|
Post by chrish on Jul 5, 2010 6:46:34 GMT
I know it's accepted in plenty of countries, but it is the most un British aspect of continental football I can think of. The day watching Torquay means seeing us provide training opposition and facilities for the also-rans of Premiership teams is the day I’ll hang up my scarf. I’d sooner watch us play Accrington 46 times a season than see us suffer the indignity of hosting Liverpool Reserves in a League fixture. Are you Howard Wilkinson in disguise?
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Jul 5, 2010 7:31:45 GMT
Not to my knowledge. Are you Tim Lovejoy in disguise?
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Jul 5, 2010 8:28:00 GMT
Lambeth's right in my opinion, take St Pauli as an example....................a couple of seasons ago they were playing in the same league as their city rivals SV Hamburg; just as they are now only the difference then was they were playing SV's reserves. Not only that, the last time they played SV in a Bundesliga 1 game at "home", home had to be away at SV's AOL Arena because the local authorities said that to play at The Millentor with it's 20,000 capacity was unfair on all the SV fans who wouldn't be able to get in. Now imagine all that tosh and apply it to us and Argyle ~ there was enough lasting damage to Torquay United's standing in many people's eyes when Bateson gave the Popside to Trelooney's Army, let alone us being forced to play home AND away at Gnome Park! Now imagine an away game at "Liverpool Reserves", where would that be played? You can bet your bottom dollar it wouldn't be at Anfield but more than likely shoved to some "out ground" like Southport..................it would just kill lower league football in my opinion, yet this is what Rafa Benitez and Arsene Wenger have been lobbying for over some years. Better that the growing number of Championship and larger League 1 clubs who have ditched formal reserve football get themselves back on board and start providing a meaningfull stepping stone for their emerging professionals.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2010 10:57:32 GMT
Now imagine an away game at "Liverpool Reserves", where would that be played? You can bet your bottom dollar it wouldn't be at Anfield but more than likely shoved to some "out ground" like Southport.. Liverpool Reserves have been known to play their home matches in another country....at Wrexham.
|
|
|
Post by chrish on Jul 5, 2010 12:15:55 GMT
Lambeth's right in my opinion, take St Pauli as an example....................a couple of seasons ago they were playing in the same league as their city rivals SV Hamburg; just as they are now only the difference then was they were playing SV's reserves. Not only that, the last time they played SV in a Bundesliga 1 game at "home", home had to be away at SV's AOL Arena because the local authorities said that to play at The Millentor with it's 20,000 capacity was unfair on all the SV fans who wouldn't be able to get in. Now imagine all that tosh and apply it to us and Argyle ~ there was enough lasting damage to Torquay United's standing in many people's eyes when Bateson gave the Popside to Trelooney's Army, let alone us being forced to play home AND away at Gnome Park! Now imagine an away game at "Liverpool Reserves", where would that be played? You can bet your bottom dollar it wouldn't be at Anfield but more than likely shoved to some "out ground" like Southport..................it would just kill lower league football in my opinion, yet this is what Rafa Benitez and Arsene Wenger have been lobbying for over some years. Better that the growing number of Championship and larger League 1 clubs who have ditched formal reserve football get themselves back on board and start providing a meaningfull stepping stone for their emerging professionals. I'm not so sure that it will kill the lower leagues off. I think that will happen by itself over the next 10-15 years anyway. As long as Football continues to mirror society's ever increasing gap between the rich and the poor then we'll see more and more clubs get themselves into huge amounts of debt. I do fear for our own existance without Mr Bristow's fantastic contributions. Although I think that the German system would help the development of younger players I'm not sure how it would help out the lower traditional clubs financially apart from possibly just replacing clubs in financial trouble with Big club's reserve teams. I personally don't have an issue with us playing "Aston Villa A" as opposed to Stockport County. To me the major thing is trying strike a balance between creating a environment for Premier League clubs to blood their young players in a much more competitive environment and making sure that we don't mess around too much with the traditional lower league setup. Perhaps if the stigma of playing Liverpool A/Liverpool Reserves then the other option would be for the bigger clubs to create partnerships and subsidise the operations of smaller clubs and contribute young players but keep the identity of the smaller partner club. Manchester Utd do this with Royal Antwerp. Arsenal do this with Beveren. The problem here is getting into bed with the right partner club. You can't argue that having 4 or 5 loan players from another club at any one time is going to devalue lower division clubs. At one point last year we had several loanees making up a fair proportion of the first team squad. Does it really matter that future loanees could come from the same bigger team? The cost savings could be quite significant and might keep clubs alive.
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Jul 5, 2010 13:35:01 GMT
I'm not so sure that it will kill the lower leagues off. I think that will happen by itself over the next 10-15 years anyway.................
Although I think that the German system would help the development of younger players.................
To me the major thing is trying strike a balance between creating a environment for Premier League clubs to blood their young players in a much more competitive environment and making sure that we don't mess around too much with the traditional lower league setup....................
At one point last year we had several loanees making up a fair proportion of the first team squad. Does it really matter that future loanees could come from the same bigger team? Some very good points there which I will endeavour to respond to whilst having one eye on Le Tour on Eurosport * and having a window on the PC open with the official tour live progress ~ have you ever used that with it's little figures chopping and changing positions? The "death" of the lower leagues has been the subject of speculation for many, many years; somehow and some way it is still not with us and the influx of considerable sums of money now from the overseas rights to TV coverage of the Premiership, which although ring fenced for youth development; is the latest and a very substantial safety net for the clubs below the Premiership itself that is helping keep that spectrum from haunting football. Therefore I think it is becoming apparent that the Premiership clubs are already regarding their smaller bretheren as the "growing fields" in which their burgeoning stars of the future as the nurseries in which they can place them so that instead of the German system where those types actually play for their own club's reserves; in this country they play for the incumbent clubs at those levels instead of against them. So we see a situation where a club like QPR have players in on loan from clubs like Arsenal and play them in their first team, yet in turn loan out their own young pro's to clubs such as ourselves as they don't in fact now operate in a formal reserve team competition.................a "cascading" down of talent if you like. This in turn saves the League 2 and Conference clubs who are the beneficiaries lower down on their own wage bill and development costs. I would much prefer OUR club to have a formal "development agreement" with a substantially larger club and include their players within our squad whilst the make up of the league we play in retains it's current status, rather than seeing some our independent rivals replaced by the formal reserves of Premiership and larger Championship/League 1 clubs. At one time last season Tottenham and Arsenal between them had a total of over forty young pro's out on loan to smaller clubs (Arsenal even lending one or two to rival Premiership clubs) so I don't really see a problem with them consolidating those arrangements so that they loan "pockets" of four or five youngsters to smaller clubs rather than dot them all over the country. I think in reality that is the road that Paul Buckle has been working along with Tottenham in particular and using his relationship with Alex Inglethorpe whilst at the same time changing our own style of play so that the players comng in from such a sophisticated club are not thrown into some "route one" side who's football bears no relation whatsoever to that which they have been patiently coached and developed in at their parent clubs. I don't think Harry Redknapp wants his potential stars of the future developing bad habits that could manifest itself into suddenly lacking the composure to retain possession for long periods of the game as they will be required to use when they play in the Premiership and hopefully international football for their country. That more than anything else will enhance and improve the standard of football played in the lower leagues, and we know ourselves just how the football required to be successfull in League 2 is entirely different to that required in the BSP. * By the way, the Tour progresses from Brussels to Spa today through the Northern areas of the Ardennes where I have enjoyed some wonderful cycling/canoing/camping holidays in an area very similar to the Teign Valley. They will climb the famous cobbled Stockeu Wall at Stavelot shortly and no doubt piss up there at such a rate as to ridicule the near heart attack I suffered when manfully struggling up the bastard several years ago! It's not the steep hills that do for you, it's all the ruddy breweries and local beers on offer every night that ruin your fitness!
|
|
Rags
TFF member
Posts: 1,210
|
Post by Rags on Jul 5, 2010 14:02:18 GMT
Some very good points there which I will endeavour to respond to whilst having one eye on Le Tour on Eurosport * and having a window on the PC open with the official tour live progress ~ have you ever used that with it's little figures chopping and changing positions? I can't or it would spoil ITV4's highlights prog for me. I know you get to experience more of the cut and thrust of the race watching live but I'm afraid I am addicted to the Liggett/Sherwin commentary...
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Jul 5, 2010 14:16:26 GMT
I'm watching the Tour climb the hill out of Trois Ponts and it's tarmacked! too bloody soft these modern day riders............ in the days of Eddie Merckx that was cobbled ~ I suppose they've done that to stop the locals digging them up and lobbing 'em at the Frenchies in the peleton.
|
|
|
Post by chrish on Jul 5, 2010 19:36:11 GMT
Some very good points there which I will endeavour to respond to whilst having one eye on Le Tour on Eurosport * and having a window on the PC open with the official tour live progress ~ have you ever used that with it's little figures chopping and changing positions? I can't or it would spoil ITV4's highlights prog for me. I know you get to experience more of the cut and thrust of the race watching live but I'm afraid I am addicted to the Liggett/Sherwin commentary... If it hadn't've been for the Tour de France with the Liggett/Sherwin commentary I would never have learned French or travelled around France quite so much as I have. Make sure you tune in for stage 12 from Bourg-du-Peage to Mende. It's classed as a hilly stage and goes through the centre of france from Drôme to Lozere. Very pretty countyside. Talking the great Eddy Merkycx. They've decided to make Stage 16 from Bagneres-du-Luchon to Pau a tribute to his 1969 victory. They've got 5 of the "Cols" that day starting with the Col du Peyresourde at 1569 metres, then onto the Col d'Aspin at 1490 metres, then the biggie Le Col du Tourmalet at 2115 metres down to Luz St Sauveur where I stayed last year up to Argeles Gazost and then on a very scenic road (the D418) towards Aucun and then another climb up to the Col du Soulor (1474 metres) where I saw Bearded Vultures with 3 metre wingspans and a local using a battered Fiat Panda and a small halfords type trailer to lug a cow up the hill. The cow decided sit down after 4 corners! From that hill it's another 300 metres further up to the Col d'Aubisque at 1709 metres and then it's a long a fast descent on the Route des Fromages (named after the local Issau-Oraty cheese) to the very nice town of Pau. Then guess what they have to do the next day? A different route up from Pau to the Col du Soulor with a 25 km climb and then back down to towards Luz St Sauveur and a finish at the top of the Col du Tourmalet at the statue of Octave Lapize who in 1910 screamed at Race Officials as he struggled to finish the stage and shouted "Vous êtes des assassins! Oui, des assassins!" (You are murderers, yes murderers). The bloke was eventually shot down in the First World War
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Jul 5, 2010 20:56:45 GMT
I just fail to see how the introduction of reserve teams into the Football League structure could work. Who is going to be asked to leave to accommodate them? And who is to say which top-flight club (presumably one who could afford to operate what would be in effect two professional outfits) would be able to enter a second team? What would happen in the FA and League cup? Would reserve teams sit out? How would Conference teams or teams currently below the current tier 4 get a look in? As for the proposed 'bar' on reserve sides going beyond say, League 1 – how would that work?
No, our football pyramid; it’s structure, its ethos, its history is worth more than anything – more than the fortunes of the England team, more than any 'genius' at the FA or Football League or who would think of dismantling it...and certainly more than people like Wenger and Benitez and their employers whose only interest is their own.
|
|
|
Post by chrish on Jul 5, 2010 22:44:15 GMT
"I believe that all reserve teams in Germany can play in the Pokal Cup"
I found out since the Hertha Berlin A actually reached the 1993 DFB Pokal Final where they lost only 1-0 to Bayer Leverkusen. The winning goal was scored by German Internation Ulf Kirsten. The Hertha Berlin A side that day included future German International Carsten Ramelow who then was signed by Leverkusen 3 years later.
Their record won't be equalled though as now reserve teams can't compete anymore in the Pokal Cup.
|
|
keyberrygull
TFF member
Posts: 994
Favourite Player: Steve Cooper
|
Post by keyberrygull on Jul 6, 2010 6:38:36 GMT
With the European under-19 championship in France less than a week away and top flight clubs refusing to release English players being deemed acceptable! I rest my case. Pre season tours and being close to the start of the domestic season were some of the lame excuses given by the clubs.
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Jul 6, 2010 7:27:55 GMT
Well Harry Redknapp has overruled the youth management at his club and insisted that the four Spurs youngsters will now travel with England. Arsenal too, have fully co-operated but Arsene Wenger once again has pointed out his view of the "stupidity" of holding this tournament right in the middle of the pre-season build up; but as Sir Trevor Brooking has pointed out ~ it's only THIS country that begins it's season so early, necessitating our pre-season prepararations taking place during the whole of July; and that really there is no other available slot in the calender for this important tournament. I spent last evening at a League 1 club's training ground, having a look round as Anthony has been invited to "pre-season" there having been recommended to them by a few different scouts who have seen him over the past few months. The under 8s and under 9s were being assessed and selected for their squads for this coming season, and the under 10s, which he would join if he goes; were on their first night back being weighed and monitored for speed and running technique. I'm not sure if he'll be going there just yet, as there are a couple of other avenues to explore this week before we make a decision. One of the people who spoke to me last night is a famous athlete who represented this country in the Olympic Games and World Championships and he works as a running coach for several professional football and rugby clubs , and he was there assessing all the trialists for their running technique and mechanics. He told me he can get a rough idea just from a first look which boys have a realistic chance of surviving ten or more years as a regularly trained footballer and which ones who's poor technique will bring on recurring injury. He can also guess roughly what growth potential they have, and that is a huge factor in deciding whether clubs even take them on or not......................we all know how Danny Stevens and Eunane O'Kane have suffered due to their lack of physical development; and I could tell you of a load of players I have noticed at Torquay over the years who just cannot run properly. In fact he said that footballers are amongst the very worst of sportsmen for having self damaging running technique. He's going to assess Anthony more specifically during training tonight for me, but already knows him having watched him train for the past two months now and is impressed with his immense stamina and ability to maintain maximum pace over the whole of most games........................that's a start then and he starts on "trapping those bags of cement" next week (that IS a joke by the way ) There's a lot more goes into selecting future professionals than meets the eye and this goes someway to explaining all those "I could have beens" who we all know in local football.
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Jul 6, 2010 21:42:58 GMT
I believe that all reserve teams in Germany can play in the Pokal Cup but in Spain these teams cannot play in the Copa del Rey. They are fully fledged clubs in their own right. In Spain these clubs cannot be promoted any higher than the Second Division and in Germany I think the highest they can go is the 3. Liga (Third national division). Maybe you're right Lambeth. Maybe it's a case that without knowing it that we place more emphasis on our own football traditions and it's more important that our system and traditions support 92 Professional clubs first rather than place the emphasis on the National side. But it's not to say that reserve teams abroad have no tradition at all though. Barcelona B for example started life as the Societat Esportiva Industrial Espanya who were a factory team of a company owned by the then FC Barcelona president. They then became Barcelona's reserve team and progress through the leagues until they got promotion to the first division but they weren't allowed to play in the same division as Barcelona. So they made themselves independant of Barcelona and became Club Deportivo Condal and got promotion to the first division in 1956. They got relegated after one season and then came back under the FC Barcelona wing in 1968. In 1970 the Barca president merged CD Condal and another side to form Barcelona Atletic and then in 1990 they were renamed again to Barcelona B. In 2008 Joan Laporta renamed them back to Barcelona Atletic and they are known as Barcelona B again. The point I'm trying to make is this. I think that you'll find that supporters in both Germany and Spain are equally proud of their footballing traditions and I don't think that either of the countries places more emphasis on either their club football or the national team but there is far more emphasis on developing teams with homegrown players. Barcelona like to develop their own players and instill in them from any early age what's expected from them. Real Madrid are slightly different. They produce a huge amount of players. The best make it into their first team while the rest usually find another club and then go for a lot of money in future years! It's worth noting them Real Madrid have sold two players from their B team recently for a combined total of 4 million Euros. Alberto Bueno got sold to Real Valladolid for 3 million and German defender Christopher Schorch was sold to 1 FC Koln for 1 million after a succesfull 17 game loan spell in Cologne. He'd also played for Hertha Berlin A and Hertha Berlin before moving to Spain for 2 years. He's still only 21. This is my main worry with the development of players in this country. They look full of promise up until 17 or 18 and then seem to get lost in a void. They then get released and then have to rebuild their careers again. The Germans and the Spanish players seem to make the transition easier at the moment. That's a really interesting post, Chris. I hope my comments weren't seen to be claiming any supposed supremacy for English football or culture; each country has its own history, geography and antecedents, and what exists in one country should and cannot be seen as a 'blueprint' for others to follow. But our pyramid structure is surely something very special indeed. The fact that there is nothing (in theory) to stop a club rising from the depths of non-league to achieve Football League status, FA Cup glory and more through nothing more than winning games is little short of fantastic in my book. We are, to my knowledge, the only country of equivalent size that hosts 5 national leagues, and that to me is precious. The relatively short distances involved - for most! ;D (compared to say, Spain, Germany or even Italy) - no doubt makes this possible. But so does our footballing culture, which when you look below the Premiership and its legions of overbearing 'fans', means that loyalty to one's club, it's history, its place and the pride/despair felt at its position in the overall scheme of things - however 'minor' or temporary - is what makes supporting an 'unfashionable' club worth the effort. You were right (as i saw it) to infer from my post that I believe this has certain negative effects. Clubs do over-reach themselves, short-term gain caused by the lure of promotion - even at lowest of levels - can and does lead to short-sightedness and catastrophic failure. It can also lead, imo, to a 'win at all costs' mentality which one could argue is not always conducive to the production of an aesthetic spectacle, the health of the national team or coaching. But that is a price worth paying imo. To be a fan of a club of Torquay's size is not to support a club 'three leagues below the Premiership' (as i always have to explain to foreigners! : , but a club that has played the likes of Sheffield Wednesday, Bradford City, Middlesborough, Crystal Palace and others on its own terms in the League and countless others in the Cup. It's to support a team that is a 3/4/5 tier club in a 20+ tier system...and it's what thousands of clubs up and down the country aspire one day to be. That to me is what the likes of Arsene Wenger and Rafa Benitez fail to appreciate or acknowledge when they come out with their myopic 'reserve teams should play in the Championship' nonsense, and that is why every right-minded fan, should dismiss such ideas out of hand.
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Jul 7, 2010 0:17:06 GMT
England's national leagues are well supported. Only Germany compares: ( www.european-football-statistics.co.uk/attn.htm) England (league average) – highest average Level 1 (34,151) -74,864 (Manchester United) Level 2 (17,984) -43,388 (Newcastle United) Level 3 (9,144) -24,818 (Leeds United) Level 4 (3,855) – 11,423 (Bradford City) Level 5 (2,028) -6,931 (Luton Town) GermanyLevel 1 (42,500) – 77,248 (Borussia Dortmund) Level 2 (15,009) –35,398 FC Kaiserslautern Level 3 (5,110) -14,397 (SG Dynamo Dresden) Level 4* (1,364) –5,955 (Rot-Weiss Essen)SpainLevel 1 (28,286) –78,097 (FC Barcelona) Level 2 (9,089) -28,730 (Real Betis) ItalyLevel 1 (24,957) – 56,195 (Inter Milan) Level 2 (5,430) – 13,584 (Torino FC 1906) Level 3* (2,643) – 14,331 (Hellas Verona FC)* Regional league average
|
|