube overhaul? As for the BBC, as a Public Service Broadcaster it should ignore viewing figures and put on programmes that cater to the tastes of its viewers: that's its mandate. Personally I enjoy watching the gobby two on Masterchef and that Scottish weasel on Coast; and would accept GB's smugness if the opportunity cost was the removal to the Tower of London of Hansen, Lawrenson and Shearer. My mother always complains about the amount of repeats on the BBC and then demands they show old favourites like Dad's Army again. What she means is she only likes the programmes she likes and wants more of them instead of the programmes she doesn't like. That's the view of all of the population and is the one thing that the BBC has an issue dealing with: as a Public Service Broadcaster, how does it please all of the people all of the time?. It would help if Mark Thompson didn't insist on wasting money by moving production departments around the country at regular intervals but the real waste of money is BBC-i, the inaccurate BBC website. It's purpose is not covered by the television licence and is therefore sucking resources away from the screen onto something that is already being covered by other "suppliers". I enjoy Masterchef as well and I scold my mother if she uses the term gravy when it should be "jus" or a "reduction"! The two gobby ones just annoy me by stringing out the last syllable in every final word of a sentence. Example? She makes little mistakes but she can really cooooooook! Maybe its just me though Yep, the under-investment still exists but in the meantime (nice beer by the way) poor sods get charged for a premium for an average (at best) service. I always miss the BBC when I'm abroad as if you get past all the awful new sitcoms, day time rubbish and the One Show then there is an awful amount of good comedy, although Mock the Week isn't what it was without Frankie Boyle and there's some truly excellent documentaries and fact based programmes. However Holby City and Casulty get series after the series commisioned when Alan Partridge couldn't get a second series is beyond my comprehension. I think that the i-player is excellent although again I'm not sure why I can watch iPlayer without a TV licence but I need one for the TV to watch the same thing.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Aug 22, 2010 13:25:39 GMT
Merse has touched on this thread about the Stagecoach bus operation here in Torbay and their intension to fight any plans to close Fleet Walk to all their buses. The plain facts of the matter are the mix of pedestrians and buses in what is meant to be more a pedestrian area is an accident waiting to happen and one day someone is going to be killed in Fleet Walk by a bus. There has been and will be more minor accidents with the buses, pedestrians’ and the buildings in Fleet Walk, anyway why call it Fleet Walk if those who do walk it have to dodge large double decker buses while walking it.
One big problem is there is a road right down the middle only wide enough for one bus and so passing places had to be built and it’s these passing places that are the most dangerous parts of Fleet Walk.
When I was young we had the good old Devon General who provided the whole area with a good reliable bus service, there were even such things as bus stations complete with toilets and a café. While the out of town routes to the out lying villages did not make hardly any profit if at all, they were subsidized by the very profitable number 12 bus services from Newton Abbot to Torbay and other profitable routes.
I do not know who ran the bus services after I left Newton Abbot and moved to Torquay, but I do know it was Bayline who ran the bus services back then and what a terrible rubbish service it was. Hundreds of small Ford Transit mini buses touring the streets with thick black diesel smoke pouring out of the back of them.
If you were hoping to get on one say at Castle Circus you were doing simply that LIVING IN HOPE, they were always full when they arrived and unless someone got of at Castle Circus, no one was getting on and it was a case of hoping once again the next one might not be full up. In the end I always ended up just deciding to walk home and it was going to be quicker in the end and far better then being cramped up in one of those silly little buses.
I may be wrong on this but was it not Stagecoach who sent buses down to the Bay and ran a free bus service just to get everyone using their buses? I know I remember well reading about a company doing just that in Torbay and who else could it have been?
What ever happened Stagecoach ended up running most of the bus services in the Bay and soon got rid of the routes that did not make the required profit level and as a result cut off communities to any sort of public transport and greatly increased fares on the routes they still wanted to run along the way.
Most here in the Bay who do live on a bus route only have the one choice and it’s a case of pay their prices or walk or get a taxi. I seldom use the bus service but Carol does a lot and we are a bit more lucky living here as the FIRST BUS SERVICE that runs from Plymouth to Torbay and might even go on to Exeter( not sure about that) runs close to our house. It’s much cheaper than Stagecoach and she can also catch the River Link bus that is part of the round robin trip run by the Paignton Steam Railway and that bus is even cheaper still.
The subject of closing Fleet Walk to buses has come up before and I wonder if the council has not pushed it forward fearing a long and expensive legal battle with Stagecoach. I’m not sure how it all works, maybe Merse will, but as taxi drivers have to be licensed by the local authority surely a private bus company must be as well?
If that is the case I can’t see how a private company would be able to dictate to the local authority what roads it can or can’t use, I would have thought when any licence to operate a bus service was granted the roads that could be used were specified and clauses inserted so changes could be made if required.
What is being said is there would be pick up and drop of points at each end of Fleet Walk for Stagecoach to use and even me with my very short legs and now bulging waistline can walk Fleet Walk in under three minutes so there is no great hardship anyone will suffer for not being dropped off in the middle of Fleet Walk.
The real problem is Stagecoach are always going to want to be able to drop off and pick up passengers around the harbour area and many of the buses that end up by the harbour be it ones coming from Paignton or say Babbacombe that currently go up Fleet Walk and up Abby Road and on to Castle Circus and then beyond and just how can the harbour be linked to Castle Circus using other roads.
Let’s take a look at the bus coming from Babbacombe to the harbour as an exsample, it will come down Torwood Street and then onto Cary Parade and I suppose it could then go along the seafront but would it be able to get around the very Sharpe bend and onto Shedden Hill? It’s the only way it could go if it also wants to pick up and drop off passengers at the top of Fleet walk. But then Abby Road would need to be closed to all cars and made into a two way bus road and the roundabout would have to be altered at the top of Fleet Walk so the buses could swing round and go back up Abby Road.
But then what of the cars that come down the first part of Union Street and then have to use Plimlico Lane that comes out onto the roundabout at the top of Fleet Walk and all the cars coming down Market Street that also have to use Plimlico Lane as well. I suppose the traffic system could be reversed in the part of Union Street from Castle Circus to Market Street so cars coming from Market Street would drive up to Castle Circus but then the two main car parks in the town centre would be cut off from all traffic coming from the Castle Circus direction.
I just think the above plans would just cause so many problems and so after leaving Cary Parade the only sensible route the Babbacome bus could take would be along the seafront, up Belgrave Road turning right into Lucius Street down Tor Hill Road to Castle Circus but then it would have not been able to pick up and drop off at the top of Fleet Walk. So if Stagecoach still wanted that to be a drop off and pick up place the bus would have to go around the town hall and back down Union Street and then Plimlico Lane to get to the top of Fleet Walk and then back up Abby Road to get back to Castle Circus.
This is going to mean that Stagecoach would indeed find their fuel bills rising and fairs would go up to maintain the profit levels they want and you can see they do have a reasonable argument about Fleet Walk being taken out of use for them and there simply are no easy answers as to what other roads the buses can use to serve all the points they need to.
At the end of the day while I support the banning of buses in Fleet Walk I just can’t see it ever happening, just like I can never see the Kingskersell bypass ever being built. I had high hopes work was going to start on the bypass next year, but due to the new government and all the cutbacks they do have to make; it looks now the bypass is going to be scrapped again. There has been recent talk of building the road and making it a toll road. Sorry but the Bay has been allowed to fall into a bad state of repair as money as been wasted on Byes pipedreams and not spend on the very basic things such as cleaning painting that would smarten up Torbay, so I can’t see people wanting to pay to enter Torbay and once they knew that had to would simply choose to go elsewhere.
If it ever became a toll road the rat runs around here would be jammed up solid, I sure would not be looking to add to my costs to get to work by paying to use a road to get there each day and so many here in Torbay have had to find work outside the Bay as there simply are no jobs other then in the holiday trade and even they are getting scarcer these days here.
Maybe the only answer is to bring back the tram system that once operated in Torbay, but I would have thought even that system had to go the long way around certain parts of the Bay due to the fact the Bay is built on seven hills. Yes those same seven hills I claimed Roberts once stood on to announce his arrival to Torbay.
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Aug 22, 2010 15:56:49 GMT
. I’m not sure how it all works, maybe Merse will, but as taxi drivers have to be licensed by the local authority surely a private bus company must be as well? If that is the case I can’t see how a private company would be able to dictate to the local authority what roads it can or can’t use, In Metropolitan areas, bus services are regulated and therefore routes or networks of routes can only be operated by the company granted an operating licence to do so by the relevant transport authorities (in London that's Transport for London) in other areas they are de-regulated which means that any company can apply to run a service having given 28 days notice to the relevant authority and only have to give 28 days notice to withdraw from doing so as well. They call it "Private Enterprise" and "Competition" in reality it's the public getting fobbed off with rubbish. So whilst major urban areas get a good network, professionally and socially responsibly run; areas like Torbay get a cheap and cheerful "you get what we provide or lump it" service from companies like Stagecoach......................it's the Tory philosophy dating back to the bad old days of Nicholas Ridley aided and abetted by Margaret Thatcher when companies like Stagecoach, under the Souter family; got their snouts in the trough of privatisation and your silly little Bayline buses were started by a guy called Harry Blundred who it is clear to see was all about making a fast buck, paying rock bottom wages and feck the public and the environment with their poison spewing little vans and treating human beings like parcels. The FACT is though that the local authority CAN dictate which roads allow buses and which don't , the problem YOU have in Torbay is they and the operator in your area are all rabid Tories and therefore diinterested in social responsibility and the environment. It's money before people again, it's knowing the cost of something and the value of nothing and it's corrupt ~ how do you change it? Change your political representatives!
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Aug 22, 2010 16:03:46 GMT
how do you change it? Change your political representatives! As you know merse its not that easy as you have found out in London, we went down the route of change and got fobbed of with a system where we no longer have a thing called democracy, just a dictatorship and while we can get the dictator out in nine months, we are stuck with the system for many more years to come.
|
|
Rags
TFF member
Posts: 1,210
|
Post by Rags on Aug 22, 2010 19:15:40 GMT
I enjoy Masterchef as well and I scold my mother if she uses the term gravy when it should be "jus" or a "reduction"! I love it, but it can get to pretentious b*ll*cks level sometimes: what exactly is an "emulsion" and how can "pigs head terrine" be anything other than the proverbial king's new clothes?! I presume you have your mum serve your chips stacked 2 by 2; I make mine serve my baked beans in a small, circular pillar. Which is why I don't get invited home very much these days...
|
|
keyberrygull
TFF member
Posts: 994
Favourite Player: Steve Cooper
|
Post by keyberrygull on Aug 22, 2010 20:06:00 GMT
. I’m not sure how it all works, maybe Merse will, but as taxi drivers have to be licensed by the local authority surely a private bus company must be as well? If that is the case I can’t see how a private company would be able to dictate to the local authority what roads it can or can’t use, In Metropolitan areas, bus services are regulated and therefore routes or networks of routes can only be operated by the company granted an operating licence to do so by the relevant transport authorities (in London that's Transport for London) in other areas they are de-regulated which means that any company can apply to run a service having given 28 days notice to the relevant authority and only have to give 28 days notice to withdraw from doing so as well. They call it "Private Enterprise" and "Competition" in reality it's the public getting fobbed off with rubbish. So whilst major urban areas get a good network, professionally and socially responsibly run; areas like Torbay get a cheap and cheerful "you get what we provide or lump it" service from companies like Stagecoach......................it's the Tory philosophy dating back to the bad old days of Nicholas Ridley aided and abetted by Margaret Thatcher when companies like Stagecoach, under the Souter family; got their snouts in the trough of privatisation and your silly little Bayline buses were started by a guy called Harry Blundred who it is clear to see was all about making a fast buck, paying rock bottom wages and feck the public and the environment with their poison spewing little vans and treating human beings like parcels. The FACT is though that the local authority CAN dictate which roads allow buses and which don't , the problem YOU have in Torbay is they and the operator in your area are all rabid Tories and therefore diinterested in social responsibility and the environment. It's money before people again, it's knowing the cost of something and the value of nothing and it's corrupt ~ how do you change it? Change your political representatives! I was totally unaware that they were poison spewing little vans I thought they were cute. ;D ;D ;D What company ran the ones that serviced the housing estates of Newton Abbot and kept at the racecourse overnight called? "Teign bus" dubbed "Teeny bus"
|
|