Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2018 23:30:37 GMT
TUST SEES OFF THE TUOSC, AS SUPPORTERS CLUB LEADER LASHES OUT AT TUST 'INTERFERENCE'
Brexit get's knocked off the front pages, and as there was 'no deal' forthcoming between TUST and TUOSC it seems as if one or other of them had to triumph. And in the end it was our old Lefty pals at TUST who applied the winning tactics. Along with other longstanding critical friends of TUST, I'm sure we'd all remind the Militants that a few crocodile tears would be in order, and perhaps a few words along the usual lines....you know the sort of thing, 'Disappointed to note the sad demise of TUOSC, enjoyed working with them etc etc' Quite how the TUOSC allowed itself to succumb to an old Hard Left tactic, isn't as yet clear. But it's not as if it hasn't been a current topic for a good long while now. Former KGB man Putin and the Russians are widely believed by many to have got what they wanted as regards the result of the U.S Presidential election by deploying interference tactics. Now TUOSC report that our far left friends at TUST have helped bring about tonight's announced downfall, also it seems, by the cunning use of interference.
While some of us will commiserate with Mr.Etherton and his fellow members of the now defunct TUOSC, it has to be acknowledged that when it comes to the dark arts, a number of Militants are particularly skilled. Remember also that they have been carefully cultivating friends in high places in readiness for the strategic and decisive battle over the Osborne Arena, and there's no denying that the Militants will be on a high as they stand over and gaze down upon the lifeless body of TUOSC. Commiserations have come in from the Player Manager of Mousehole AFC. That was a nice touch. But anyway you look at it TUOSC have been outflanked by TUST. TUOSC seem to have played the part of a jolly old moderate Labour MP, while TUST have assumed the part of Momentum with particular relish. TUOSC, you have been well and truly deselected ! Some will be worried that if TUST's interference can put paid to the TUOSC, does that mean that Liberals attempts to interfere with the status of Nightingale Park might also be successful ? Will we witness all sorts of meddling from local and national political figures trying to prevent construction of our new ground ? Well let's prepare for, and assume that they'll do their best in order to stop the project. 'Interference' might have contributed to bringing down TUOSC and even if the Militants are only partially successful, they can cause numerous delays to the process of getting our new stadium ratified. But now isn't the time to surrender in the face of the devious tactics we might be expecting to see ranged against us. While TUOSC members will have learnt the hard way, let the rest of us determine to be even more resolute and even more alert to interfering Militants trying to upset our clubs plans for a brighter future.
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Oct 17, 2018 23:48:18 GMT
I notice the first reason he cites for their resignations is “lack of support from TUFC”. Guessing we shouldn’t be surprised by that, though.
|
|
|
Post by mattgorman on Oct 18, 2018 9:28:07 GMT
I am writing this not as a TUST Board Member anymore, but as someone who has been involved with TUST for the last few years and hence this represents my own opinion and not that of the TUST Board.
As anyone who knows me would hopefully lay testament to, I consider myself to be a fairly measured individual who whilst an avid reader of the forums doesn't post unless I have something factual to say. I am not interested in the back and forth banter / arguments that some other posters seem to enjoy. However, I have felt the need this morning to post in response to the twitter comment from Bob Etherton of TUOSC that Alpine Joe has kindly posted in his latest essay on all things TUST. I have to say I am truly perplexed by the comment from Mr Etherton regarding the rationale behind the demise of the TUOSC.
Having been heavily involved with TUST of late including assisting with many great initiatives aimed at supporters I cannot understand the statement regarding "TUST Interference". The facts of the matter are that the TUST board and TUST supporters have actually moved foward of late and have implemented (with the help of other parties such as the TUCST) various initiatives including the Premier League FansZone (staffed on match days exclusively to date by the TUST Board, TUST Members and TUCST colleagues), The Matchday Ambassador Scheme, Legends Evening etc. TUST have also helped Sam Balsdon raise money for the Disabled Supporters Project and through the Legends Evening for the Torquay United Ladies Team. These are all initiatives over and above the great work that the TUST Board do behind the scenes engaging with the club and also ensuring the long term sustaibaility and protection of it.
To say that TUST interference is one of the reasons TUOSC has failed to prosper is completely untrue. From the moment Mr Etherton was appointed, the TUST Board have tried to involve TUOSC in various initiatives and have had no respose or interest at all. If interference means that TUST have got off the backsides and have actually done something then yes, maybe he is right. But I for one would make no apology for actually "doing something". We live in a democracy and everyone will have their own views on TUST and what it is trying to achieve. However, I can put my hand on heart and say that from the moment I have been involved there has never been anything other than a willingness to do all we can to ensure our club continues to exist and prosper. There is not a single person on the TUST board that wants anything other than this. That doesn't mean that you always get everything right, but please remember the people that sit behind these organisations are normal people who give up their time largely without thanks from anyone. Mistakes will be made along the way, but every action will be well intentioned. There is nobody on an ego trip, there are no left wing militants amongst the TUST Board much to Alpine Joe's possible disappointment.
However, I have always worked on the mantra that perception is reality and hence if TUST is viewed in a certain way by individuals then it is for TUST to try and overcome this and demonstrate why we exist and what our purpose is. This doesn't happen overnight, but if anyone were to read the TUST brochure we have recently put together or indeed take the time to speak with anyone from TUST, I fail to see how any TUFC supporter would not be aligned to the same objectives.
I feel Mr Etherton needs to reflect carefully on what he has said. It may well be that he is regretting taking on the role as Chairman of TUOSC. To be a Chairman or indeed play a role in any of these organisations is a thankless task and hence I can empathise with him, but the difference between the two organisations would appear to be that in Michel Thomas the TUST have a well intentioned and hard working Chairman who has built on the work of his predecessor Michael Goulbourne and has built a team of dedicated, hard working volunteers who only want to do the best they can for the club and its' supporters. The important thing is that the TUST Board that have been built are genuine supporters who have bought into the pupose of TUST and want to actually "do something positive". They are not just names who are part of a board for the sake of it. Each board member together with the sub-teams that Michel has implemented have roles to undertake and are willing to do this. Michel Thomas lives and breathes TUFC, he works tirelessly every single day (ask his wife!) and if I were him I would take these comments as an enormous kick in the teeth.
It is not a competition between the Supporters Club and TUST and it never has been. There never has been any anomosity directed at TUOSC from TUST and why would there be? Both organsations exist to provider for the supporters of our beloved club and to ensure its' long term future. There is no reason why both can't work together.
I find his comments very sad at this time when TUST are doing all they can to try and promote the club and its' supporters to the wider public.
Matt Gorman
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2018 11:28:27 GMT
So from that one incident we can derive that all young people are yobs. Maybe from your posts we can derive that all Buddhists are narrow minded, xenophobic, miserable old gits. Damn...how did I miss this post! That mere fact that I'm a Buddhist negates the the narrow minded bit...I must admit that I did once wear a T shirt with something about xenophobia on it during the transition from Rhodesia to Zimbabwe. Only because the Rhodesians were very xenophobic! Looking at the state of their once stunning country, I suppose you can understand why! The miserable old git thing...OK, I'll concede that!
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Oct 18, 2018 11:36:14 GMT
I am writing this not as a TUST Board Member anymore, but as someone who has been involved with TUST for the last few years and hence this represents my own opinion and not that of the TUST Board. As anyone who knows me would hopefully lay testament to, I consider myself to be a fairly measured individual who whilst an avid reader of the forums doesn't post unless I have something factual to say. I am not interested in the back and forth banter / arguments that some other posters seem to enjoy. However, I have felt the need this morning to post in response to the twitter comment from Bob Etherton of TUOSC that Alpine Joe has kindly posted in his latest essay on all things TUST. I have to say I am truly perplexed by the comment from Mr Etherton regarding the rationale behind the demise of the TUOSC. Having been heavily involved with TUST of late including assisting with many great initiatives aimed at supporters I cannot understand the statement regarding "TUST Interference". The facts of the matter are that the TUST board and TUST supporters have actually moved foward of late and have implemented (with the help of other parties such as the TUCST) various initiatives including the Premier League FansZone (staffed on match days exclusively to date by the TUST Board, TUST Members and TUCST colleagues), The Matchday Ambassador Scheme, Legends Evening etc. TUST have also helped Sam Balsdon raise money for the Disabled Supporters Project and through the Legends Evening for the Torquay United Ladies Team. These are all initiatives over and above the great work that the TUST Board do behind the scenes engaging with the club and also ensuring the long term sustaibaility and protection of it. To say that TUST interference is one of the reasons TUOSC has failed to prosper is completely untrue. From the moment Mr Etherton was appointed, the TUST Board have tried to involve TUOSC in various initiatives and have had no respose or interest at all. If interference means that TUST have got off the backsides and have actually done something then yes, maybe he is right. But I for one would make no apology for actually "doing something". We live in a democracy and everyone will have their own views on TUST and what it is trying to achieve. However, I can put my hand on heart and say that from the moment I have been involved there has never been anything other than a willingness to do all we can to ensure our club continues to exist and prosper. There is not a single person on the TUST board that wants anything other than this. That doesn't mean that you always get everything right, but please remember the people that sit behind these organisations are normal people who give up their time largely without thanks from anyone. Mistakes will be made along the way, but every action will be well intentioned. There is nobody on an ego trip, there are no left wing militants amongst the TUST Board much to Alpine Joe's possible disappointment. However, I have always worked on the mantra that perception is reality and hence if TUST is viewed in a certain way by individuals then it is for TUST to try and overcome this and demonstrate why we exist and what our purpose is. This doesn't happen overnight, but if anyone were to read the TUST brochure we have recently put together or indeed take the time to speak with anyone from TUST, I fail to see how any TUFC supporter would not be aligned to the same objectives. I feel Mr Etherton needs to reflect carefully on what he has said. It may well be that he is regretting taking on the role as Chairman of TUOSC. To be a Chairman or indeed play a role in any of these organisations is a thankless task and hence I can empathise with him, but the difference between the two organisations would appear to be that in Michel Thomas the TUST have a well intentioned and hard working Chairman who has built on the work of his predecessor Michael Goulbourne and has built a team of dedicated, hard working volunteers who only want to do the best they can for the club and its' supporters. The important thing is that the TUST Board that have been built are genuine supporters who have bought into the pupose of TUST and want to actually "do something positive". They are not just names who are part of a board for the sake of it. Each board member together with the sub-teams that Michel has implemented have roles to undertake and are willing to do this. Michel Thomas lives and breathes TUFC, he works tirelessly every single day (ask his wife!) and if I were him I would take these comments as an enormous kick in the teeth. It is not a competition between the Supporters Club and TUST and it never has been. There never has been any anomosity directed at TUOSC from TUST and why would there be? Both organsations exist to provider for the supporters of our beloved club and to ensure its' long term future. There is no reason why both can't work together. I find his comments very sad at this time when TUST are doing all they can to try and promote the club and its' supporters to the wider public. Matt Gorman Great post. Thanks for that and for the continued hard work carried out by TUST on behalf of it’s members and all supporters.
|
|
|
Post by torregull on Oct 18, 2018 12:27:51 GMT
Left wing militants and in-hoc with our Tory MP as well-that's an interesting political alliance, Alpine.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,225
|
Post by rjdgull on Oct 18, 2018 17:04:58 GMT
My thoughts are that every club needs a strong and vigilent Supporters Trust to protect the future and integrity of the fooball club; as illustrated by the events at Portsmouth and Wycombe to name only two. This is just as necessary in the good times as the bad: given the time and effort it takes to set up a Trust it is often too late to try setting one up when danger threatens. I believe Torquay Umited needs a Supporters Club which can provide the sort of social events that the fans clearly want. I believe the two entities need to be run separately as there is a potential conflict of interest if the trust runs the supporters club. Looking more closely at the letter, I'd like to know when the members gave the trust the authority to "evolve into a supporters club" in the first place? As far as I'm concerned, the trust should revert to being a trust immediately and support, from a distance, the creation of a fully-fledged supporters club which would be run by different "officers"; or the same officers if they resign from the trust's board.. My thoughts are that a supporters' organisation can only claim to have legitimacy and be representative of supporters if it has a decent number of members. Whilst a small number will sign a standing order and expect nothing in return, a lot of people will not bother if they see no return. From talking to supporters, there is a real desire for social events which involve people with the club - such as the events Lou has organised in the past. There is a school of thought that such activity is beneath the dignity of a Supporters' Trust - which should concern itself with far more important things than supporters. It's not one I agree with. Yes, the Trust needs to be kept going ready for the day when we may need to rally the troops for battle. But if we look down our noses at the troops, there won't be any left to rally come the glorious day. I don't think there is a conflict in whether to work with the club or not. The Trust can plough a straight line - to further the cause of TUFC and to place the club at the heart of the community. If the club's board has the same goals, the supporters can pull in the same direction as the board. That's not forelock-tugging, it's common sense. If the club's board goes in the opposite direction, then the Trust can confront them. I think any supporters' organisation should be inclusive and focus on what we all have in common rather than be divisive. I do recall Chris Roberts trying hard to get a Supporters' Club going when he sensed the growing strength of the Trust. Divide and rule. On the other hand, if the Trust is going to be paralysed by fear of looking anything like an organisation that might encourage members to enjoy themselves - maybe it should just go into mothballs. One problem with TUST is the lack of officers. Splitting in two will double the need for officers. How will that work then? Interesting reading the start of this thread from 6 years ago with many of those posts even more relevant today and particularly with the hit in our support not enough “manpower” to maintain 2 organisations. Pity that a supporter organisation is blaming the other for its demise by existing and being proactive. Great post from Matt, spot on
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,225
|
Post by rjdgull on Oct 18, 2018 17:08:31 GMT
Left wing militants and in-hoc with our Tory MP as well-that's an interesting political alliance, Alpine. Quite. He likes to make the odd caricature or two does our Joe.
|
|
|
Post by gullone on Oct 19, 2018 15:33:11 GMT
I believe Torquay Umited needs a Supporters Club which can provide the sort of social events that the fans clearly want. I believe the two entities need to be run separately as there is a potential conflict of interest if the trust runs the supporters club. Looking more closely at the letter, I'd like to know when the members gave the trust the authority to "evolve into a supporters club" in the first place? As far as I'm concerned, the trust should revert to being a trust immediately and support, from a distance, the creation of a fully-fledged supporters club which would be run by different "officers"; or the same officers if they resign from the trust's board.. I and others joined the latest version of the TUFC supporters club precisely because we dont agree with TUSTs ulitmate preferred end game of community ownership for this football club and of course the TUST and Supporters Club need to be run separately. I was also under the impression that referring to the TUST as a glorified supporters club was a heinous crime ! Everyone is aware that we have a split fan base like no other about the way forward and theres nothing wrong with that. So i shall happily take my place tomorrow amongst the supposedly apathetic hordes who have the audacity not to join the TUST.....COYY
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2018 15:38:52 GMT
With Wednesday v Middlesbrough on the box, and now being joined by the counter attraction of live coverage of Sticker v Mousehole via Facebook, I asked my co-conspirators if there was a possibility of moving our usual Friday night pub get together forward to Thursday ? Thankfully my request was agreed to, and we threw around observations on some favourite usual subjects: Brexit, global warming, transgenderism (prompted by the employment of a new ‘barmaid’ a couple of months ago) etc, over a couple of pints. It was only when we moved on to other topical news: What’s happened to Khashoggi and who’s behind his death/disappearance, followed by what happened to TUOSC and who’s really responsible for their death/disappearance, that the similarities between the two cases started to become evident. No confirmation that Khashoggi is actually dead, but an inspection of the Saudi Embassy revealed it to be very clean, without a speck of blood to be seen, and notably no sign or trace of Khashoggi. Enter the TUFC Official Website and still no admission that TUOSC is not alive and breathing somewhere. But click on the Supporters Club link and you’ll notice that room has been hurriedly whitewashed. Neat clean and white….but, tellingly, no evidence of the TUOSC in there either. ‘But surely, being their own Supporters Club, TUFC should have stood up for them and offered protection from interference or bullying?, one of our number naively asked. After some laughter, and being asked if he was suggesting that TUFC should have imposed sanctions against TUST to deter it’s alleged interfering with the Official Supporters Club, our misguided mate had his attention drawn to the profound observation made on the subject by Rob: 'I notice the first reason he cites for their resignations is “lack of support from TUFC”. Guessing we shouldn’t be surprised by that, though'.With the West dependent on the Saudi’s and so anxious not to displease them, is it any wonder we’re so quick to lower flags to half mast or turn a blind eye to the mass killing of the people of Yemen ? We can perhaps, mildly signal our disapproval, but at the same time be careful not to any imply that we are claiming the leaders of Saudi Arabia are in any way responsible, or gave the orders for Khashoggi to meet a grizzly end. Evidence that top Saudi rulers issued orders relating to Khashoggi are just not going to come to light. Others lower down might have been careless enough to speculate on their desire to get the electric bonecutters to him, but no need for the rulers to be foolish enough to have that on the record. Look back over the many months of anti TUOSC posts across the forums. And whether you conclude that it be the Militant who actually makes the post expressing his desire that TUOSC suffer a long slow death, or the lack of any TUST member taking issue or disassociating themselves from such divisive remarks towards a fellow Supporters Group that is the most telling, the TUST leadership can sit back and observe, while claiming it’s not actually their fingerprints on the actual post. ‘There never has been any animosity directed at TUOSC by TUST’ claimed one recent contributor. And in the very narrow sense of asking the top table to hold their hands up, then you’ll see that those hands are clean. The barrage of animosity that most of us cannot fail to have read, will of course not have originated by actual TUST officials themselves, but will much more likely be almost entirely Militant generated. But as we analyse each situation, it’s clear where the influence and power lies. Be it the death of Khashoggi or the death of TUOSC, there will be those taking into account the bigger picture and weighing up the consequences for their own interests. For the sake of argument and hypothetically speaking, what if Crown Prince Riviera bin Macron and his TUST courtiers have played a part in the strange and as yet not fully explained death of TUOSC. Firstly their reluctance to admit such guilt can hardly be a surprise, but wouldn’t the football club understandably feel it had more to lose than to gain by making an issue out of the crime. The probable official line of turning a blind eye as much as possible is surely also the pragmatic one. Crown Prince Riviera bin Macron has elbowed his way to the very forefront of the ‘Local Authority’ decision regarding the Osborne Arena’s construction (or otherwise). Wouldn’t it be counter productive to make an issue out of, or hold an enquiry into, the ‘interference’ allegations at this time. Whether or not they hold water, and irrespective of how great a part they may have played (if true) in bringing down TUFC’s own Supporters Club. Annoy TUST and you most probably annoy the Crown Prince. TUFC officials will surely attempt to keep their heads down and hope the whole thing blows over. Given the crucial stage that we’re approaching as regards the new stadium, the old adage of ‘keeping your friends close, but your enemies even closer’ must resonate with club officials, even as they try to placate an angry or upset Mr.Etherton or disappointed TUOSC members. Similarly the U.S Administration and British Government will take a longer view as they weigh up the strategic value of throwing their hands up in horror at Khashoggi being bumped off. Even if guilty of the ‘interference’ charges made against them by TUOSC, I would still expect TUST be be given a free pass by the club on this. The alleged negative involvement in the demise of a fellow Supporters organisation may have blackened TUST’s reputation in the eyes of some, at least until any evidence emerges to either substantiate the claim, or conversely to clear TUST’s name. But I see it doing no substantial harm to the Lib/TUST/Macron opposition alliance, or any lasting damage to the future of TUST.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,225
|
Post by rjdgull on Oct 19, 2018 16:50:54 GMT
I and others joined the latest version of the TUFC supporters club precisely because we dont agree with TUSTs ulitmate preferred end game of community ownership for this football club and of course the TUST and Supporters Club need to be run separately. I was also under the impression that referring to the TUST as a glorified supporters club was a heinous crime ! Everyone is aware that we have a split fan base like no other about the way forward and theres nothing wrong with that. So i shall happily take my place tomorrow amongst the supposedly apathetic hordes who have the audacity not to join the TUST.....COYY Pity that is the perception because I don’t believe that TUST’s preferred end game is community ownership but rather to provide a fail safe in times of stress. I think all supporters want the best for the club, how that can be achieved is up for debate but we are ultimately all on the same side.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,225
|
Post by rjdgull on Oct 19, 2018 16:53:43 GMT
Alpine - you draw some of your parallels at right angles but your post made me smile if nothing else.
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Oct 19, 2018 19:56:17 GMT
Everyone is aware that we have a split fan base like no other So i shall happily take my place tomorrow amongst the supposedly apathetic hordes who have the audacity not to join the TUST.....COYY Each to their own. It’s not apathetic or supposedly apathetic to support us. It’s proactive. It’s the lifeblood. Some of the benefits of a supporters club can be found in things like Legends nights and other examples, so I hope you are still able to enjoy them when organised. They are for everyone. This Premier League grant for fans zones. For everyone. Plenty of other examples that can continue or happen if they are desired. I think Rob rjd is right that most TUST members simply want a safety net for the ‘just in case’, so that their club may still exist beyond nefarious, poor or no willing ownership. I’m astonished to read a TUOSC member or any fan for that matter regarding us as having ‘a split fan base like no other’?? Like no other? Seems strong. Ironically, something I would disagree with. There’s a heck of a lot in common, too. We all want the best for the club. Whether we belong to either, both or neither of the organisations/former organisation matters not as we support Torquay United first and foremost. That’s why we’re on these forums and why we rock up to games. That support happened long before joining an organisation became an option to consider for me and I suspect, most, if not all of us. Supporter engagement has not been a feature of this ownership unless to release a statement about a new stadium or plans for such followed by silence. In this context and those we have previously read where supporters have tried to engage with the club’s ownership, we now read that TUOSC felt let down by the club. Is it any wonder their former chairman feels that way? Can’t have been easy when your raison d’etre is that of an official supporters club. Strikes at the very heart. On a separate and unconnected (to TUST and TUOSC) note, it wouldn’t surprise me if someone at GI felt it a good idea to have a supporter ‘organisation’ somewhere down the line that cited freeholds and new Stadia as the way to go. The Allam’s at Hull who are pissing off wouldn’t have minded that sort of divide and rule, I’m sure. Thankfully for that club, the freehold remains with someone not pissing off. The local authority. AJ could be a bold choice to front a GI Supporters Club, but I’m sure it would be on the proviso he promised to keep Brexit, Trump, Speedway, Greyhounds, the House of Saud and Gender peripheral to the business of getting houses built. Can’t see him agreeing to that gagging order, mind.
|
|
|
Post by plainmoorpete on Oct 20, 2018 8:24:21 GMT
In reply to rjdgull's comment "Pity that is the perception because I don't believe that TUST's preferred end game is community ownership but rather to provide a fail safe in times of stress". What exactly does that mean? The trust can only exist for one of two reasons; either to facilitate the change in ownership to a community owned club or to exist solely as a protest body. I fail to see what providing a "fail safe in times of stress" actually means. I guess the retiring TUOSC chairman's accusation of interference from TUST actually refers to the Fanzone. It should be remembered that TUOSC could not have provided this because a condition of its funding meant that only an outside body could run it. Never the less the involvement of TUST with the Fanzone does give the impression of TUST trying to become a supporters club, as does the organisation of legends evenings, which I actually thought was a means of boosting attendance at their AGM. Under TUST's previous chairmanship they stated that they were not a supporters club and had no intention to provide a social outlet, but of course things change. The undoubted aim of TUST in the past was to obtain ownership of the club but this was not obtainable, so it now looks like TUST is morphing into a supporters club because it can't achieve anything else. Also I disagree with the statement "We have a split can base like no other..." ; yes the fan base is split, but that isn't unique or unusual. The fan base is a collection of individuals whose common denominator is supporting TUFC but beyond that there is no reason to expect any coming together of minds on any particular subject. That is the same at all clubs. Do not forget that both TUST and TUOSC only ever represented a fraction of supporters.
|
|
rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,225
|
Post by rjdgull on Oct 20, 2018 9:01:50 GMT
These are all initiatives over and above the great work that the TUST Board do behind the scenes engaging with the club and also ensuring the long term sustaibaility and protection of it. I can put my hand on heart and say that from the moment I have been involved there has never been anything other than a willingness to do all we can to ensure our club continues to exist and prosper. There is not a single person on the TUST board that wants anything other than this. There is nobody on an ego trip, there are no left wing militants amongst the TUST Board much to Alpine Joe's possible disappointment. However, I have always worked on the mantra that perception is reality and hence if TUST is viewed in a certain way by individuals then it is for TUST to try and overcome this and demonstrate why we exist and what our purpose is. This doesn't happen overnight, but if anyone were to read the TUST brochure we have recently put together or indeed take the time to speak with anyone from TUST, I fail to see how any TUFC supporter would not be aligned to the same objectives. The important thing is that the TUST Board that have been built are genuine supporters who have bought into the pupose of TUST and want to actually "do something positive". They are not just names who are part of a board for the sake of it. Each board member together with the sub-teams that Michel has implemented have roles to undertake and are willing to do this. Florida, I think your perception of TUST is wrong and Matt in parts of his post clearly counters that perception. I think that community ownership has been put forward quite strongly as an option twice in the last few years and will do so again which has led to that perception which is not the case.
|
|