Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2011 14:59:11 GMT
DTG, a serious question (or two), what is it about Buckle you don't like (taking into consideration his fantastic achievements over the past 4 years) and want makes you think anyone coming in will be a better manager? Chelston those are good questions and I think there are others worth posing to anyone who is so implacably resistant to the club's current manager. Or, indeed, to the “fluffies” who think each manager is wonderful. Firstly, if you don't like this manager what did you think of his predecessors? Which ones did you rate or not? How do they compare with the present incumbent? Now, given our record over the years - and the relatively high turnover of managers - nobody is going to offer a 100% approval rating for all of our managers unless they are particularly impressionable. What would you expect as a typical response: approval towards a third; indifference towards another third; disapproval of the remainder? That's sounds too simple a formula to me but you get my drift. Indeed, mindful of how you can never remotely please all the supporters all the time - and how that the majority of football clubs are unsuccessful at any one time (by definition) - I'd guess the historical disapproval rating is often in excess of one-third. Nowhere more so, I suspect, than here at the scruffy end of the Football League. Nonetheless I know people - personally rather than online - who are apparently happy to slag off every manager, irrespective of their success or otherwise. And, remembering what eventually happens to most football managers, these people usually end up saying "I told you so" in a rather smug fashion. Secondly, it might be worth enquiring of what we think of managers in general? Is football management all a bit amateurish? Or are they doing a good job but are eventually undone because of fate and the fact that only a certain number can be successful at a time? I've always made the point that if the world's finest managers are invited to manage in the South Devon Premier en bloc, two will get relegated. Equally, if twenty of us from this site are hired by Premier League clubs, one of us will win the title. Not sure what this proves - it won't happen of course - other than it's easier to make relative judgements than absolute ones. Or is the way we view the football manager linked to our own psychology?. Are some of us more willing to give them a chance? Are others generally suspicious of management and authority figures (bosses, referees, politicians, etc) and the extent of their influence, motives and capability? Or are we merely conditioned to be disapproving as an essential part of football culture?
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Jan 2, 2011 15:48:09 GMT
A few very interesting questions you have asked there Nick.
As someone who happens to like and support Paul Buckle I can’t really answer your first question as such. I would say that is he is not my all time top favourite manager, but that is not to take away from him, all he as achieved in his short managerial career.
I just loved our Leroy and that one fantastic season he gave us and I always felt he was a decent honest man working under very difficult conditions under Bateson. But as a fan of a small seaside town, there was something special when we had Bruce Ricoh and then Cyril Knowles as our mangers.
I think it was more to do with the fact they were such big well know names and here they were at our club and that somehow made our club seem to much bigger and important than it really was. It was much the same feeling when Norman Medhurst left Chelsea to come and work for little old Torquay United while he was still also part of the England team setup.
I actually feel a bit for Paul Buckle as I know he has never really understood why some fans have been so against him. He is human like all the rest of us and has been hurt by some of the treatment some TUFC fans have handed out to him. Does that just go with the territory? Something you just have to accept might happen when you become a football manager?
On to your second question.
Many fans always feel they can do a far better job than the manager is doing. They may feel the manager has once again picked the wrong team, made the wrong substitutions, or got the tactics all wrong for the game. So in all of us there may be a manager trying to get out and the thing is, unless we were actually doing the job, we would never know all the reasons the manager went with the team he did etc.
I remember Sean whose company once were sponsors of the club, telling me just what a real problem is was for any manager, when he had a dressing room full of male testosterone to try and keep in check. I think it’s far too easy for any fan who feels he can do a better job, to make such claims without knowing what the job really entails.
I suppose the question should be asked if it should matter to any manager if the fans liked him or not, I’m sure there has been plenty in the past who would not care one way or the other. In the end I suppose it just comes own to the sort of person the manager was, some will want to be liked and others won’t care two hoots.
What makes a popular manager? Well success on the pitch has to be top of the list for sure, but an open an honest manager who is not afraid to say he got it wrong, will always be one fans warm to. The ones ho always make the same excuses or always blame the ref for results, soon find fans taking a dislike to them.
There is another question I suppose; can a manager always be liked by the fans? Well Leroy found out that was not the case, loved to bits one season and public enemy the next one.If Paul Buckle was to stay here for a few more seasons would he eventually win over all he fans? Never in a month Sundays as there will always be some fans on any managers back no matter how good a manager he is.
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Jan 2, 2011 17:42:03 GMT
Well Leroy found out that was not the case, loved to bits one season and public emery the next one. You are right Dave. I can remember the bloke behind me shouting out "You are awful" during that Rochdale game.
|
|
Rob
TFF member
Posts: 3,607
Favourite Player: Asa Hall
|
Post by Rob on Jan 2, 2011 19:32:09 GMT
..... but he liked him.
|
|
hector
TFF member
Posts: 1,311
|
Post by hector on Jan 2, 2011 19:58:52 GMT
I started watching watching TQY during the 1979/80 season when that Turner, Murphy, Cooper, Lawrence team was at it's peak. As a child and being less cynical than I am now, it never occured to me that Torquay should change their manager. I just hoped and hoped that it would go well. It was the following season that I remember the slow hand-claps and the Pop Side shouting 'Green Out' that I remember finding this distressing and I felt so sorry for Green crumpled in the dug-out having to listen to it all.
It was only later that i realised that sometimes a manager is just either unlucky, crap, does not fit in and so needs to leave.
Sadly, especially under Bateson we suffered too many turkeys as managers. People like Compton, Saunders, Cornforth should never never have been anywhere near the managers job.
However, here is my quick overview of managers in charge since I have been watching.
Mike Green: built that wonderful team that then collapsed to 9th place but for me I could never decry Green for the joy and fondness for which I remember that team.
Frank O'Farrell: I thought as a 12 year-old his appointment would guarantee promotion. based on his previous record...but some years before, perhaps the directors did too but after 3 opening wins it becamse a montonous season and it was no loss when he retired.
Bruce Rioch: I think most Torquay fans at the time recognised we had a potentially excellent manager on our hands. As a kid Bruce Rioch to me was like Roy Race. A World Cup captain and super player. I was devastated when he left and the circumstances which forced his resignation. Really sad but was delighted for him when he achieved so much later on.
Dave Webb: I hated him from the very beginning. He was taking over from my hero and dismantled the team and filled it with Boiurnemouth rejects. The kit, the badge, the stand, the bottom place finishes. Hated him.
John Sims: Sort of appointment that Bateson might have made. You see many clubs make appointments like this when a despot is in charge. It never works out. Probably stayed about 32 days too long.
Stuart Morgan: So wanted it to work out for him. Nice bloke but ultimately I can remember thinking he needed to go. What Cyril then did with basically the same team bore that out.
Cyril Knowles: A legend for me. He did not manage what two later managers did but I think after the misery of the previous few years that 1987/88 season was an absolute dream. To even be near promotion, yet alone nearly get it, plus beating Spurs and the FA Cup run and thrashing Coventry in a 0-2 defeat. Probably my favourite season ever, even though it ended so sadly.
Dave Smith: I think Bateson probably wanted to make his mark. Smith should have been left alone to manage the team and it was really sad when he left.
John Impey: First of Bateson's many cheap yes-men. Despite him getting us over the line for promotion, I never felt he was up to managing at the level (League 1) were acquired.
Wes Saunders: He was caretaker for so long, that he can sort of be counted as a manager. Ridiculous decision. Surely it could not be repeated.
Ivan Golac: On a hiding to nothing really. We were so far adrift that there was little he could do and then he quickly left.
Paul Compton: I just never, could never, have never and will never understand this appointment. Utter stupidity and neglect of duty by Bateson. A disgraceful decision. I could never abide Compton.
Neil Warnock: Though officially a consultant he was technically the manager. Brilliant. Would have loved it if he could have stayed but was never going to happen and I guess there would never have been room for his and Bateson's egos.
Don O'Riordan: I liked Don O. Think he was shafted by Bateson really. Having to start that fateful 95/96 season with forwards like Byng and Laight, a team phot that only had 13 players including the physio and a departed Greg Goodridge. O'Riordan was a victim of his own success. That 94 play-off team was constructed on a shoestring so Bateson I think thought it could always be done that way. History will judge O'Riordan by that 1-8 defeat but it should not be so harsh. In fact Bateson himself says sacking Don O was his biggest regret of his time at Torquay.
Mick Buxton: For one game in the cup v Orient. Probably the best manager we never had. Really hoped we would get him. At the same time gary Megson wanted the Torquay job. Instead we got...
Eddie May: Just reminded me of Dave Webb. A cockney spiv and similarly awful.
Kevin Hodges: Did a great job but again when only offered a one-year deal by Bateson, it did not surprise me that he accepted a 2-year one offered by Plymouth. Since leaving us, he has not done much and I really hope people are not serious in suggesting he could be a candidtae should Buckle leave.
Wes Saunders: Why? Why did we even go there? Again! Only Torquay at that time with Bateson on his self-imposed 'gardening leave' and puppet Benney pretending to be in charge could we make this joke appointment. Saunders was cheerleading the fans at the start of the play-off final, with Helen Chamberlain. She could not have been a worse appointment. He was working in clothes factory and playing for a pub team when he got the Torquay job. Utter madness and predictably he was crap. Even worse was the knowledge that Micky Adams wanted the job. Nobody in their right mind would choose Saunders over Adams, excpet soemone who wanted a puppet in charge.
Colin Lee: Saved us from Saunders shambles. What happened over that summer was a shambles too. I really hoped we would get him as he seemed forward thinking and ambitious. I guess that sort of attitude did not sit well with Bateson.
Roy McFarland: Did a brilliant job really when you consider what he inherited and how little time he had to sign players and build a team. And what a team he left for us.
Leroy Rosenior: I thought we had a manager who was going to manage at the top level during those first two years. Even the season we were relegated I could see was more down to budget than incompetence. But the lack of contacts, the whole living in Bristol thing complicated things. never understood the hostility some have towards the manager - one of only 3 - to lead us to automatic promotion but likewise I would not be one of those calling for him to return.
John Cornforth: Utterly pointless, lazy, stupid appointment. Appoint someone like that and what do you expect. exactly what we got.
Ian Atkins: Not everyone's cup of tea but I liked what he did for us. A miracle that he managed to save Bateson's bacon that season.
Lubrik whatever...cannot even remember his name: Appointed Hancox as assistant because they 'hit it off looking around Torquay' apparantly. Was a puppet. Useless but felt sorry for him.
Keith Curle: Was a harsh environment and set of circumstances to judge him on. But I wouldn't want him back.
Paul Buckle: Has done very well for us. I worry that he is too abrasive at times and falls out with players but history has proved him to be correct on more occasions than not. Would not want to see him go.
|
|
Jon
Admin
Posts: 6,912
|
Post by Jon on Jan 4, 2011 22:39:29 GMT
I know people - personally rather than online - who are apparently happy to slag off every manager, irrespective of their success or otherwise. And, remembering what eventually happens to most football managers, these people usually end up saying "I told you so" in a rather smug fashion. Barton’s observation here is spot on. A small club like Torquay has never had and never will have a prolonged period of unbridled success, so for anybody who is desperate “to be proved right” it is a safe bet to moan that it is all going to go wrong and then just wait to be proved right. The other thing to bear in mind is that a high proportion of forum posters are more into rhetoric than analysis. This means always taking a strong pro- or anti- position and then selectively taking into account only things that support the theory whilst ignoring counter-arguments. In my time watching Torquay, three managers have achieved promotion – Impey, Rosenior and Buckle. Three more have reached the play-offs – Knowles, O’Riordan and Hodges. With the exception of Knowles, all were first time “novice” managers. It seems to me (perhaps someone could check the stats) that the majority of clubs doing exceptionally well at lower league level have done so with hungry young managers rather than “been round the block” older managers. Eddie Howe would be a prime example. It would always be difficult for a club like Torquay to attract a manager who is both vastly experienced AND successful – as such a character would be gainfully employed elsewhere. I do tend to think that quite a lot of revisionist history has tended to overplay the successes of experienced managers of TUFC at the expense of younger managers – with Smith and McFarland the main beneficiaries to the detriment of Impey and Rosenior.
|
|
wolfie
TFF member
UTW
Posts: 659
|
Post by wolfie on Jan 5, 2011 9:54:34 GMT
The managers I can recall at Wolves
Graham Taylor- Never given a fair amount of time but did commit blasphomey (I think that's how you spell it) by trying to sell Steve Bull
Mark Mcghee- The only remarkable thing about his reign was he could remember the names of all the players he signed
Colin Lee- Did his best but not good enough. Was glad to see him go
(Sir) Dave Jones- Has my respect and I was genuinly sad to see him go. Had no chance of keeping us up but we beat Man U at least
Glenn Hoddle- Less said about this guy the better. Champagne corks were popping in Wolverhampton when he left
And finally
I like Mick McCarthy and am grateful for everything he has done for Wolves... However I am concerned that he spent £16m in the summer but still plays virtually the same team from the championship! I really hope he can turn things around and keep us up again but I have to say I feel next season maybe a change is needed regardless of what division we end up in as I do not feel that MM can take us any further.... Now I want him to prove me wrong
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2011 13:43:49 GMT
Good postings on this thread. I’ll start with Dave. ...as a fan of a small seaside town, there was something special when we had Bruce Rioch and then Cyril Knowles as our mangers. I think it was more to do with the fact they were such big well known names and here they were at our club and that somehow made our club seem to much bigger and important than it really was. Football fans certainly like “pedigree” and “glamour” and, amongst players, we’re led to believe there’s a “show us your medals” mentality when assessing the merits of a manager. But history suggests considerable numbers of ex-players – some more famous than others – have made pretty lousy managers. Equally we know ordinary players can make great managers. But it’s true we make judgements on the background, roots and “previous" of each appointment. I remember being pleased when a new man arrived who had plenty of experience of the league in which we were playing (the Conference) as well as that to which we aspired (League Two). The fact he lived locally (Shaldon), had gained a strong reputation at a comparable club (Exeter City) and was, I assumed, within our budget made him an entirely logical appointment in my book. Yet there was a diametrically opposite response: cheap and convenient; no management experience; and - devastatingly - “if he’s not good enough to be Exeter’s manager; he’s not ****ing good enough to be ours!” On a wider note, I sense certain aspects of football management are becoming more professional (although we’ll always find it hard to draw conclusions because overall results remain the same: so many winners; so many losers). But, for many years, I thought much of the recruitment process was mindless: “Oh he’s played a bit; he’s a good lad; he’ll get on with it; he’ll do”. The apparent ineptitude of so many managers even made me wonder whether there were people outside of professional football who could do just as good a job as – or better – than many ex-players. But, even if this was true in theory, I always sensed the internal culture of the sport would overwhelm these “non-football people” (as the game loves to label them) just as they would be sitting targets in the eyes of the media and supporters. Nonetheless it’s a fascinating concept and I’ve tried to make comparisons with my time in a profession which was traditionally managed by people who’d done the job rather than by managers hired from outside. Some of the existing managers were good; others were dreadful. Nor was there a direct correlation between how they had performed earlier in their careers and how they ran the service. Eventually I reached the point where I believed we should recruit generic managers from elsewhere. But, when they arrived, they weren’t any better than what we had. Or was our judgement of them clouded by our own somewhat resentful “dressing room” culture? It was much the same feeling when Norman Medhurst left Chelsea to come and work for little old Torquay United while he was still also part of the England team setup. Going off the point, I remember being relatively unimpressed by Norman Medhurst’s England credentials. This was because I thought (rightly or wrongly) that much of what surrounded the FA’s England set-up was amateurish, with many positions being a sinecure for friendly faces from the London area. And, in Norman’s case, did it help to be “Harry’s Boy” following in the footsteps of his father? I suspect I couldn't have been more wrong and, in all of my years supporting Torquay United, I doubt if too many figures have been held in higher regard than Norman Medhurst. And, if you look at the clip at www.britishpathe.com/record.php?id=73452 (once you’ve suffered the lead-in advert) you’ll see his dad was also a dab hand with short-wave diathermy, ultrasonic and vibrating auto-massage machines. But it begs a question as to the way football physiotherapy has changed over the years: new techniques; greater use of qualified personnel; more female physios; less emphasis on old pros. A possible sub-topic for a future fans forum event featuring physios from different eras? Many fans always feel they can do a far better job than the manager is doing. They may feel the manager has once again picked the wrong team, made the wrong substitutions, or got the tactics all wrong for the game. So in all of us there may be a manager trying to get out and the thing is, unless we were actually doing the job, we would never know all the reasons the manager went with the team he did etc. And isn’t this what makes watching football so different from hopping off to watch the tennis at Wimbledon or spending a night at the opera? We’re told it’s a simple game; we have personal experience of it (invariably exaggerated); we operate in a largely "I know what I'm talking about" macho environment. It’s almost like following politics – constant opinion and perception set against a largely dismissive and sceptical culture. For example in football: the managers and players are often useless; the referees and administrators are always incompetent. Ah, but if this were true, how would matches, clubs and leagues even begin to function? It can’t possibly be so bad, can it? Well, I guess we have a choice as to how we deal with this apparent gap between perception and reality: we either remain loftily above it all; act it out as part of the theatre; enjoy it as part of the craic; or simply realise we're a tad biased but that's football, life and human beings. Equally, of course, we may be oblivious to any gap between reality and perception and genuinely contend that all referees and administrators are fools; most of our own players and managers are clueless; all opponents cheat; and that the Gods of Football (and their co-conspirators) are lined up shoulder-to-shoulder against our poor, defenceless club. Either way, it beats the Opera, doesn’t it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2011 14:15:23 GMT
I started watching watching TQY during the 1979/80 season when that Turner, Murphy, Cooper, Lawrence team was at it's peak. As a child and being less cynical than I am now, it never occurred to me that Torquay should change their manager. I just hoped and hoped that it would go well. It was the following season that I remember the slow hand-claps and the Pop Side shouting 'Green Out' that I remember finding this distressing and I felt so sorry for Green crumpled in the dug-out having to listen to it all. That’s a lovely starting point for an excellent historical analysis from Hector which pretty much fits my own view of the managers of the last thirty years. Maybe I’m in danger of falling into “invented memory” syndrome but Eric Webber had been in post for twelve years when I first watched Torquay United. As a child I could have been half-excused for thinking he had the same security of tenure as, say, the manager of the town’s waterworks. "Well, he’ll carry on to sixty-five, won’t he?" might have been something my grandma would have said and even my father - not the most patient of supporters - might have been quietly sorry to have seen the departure of Eric. I’m half-tempted to tot-up Hector’s analysis of managers as "good, bad or indifferent" and plot the results on a bar graph. How then would they compare to others' perceptions? Note how Hector also reveals how his opinion of certain managers changed as time passed and how some appointments didn’t make sense from the start. My theory is that every football manager, everywhere, starts with a Initial Disapproval Rating based on the percentage of the support which is essentially “anti” at the time of his appointment. Human nature as it is, let’s say this figure is at least 5% irrespective of the manager or the club. Some Plainmoor managers (Bruce Rioch for example?) would have started close to this mythical figure; others (Compo?) would have commenced with a relatively high Disapproval Rating. And what of Paul Buckle? Well, had he been a Mike Bateson appointment, I suspect he would have experienced a high initial Disapproval Rating: cheap; local; too much in the mould of Compton, Saunders, etc. But, as he was appointed by those we appeared to respect (Colin Lee and the new owners) I guess his rating would have been healthier. Yet, I fear the “if he’s not good enough to be Exeter’s manager; he’s not ****ing good enough to be ours!” viewpoint might have added a few percentage points. Then there is the Mounting Disapproval Rating which, if it could be measured, shows how the mood towards a manager changes over time. Once this goes above a certain rate it becomes noticeable; beyond another scale point disapproval almost becomes endemic. I imagine Don O’Riordan and Leroy would be excellent case studies. In fact the disapproval rating at the point of departure would also make for interesting analysis. Plenty of managers have left with many fans being against them; few have left when their approval rating was relatively high.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2011 15:04:56 GMT
I do tend to think that quite a lot of revisionist history has tended to overplay the successes of experienced managers of TUFC at the expense of younger managers – with Smith and McFarland the main beneficiaries to the detriment of Impey and Rosenior. And Ian Atkins too? Not that we'll ever know. One of the "Big Ifs" of recent years I guess. Had the events of May/June 2007 turned out less-fortunately I’m sure that, in time, Atkins may have been seen (rightly or wrongly) as the man who could have stayed to perform miracles. Furthermore, I sense Atkins may have been the preferred option of some who are less well-disposed to Paul Buckle, partly because he appears to be PB’s antithesis (which, I think, begs questions: what was Atkins like at Buckle’s age? What will Buckle be like when he’s Atkins’ age? Similar or dissimilar?) Of course it’s impossible to answer the “what if Atkins had stayed?” question. I suspect that, as with any other manager, there would have been the usual variety of possible outcomes (several of which would have seen Mike Bateson remaining at the club beyond 2007). Nonetheless, going back to my Disapproval Ratings, I imagine Ian Atkins came in at a relatively low disapproval level (some misgivings of course) and that his score would have scraped the absolute bottom of the disapproval index by May 2006. 2006/2007 dawned optimistically but what thereafter? My memory is of Ian Atkins retaining the faith and sympathy of supporters until his departure but how, in the background (leaving aside what was happening to the club), there were indications that his (so-called) “results football” may not have been to everybody’s liking. Consequently, unless we'd been steaming ahead at the top of the table, my conjecture is that his Mounting Disapproval Rating could have risen more sharply than any Atkins "fluffy" may otherwise contend (Ian Atkins fluffy?) Funnily enough - on balance - I've always reckoned that, had things worked out differently (Bateson staying - and providing reasonable backing - or selling to decent purchasers happy to work with Atkins), 2006/2007 may have turned out similarly to the season we are now experiencing: bright start; play-offs a frequent possibility; (hopefully) no threat of relegation. Then what for 2007/08? A good base for Atkins or a McFarland-like parting of the ways? Bateson staying or going? It’s worth a debate because you can't help wondering.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Jan 5, 2011 15:45:18 GMT
Football fans certainly do like “pedigree” and “glamour” Nick and it does not matter how big or small the club they support is. I would bet Manchester United fans would feel they have bragging rights, when their club signs a world super star player. But then such big clubs are expected to sign those big name players and that’s why I think when a club our size, lands a big name, it really does make our club seem so much bigger and important than it really is.
You tell people Neville Southall played in goal for us, Bruce Rioch was once our player manager, Chris Waddle, Colin Lee etc all played for us and I’ll tell you what, some will think you were pulling their leg. I used to always wonder why they were at such a small seaside town, what was the attraction? Why Torquay and not some better known and bigger club in the lower leagues. Not sure I ever came up with that many answers, but then maybe I was more content just using their names to have bragging rights where my own club I supported was concerned.
My own personal working experience has always led me to believe, the best managers in any field, are the ones who came up from the bottom. They are the ones who learn the job at all levels and as a result has a far better understanding of the workforce.
I have been in jobs were college types were brought in and I had to on occasions take them out with me say on a milk round, to see what the job was all about at my end of the company. I have more than often felt, they are the worst sort to have as managers, why? simply because they don’t have that real knowledge that someone who worked his way up would have.
I lost count over the years how many new directives were sent down by some new manager who was brought in from the outside that was total madness and would not work. So many times it was clear to see what was lacking in the decision making, was that vital undertanding of the job itself and what it really entailed.
It therefore goes without saying, I believe all football managers should come from those who have been in the game at all levels, IE as a player and then maybe moving up to an assistant manager, before taking the next step up.
I suppose it could be argued that any person who was good at man management could be taught the game of football on a blackboard. The objects of the game, the rules, formations and tactics could all be leaned in a classroom, but without that real experience of playing the game etc, could such a person really be that successful?
The real question has to be what makes a good manager and there lies a real problem. Simply because not only in fans eyes but also clubs themselves, one day the manager could be the best there is( based on size of club and what could be afforded) and the next he is no longer good enough to remain as the manager and gets sacked.
For me it has to be someone who knows the game inside out, knows how to prepare his team so that even if the team were complete underdogs, they still could get something out of the game. Good contacts are essential to bring in the right players along with knowing how to get the best out of the chosen players.
Man management skills are also at the top of my list and that is something many would be managers seem to lack. There will always be difficult players to deal with and for use of a better word, control, but keeping the dressing room happy and everyone playing for him the manager, has to be something my manager has to be able to do. Putting personalities to one side for the good of the club is something else my manager would need to display, but we know many managers are unable to do that and the reason players sometimes leave clubs.
Being honest with the fans is also very important and not looking to make excuses for a poor performance or a game that was lost. If a manager wants respect from the fans, its no good him saying we were robbed, or where the better team just after we were played off the park and hardly got a kick of the ball.
Going back To Norman Medhurst, I never really looked how the England set up was at the time, for me it was just watching an England game on the TV and seeing a shot of him and thinking, that’s our man on the TV.
|
|
|
Post by aussie on Jan 5, 2011 19:22:42 GMT
This needs to go into the History room because of the detailed information in it needs to be in it`s correct place but as long as it`s alive and well here then there`s no need to move it yet!
|
|
|
Post by ohtobeatplainmoor on Jan 5, 2011 20:22:59 GMT
Quality mid-week reading!
I would say Cyril was the first Manager that I can say that was in charge when I was a regular - the others I was too young to judge either way. I would say that I agree with all of Hector's observations (although perhaps might not have been quite as critical of Cornforth - I'd be interested to know his win to games ratio compared to Leroy that season and Colin Lee and Neil Warnock in their firefighting roles - maybe we would be surprised?).
I've always had at least a little sympathy for the managers that have given 100% - and the only two that game-off the impression that wasn't the case was Eddie May and Leroy after he moved from Kennford and back to Bristol and didn't work full time for our club.
The only manager who we could say offered us nothing but total improvement and "success" was Kevin Hodges IMO. He saw the writing on the wall and went at the right time - even though the destination of his departure really hurt! Perhaps the failings of a manager was not knowing when to move-on - Don O' surely could have managed at a higher level, perhaps my second favorite manager only to Cyril. Sadly his name was tarnished, perhaps by the loss of several players and having to work with a restricted budget - I'm sure that he would have brought the club on if he had the resources that May used to sign Alex Watson and Paul Baker for a total of £70k in transfer fees alone (and no small signing-on fee in the case of Baker!).
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Jan 5, 2011 21:47:26 GMT
And Ian Atkins too? Not that we'll ever know. One of the "Big Ifs" of recent years I guess. Had the events of May/June 2007 turned out less-fortunately I’m sure that, in time, Atkins may have been seen (rightly or wrongly) as the man who could have stayed to perform miracles. Furthermore, I sense Atkins may have been the preferred option of some who are less well-disposed to Paul Buckle, partly because he appears to be PB’s antithesis (which, I think, begs questions: what was Atkins like at Buckle’s age? What will Buckle be like when he’s Atkins’ age? Similar or dissimilar?) Of course it’s impossible to answer the “what if Atkins had stayed?” question. I suspect that, as with any other manager, there would have been the usual variety of possible outcomes (several of which would have seen Mike Bateson remaining at the club beyond 2007). Nonetheless, going back to my Disapproval Ratings, I imagine Ian Atkins came in at a relatively low disapproval level (some misgivings of course) and that his score would have scraped the absolute bottom of the disapproval index by May 2006. 2006/2007 dawned optimistically but what thereafter? Using your disapproval ratings Nick, I would suggest Atkins would have scored very low indeed. The problem the fans had at the time was Bateson brought in a man who he phoned to offer the managers job and at the time that man was just out walking his dog. Could Cornforth have kept Torquay United in the league? It’s a question we will never know the answer too, but Bateson sure did not want the club losing its league status under his ownership and feeling very desperate, was not going to take the chance he might just not do that. As always Bateson left things to the very last minute before taking any action and as always he just got away with it by the skin on his teeth. I’m not sure Ian Akins would have kept his low disapproval ratings very long if he been the manager for a longer period than he was. Simply because is style of football was boring and while effective enough to keep us up, not something fans would have wanted to keep paying to watch. Would we have stayed up and not lost our league status if he not been replaced by Luboš Kubík? Once again a question we will never know the answer too I’m afraid. Why did Roberts want Atkins out of the way anyway? Well the main reason was he believed Luboš Kubík would be able to provide all the cheap players from his country that Roberts in time wanted to fill the side with. Many TUFC fans seemed happy with this idea, but was it really anything to do with us having a better side? A side full of quality players from another country that would take the club to new heights? I never bought into any of that and I’ll tell you why. Roberts always knew he had to keep the club running until he got his stadium come hotel and shopping complex built. He also knew he had to keep control of the club and ownership as well, as the club was the vehicle he needed to get his hands on the Rec site. But he had one real big problem he knew he had to address, yes those monthly £10.000 payments to Mike Bateson. Failure to keep them up and he would have defaulted on the agreement with Mike Bateson who would have then kept everything that had been paid so far and Roberts would have had to walk away with nothing. But the man was penniless himself and had to take the money to pay Bateson from the club itself, something not sustainable on the money coming into the club. I firmly believe his plan was to bring in these cheap players, get rid of all the players who were here earning a half decent wage, so he would then not put the clubs fiances under such a strain making the payments to Bateson. Well that’s how I saw it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 5, 2011 22:24:53 GMT
I doubt that even John Cornforth's granny would have greeted his appointment with any enthusiasm: "Sort it out bonny lad, yer useless wee git!"
As soon as it was suggested, I thought Roberts' idea of importing cheap Czech players was at least ten years out of date. I'm sure we couldn't have afforded decent prospects and would have ended up with an unsellable ragbag of players. I bet poor old Lubos had been led to believe there was a pot of gold available to sign up most of the Czech Under 21 squad. He must have realised pretty quickly that it was all bollocks.
|
|