|
Post by aussie on Feb 3, 2010 14:18:03 GMT
I agree he is the better keeper but in football sometimes you need to rest players to get them back strong again, I think Scott would be o.k. for a game or two but not for a prolonged period. Did you know players can experience what`s known as `burn out`and if you keep pushing them they get worse and worse, I`m not saying this is the case with our Micheal, I am just trying to show you why sometimes a rest can be good for them. You know when a player hasn`t played for ages but is physically fit they need game time, well the reverse can occur for players who haven`t had a break for ages and are physically and mentally tired! agreed,something else as well,if we could of humanly kept up our workrate in the second half as well as we did in the first half,we could be some side in the making,but pacing yourself is also part and parcel of the game as well We do look very good at full tilt, maybe some subs at the right time in key positions too freshen up the legs might go some way to helping that!
|
|
|
Post by hantsgull on Feb 3, 2010 15:31:35 GMT
As I commented last night it was very strange being over run last night. As Merse said this has never been one of those sites where we have felt the need for 6 posts to shout "4 minutes left" , "free kick" etc etc. This also coupled with a few "numptys" and the usual silly comments (nice to see you to see you nice-Brucie!!). Finally however we should also welcome some new visitors who added some very valid points and thoughts Sorry but I posted 2 minutes to go last night. I'll shut the door on my way out now........ I must too apologise then as I got involved in that. I put it down to my excitement and wish for the time to go as well as I really wanted us to win. As I said before, a lot of positives can be taken from last night and I look forward to seeing how we react on Saturday although it could be a long afternoon IF we get an early goal
|
|
|
Post by yorkgull on Feb 3, 2010 16:09:48 GMT
There's a couple of things I meant to mention last night but forgot in the haste for my pit... Before the game there was a guy on the pitch wandering around with a mic who got a couple of kids out of the away stand to wish happy birthday to one on the pitch, he also encouraged the Crewe fans to give us a round of applause for making the long journey after the postponement. He also interviewed the Crewe mascots so they had their moment in the sun. A nice touch that costs nothing and the kind of thing I would encourage to happen at Plainmoor. That is if everyone wasn't too busy sharpening their knives to pay attention to what's going on... The other thing is the Crewe fans booing. Christ they had it in for their number eleven (Lloyd?) who ended up being substituted to ironic cheers, the poor bugger. They were booing every long ball into the box that was cleared away towards the end as well.
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Feb 3, 2010 16:27:57 GMT
I think it was Joel Grant they were unhappy with. Personally, I was glad the nippy blighter was taken off. They seem to have been fed a diet of very good football to have booed that. They came up against a superior opposition. It just happens sometimes.
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Feb 3, 2010 16:33:52 GMT
Anyway some photos... including a couple of the Chippy described by Rob. Look out for the welcome sign! What a nice touch. £2.20 for battered sausage and chips. If that's the one in Gresty Road itself, it's been a legendary gaff for over thirty years! The Football Club used to own some of those houses in that street and one of them was the manager's! I spent a freezing Friday evening thereback in the eighties when the Alex were playing Peterborough United and they had a very young Bruce Grobbellar playing for them and he was awful! It was so cold the Alex directors invited anyone in the Main Stand and paddock in front to a free dash of brandy in their half time coffee......................a lovely touch from a club that didn't have two halfpennies to rub together at the time. Always nice people ~ proper football folk ~ and a lovely club who over time have gone from being the laughing stock of the Football League to something to be really proud of!
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Feb 3, 2010 16:53:25 GMT
It is the one in Gresty Road, merse. Home made fishcakes to die for. Very impressive. As were Chris' pics of a tidy ground for this level.
|
|
|
Post by wrangatongulls on Feb 4, 2010 22:13:19 GMT
Just to add to loyal gull and aussie regarding which is the best keeper, how can you compare them? poke is the shot stopper and to be fair very little else, Hes never comanded the box i guess being short ish dosnt help on that front (although paul cooper playing for the ipswhich in the late 70s and 80s seemed to manage pretty well) While bevan does everything else quite well but aint so hot on the shot stopping (being tall getting down can be tricky) i can think of a lot of games recently where having the ball plucked out of the air would of saved the susequent brilliant save from ever happening, neither well ever be the better they are so different in there abilitys, assuming they were both fit and up for action it would strike me that having them play according to the oppositions tactics would be best the defence would soon get to know both keepers and adapt to whoever was playing,
crewes stadium looked very impressive but give me a half full plainmoor any day wed get no atmosphere in a stand that big or am i just being pessimistic again?
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Feb 4, 2010 22:17:22 GMT
crewes stadium looked very impressive but give me a half full plainmoor any day wed get no atmosphere in a stand that big or am i just being pessimistic again? Its too big a stand for our needs, I would agree. Nothing pessimistic there. That stand alone probably holds more than Plainmoors current capacity. Very imposing for a local derby, though. Of which they'll get a few more than us.
|
|
|
Post by stewart on Feb 4, 2010 22:36:35 GMT
I have just watched the BBC website video of the Crewe game for the first time and am surprised that everyone is heaping so much blame on Michael Poke for their goal.
The ball was lumped so high in the air that it would have been impossible for him to have judged exactly where it was going to bounce. In that sense it is ridiculous to say that he should have rushed out to catch or punch it.
Branston clearly stopped running, believing that Poke would come for it, but their player kept running, presumably more in hope than expectation.
The ball then bounced higher than anyone could have expected, and their player outjumped Poke and nodded it away from him. It was much easier for him to gain height with his jump as he was still on the move. Poke, on the other hand, had to stop and then jump and try to punch owing to the bounce. There was also, of course, the danger that Poke could have jumped into their player and given away a penalty.
It was, in my opinion, a well taken opportunist goal, but assertions that (a) Poke should have come out further, (b) he simply stood still and (c) he allowed the ball to drop over his head, are simply not true.
|
|
chelstongull
TFF member
Posts: 6,759
Favourite Player: Jason Fowler
|
Post by chelstongull on Feb 5, 2010 9:14:01 GMT
It was, in my opinion, a well taken opportunist goal, but assertions that (a) Poke should have come out further, (b) he simply stood still and (c) he allowed the ball to drop over his head, are simply not true. That's the beauty of opinions Stewart!! I think Poke and Poke alone was at fault - however, he is well in credit on the points saved front. Me, I'm still having nightmares about it.
|
|
|
Post by aussie on Feb 5, 2010 11:33:20 GMT
I have just watched the BBC website video of the Crewe game for the first time and am surprised that everyone is heaping so much blame on Michael Poke for their goal. The ball was lumped so high in the air that it would have been impossible for him to have judged exactly where it was going to bounce. In that sense it is ridiculous to say that he should have rushed out to catch or punch it. Branston clearly stopped running, believing that Poke would come for it, but their player kept running, presumably more in hope than expectation. The ball then bounced higher than anyone could have expected, and their player outjumped Poke and nodded it away from him. It was much easier for him to gain height with his jump as he was still on the move. Poke, on the other hand, had to stop and then jump and try to punch owing to the bounce. There was also, of course, the danger that Poke could have jumped into their player and given away a penalty. It was, in my opinion, a well taken opportunist goal, but assertions that (a) Poke should have come out further, (b) he simply stood still and (c) he allowed the ball to drop over his head, are simply not true. As I`ve previously mentioned the ball could have come out of the flood lights from that hieght, but only Micheal knows for sure what happened! He might have just plain and simple miss-judged it, it might have been the bounce that did him, who knows apart from him! I still think it would not do him any harm to have a little rest for a game or two so he can freshen up and get back to the brilliant level of goal keeping we know he is capable of! And before anyone goes on about him being dropped, resting someone and dropping someone are two completely different things so think about it before you come back to this shooting from the hip!
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Feb 5, 2010 16:00:26 GMT
|
|