|
Post by longeatongull on Feb 13, 2010 14:49:46 GMT
Love the avatar Oz. Mate when you let chinese crackers off it's like the somme! Come 12 o'clock our time and 5 yours let's hope the only fireworks are here! Happy New Year DTG=====is this the new you? ---couple of lovely/friendly/pally almost fluffy posts today. Come on you Gulls---we need 3 points today.
|
|
|
Post by flats on Feb 13, 2010 14:52:37 GMT
Torquay 30 Poke 22 Smith 23 Charnock 34 Branston 37 Camara 07 Mansell 11 Wroe 32 O'Kane 33 Thomson 08 Barnes 29 Zebroski Substitutes 01 Bevan, 05 Robertson, 36 Rowe-Turner, 12 Thompson, 18 Carayol, 19 Stevens, 09 Benyon
|
|
|
Post by kingpin on Feb 13, 2010 14:53:32 GMT
hi,has anyone got the team line up and subs please
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Feb 13, 2010 14:59:08 GMT
Line up (4-4-2) : Poke Smith, Charnock, Branston, Camara O'Kane, Mansell, Wroe, Thomson Zebroski, Barnes Subs: Carayol, Rowe-Turner, Robertson, Benyon, Stevens, Thompson, Bevan
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Feb 13, 2010 14:59:20 GMT
Flats has. Ringing in the changes. I like the look of this side. Hope Manse can settle in well to what is a "new" position to him. I'm sure it's been tested a lot in training. Now for the Battle.
|
|
|
Post by petergodfrey on Feb 13, 2010 15:08:12 GMT
Hi davethegull ! How are you managing to listen online for free ?
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Feb 13, 2010 15:10:23 GMT
Pertinent point is that just TWO of this starting line up began at the first whistle against Chesterfield when we started the season........................ Mansell and Wroe
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Feb 13, 2010 16:06:21 GMT
Significent half time substitution: Bevan for Poke in goal
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Feb 13, 2010 16:20:43 GMT
Significent half time substitution: Bevan for Poke in goal Not as significant as Benyon for Thomson. 1-1. And sounds like a debatable penalty decision against our very own David Fairclough.
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Feb 13, 2010 16:28:04 GMT
Christ
|
|
Enzo
TFF member
Posts: 283
|
Post by Enzo on Feb 13, 2010 16:28:08 GMT
Pertinent point is that just TWO of this starting line up began at the first whistle against Chesterfield when we started the season........................ Mansell and Wroe And one of those players is playing in a completely different position. Do you think it is pertinent in a positive, negative or neutral way? I am all for moving the squad forward, but a rebuilding of this magnitude at this time, when we are in our position is foolish beyond belief, in my opinion. This kind of project is surely better undertaken when a club has already secured safety during the final few months of the season with half an eye on the following campaign. It would have been far better to make changes in a more piecemeal manner I worry that the most pertinent thing about this point is the similarity between this and the dreadful season we got relegated. I am thinking of our desparate way in which we are reliant on the loan system to the detriment of team coherance and morale. The danger is you end up with a team playing like strangers and when you go down the loan players clear off back to their home clubs. That was a master class of mismanagement and this is heading the same way. The team needed some additions to add speed and a different dimension - we are generally all agreed on this point. However, to ship out players before securing adequate replacements was suicidal. We are very lucky to be in such a weak league at the moment - Grimsby have not won in 20 games and are still only second bottom!
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Feb 13, 2010 17:26:22 GMT
Pertinent point is that just TWO of this starting line up began at the first whistle against Chesterfield when we started the season........................ Mansell and Wroe And one of those players is playing in a completely different position. Do you think it is pertinent in a positive, negative or neutral way? I am all for moving the squad forward, but a rebuilding of this magnitude at this time, when we are in our position is foolish beyond belief, in my opinion. This kind of project is surely better undertaken when a club has already secured safety during the final few months of the season with half an eye on the following campaign. It would have been far better to make changes in a more piecemeal manner The team needed some additions to add speed and a different dimension - we are generally all agreed on this point. However, to ship out players before securing adequate replacements was suicidal. Pertinent in that we are virtually starting again Enzo, and at this stage of the season (the last third) that is not a good thing given our league position; not an easy position to be in You say changes should have been made in a more piecemeal fashion, but given that the first home win came against a side obviously lacking pace and the first away defeat against a side embracing all the pace and aggression one could wish to see; it was obvious that certain players from the BSP would be running on former glories at this higher paced level and that in particular messrs Sills, Nicholson and Hargreaves had had their day in the sunshine. To criticise the club for shipping out before "shipping in" is understandable but probably missing the nuts and bolts of the situation in that those departures probably made up the higher paid of the squad and the very FACT of the imposition of the Transfer Window which all clubs have to work with and which inevitably leads to a greater reliance of the loan system than ever was the case for the smaller clubs. So to say that it should have been left until the club had acquired a safe position is to ignore the question whether or not that position could have been achieved without making the changes.......................not in my opinion from what I saw with my own eyes early on (four early games), but freely admitting that I then saw nothing with my own eyes until the recent game at Barnet. It's a matter of debate but not a matter with which to berate the club or this manager who's tenure will be surely be decided by the outcome of the policy. No need to go nuts tonight, both Grimsby and Darlington below us and Cheltenham above us have again failed to win. In my experience, and we have much (too much of this over the years) it is essential to maintain focus on the NEXT game and not the last. Stay well aware that a whole THIRD of the season lays before us and (again in my opinion) that is a good time left in which to settle THIS squad down as it stands at the moment.
|
|
petef
Match Room Manager
Posts: 4,626
|
Post by petef on Feb 13, 2010 18:07:56 GMT
Just back from the game and I'm afraid it just gets more and more depressing with very little of a positive nature to report. Second best all over the pitch from the start Vale passed the ball confidently and swiftly and looked a couple of standards above our lot. We looked sadly today like relegation fodder no edge no creativity with that look of a team of strangers and all to familiar look of a doomed side heading in one direction. Their first goal was pretty typical of the type conceded when you are struggling down the bottom. A hotly disputed free kick awarded on the left side of the penalty area semi circle - the only person who thought it was a free kick was the ref who was booed continuously after the event. Struck directly into the wall and the ball was always going to fall to one of theirs and bang one nil. We created one or two chances before hand and tried to respond but could never penetrate a staunch Vale defence who had Zebs, Barnes and Thomson in their pockets for the entire ninety minutes though with the introduction of Benyon in the second half we were at least trying to pull their back line around a bit though with the exception of a good opportunist goal from Elliot, to little effect. There are some BIG questions now being asked by all supporters who are now concerned and the main worry is that we are now a squad of strangers that contain players that have no more ability than the ones released in the window. and we will have to rely on these players to turn our fortunes around. In conclusion we worked hard and huffed and puffed to little effect but looked like relegation fodder with my verdict on the players as follows. Poke injured his thigh and pulled off a good deflected reaction save in the first half and looked to have found some confidence. Smith looks better on the left cutting in when going forward and even he looks like he was struggling today. Camara. OK its his first game for a while but is he really any better than Nicho ? On this showing I dont think so!! Stevland Angus comes to mind. Charnock played well and looked solid enough alongside Branston who deservedly won the MOM . No passer of the ball admittedly but was no nonsense safety first at all times drove from the back but with nobody holding the ball upfront he was a very busy man. The midfield is where are problems have been all season in my honest opinion and we looked poor and lightweight compared to Vale in that department today. We just gave then so much room in the middle of the park to play their passing game it was almost like watching a friendly exhibition match at times. Mans did ok Wroe did OK but never rose to the heights to really influence the game and prompt some meaningful attacks. Okane looks a good prospect but that's all at this time and probably had his best game in a UTD shirt today but its so unfair to throw him into this and expect miracles its simply not going to happen. Thomson flatters to deceive and is so careless with the ball sometimes looked raw today missed a chance on goal in the first half firing wide from a cross just a few yards out. Cannot afford to play him at this time he was amazing the first time I saw him but one good game in ten isn't any good to any side. Zebs and to those who think hes a target man better think again he just didn't get a sniff today and struggled all game, didn't give up though. Barnes now I'm confused I really thought he would have had more about him after all the reports Ive been reading on here. An ok touch sure enough not that tall so wont win much up top and I didn't see to much to think that " This is the man to change our season" In time maybe but we are fast running out of that commodity. Now a word about Mr Bevan an imposing figure if ever there was one but lacks mobility and his kicking is questionable to say the least. Should he have done better for the second goal cross? Ill watch it later and decide. So more misery for us. The PB out brigade will no doubt be shouting from the roof tops once again and the decisions he made last month to release our "lucky charms" are going to come back and haunt him for the rest of his life if he doesn't manage to pull things around because in hindsight its now looking like the gamble to change our playing staff and style in mid season isn't going to pay off. Whatever Ill be there to the end and I cant wait for summer when I can forget this season and the club and get on with my bloody life again!!
|
|
Enzo
TFF member
Posts: 283
|
Post by Enzo on Feb 13, 2010 18:10:34 GMT
Are we in a better postion now, having made these changes than we were in December? Again, a matter of debate.
The loan system allows such flexibility nowadays that a manager who has contacts in the game, the backing of his board and an eye for the type of player required should be able to wheel and deal without getting into the ridiculous situation we currently find ourselves in. I dare say there will be at least one further addition to thesqaud this week - maybe another left back! Lets shuffle the pack again and see what happens. I am not calling for Buckle's head......yet. It is getting close to the point where the results will dictate what happens - possibly as early as after the Cheltenham game if we don't start looking like a team again.
I agree that it is not yet the time to panic - we still have time on our side and are assisted by the very poor quality of the teams below us. It is a time for everyone to stick together and let team spirit shine through - it is just a shame that he club has allowed some of this spirit to evaporate in place of a revolving door of loanees. One has to face facts - what has happened this season is Batesonesque and there is no point in hiding from it.
|
|
|
Post by loyalgull on Feb 13, 2010 18:22:26 GMT
i stayed to the very end and quite frankly it as woeful to say the least,and to make matters worse port vale aint no great shakes either,which pretty much somes us up.Apart from branston who gave his all and was very commanding,the level of performance is getting poorer by the game,we have definitely gone backwards as a team i am afraid,and i dont care what anybody else thinks thats my honest thought.Quite what buckle does now is anyones guess.The new lads barnes and camara are worse on this performance than we already had.Apart from a dizzy 5 minute spell in the second half which coincided with benyon coming on,we were poor fare,they wanted it more and we looked prepared to let them have it,all very very disappointing
|
|