rjdgull
TFF member
Admin
Posts: 12,224
|
Post by rjdgull on Jan 12, 2013 0:51:42 GMT
I would just like to echo my support for the return of Wildebeest! As for politics, stay clear if you don't want an argument but the TFFSC can more than hold its own on here although it will be a poorer association without "Felix" and indeed Barts. Anyway, football back on today, a topic that we are all a bit more united on...
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Jan 12, 2013 7:58:50 GMT
Wildebeest you should not feel bad about starting this thread, a thread that has got to ten pages with over 90 posts on it. Such threads so often do get a bit heated and the wrong things said on them, that is just the nature of forums sometimes. I have always felt as adults we should be able to discuss most things on here, but then there are times I say the wrong things, or simply fail to get across what I mean. Stefano summed up where I was really coming from in a few lines, maybe I should try to do it that way in future.
There was a time on here when it seemed we forgot we were a football forum first and foremost, I said at the time I was thinking about reducing the boards and have just football ones only. But so many on here did not want that to happen and one of the things that did make the TFF different was you could be reading about old railway stations one day and our latest signing the next day.
Have you really been with us since June? how time flies and as far as the TFF members are concerned, you were a breath of fresh air on here when you joined and like Nick, have added so much interesting content on the TFF. Please keep adding to the TFF what you have been doing since you joined, the forum needs members like you and Nick, Jon, Timbo and if we all ended up as just readers, we would soon run out of things to read.
We loath locking threads on here and so we won't be doing that, once the final post gets made on this thread, it will in time slip off the first page and be resigned to history.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2013 8:05:42 GMT
Aw, shucks, guys! You have made me feel all warm inside, which is just as well because it's going to be a hat, scarf and gloves occasion at Burton today.
After "If that ain't Blindwylle Road my name ain't Wildebeeste" turned out to be somewhere else I thought it only honourable to change, but if you prefer the original then the Wildebeeste returns!
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Jan 12, 2013 10:06:01 GMT
PS: Sorry Lambie! No problem at all, Serg. The day that coppers and those of a unionist persuasion start to agree with me is the day I reassess my ideas
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Jan 12, 2013 10:08:50 GMT
Can I make an observation about the past few days, Dave?
I realise you're the site's founder, but it isn't credible for you to claim to be "an ordinary poster who does just post his views" if you're going to arbitrarily shut the site down for a period or restrict access to it whenever someone posts something you really don't like.
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Jan 12, 2013 10:32:55 GMT
Make all the observations you want Lambie, but try not to jump to the wrong concussions. I was up very late On Wednesday night adding a load of new codes ready for when I change the forum software over at the end of the month. I have to use it from April and would rather use it as soon as possible so any problems can be sorted out. The new codes screwed the forum up and when I went to remove them I removed parts of other codes as well. I had to give up as I needed to be up at 5am for work. I had to go out on Thursday night and got up at 3am to remove all the codes that have been added to the TFF and put back in the most important ones.. This took until 5am to complete. This morning I have put back in the remaining codes. Rob was fully aware of the problems.
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Jan 12, 2013 10:44:52 GMT
Fair dos, Dave. Thanks for the explanation. Not the first time access restrictions have been introduced though is it?
|
|
Dave
TFF member
Posts: 13,081
|
Post by Dave on Jan 12, 2013 10:49:45 GMT
Fair dos, Dave. Thanks for the explanation. Not the first time access restrictions have been introduced though is it? very true Lambie but as I said that was not the case this time. Right click the forum and select view source and you will see all the added codes and while I'm not too bad at working with them, I'm no computer expert. I will at the end of the month just switch over the new software and clear out all the codes and just add them back one by one.
|
|
|
Post by stefano on Jan 12, 2013 11:24:33 GMT
PS: Sorry Lambie! No problem at all, Serg. The day that coppers and those of a unionist persuasion start to agree with me is the day I reassess my ideas ;D I do like the 'sarge' bit and am completely happy with it as long as you don't tell the pension department! There have been times when I have wanted to agree with you but didn't really have a clue what you were saying
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Jan 12, 2013 12:16:30 GMT
No problem at all, Serg. The day that coppers and those of a unionist persuasion start to agree with me is the day I reassess my ideas ;D I do like the 'sarge' bit and am completely happy with it as long as you don't tell the pension department! There have been times when I have wanted to agree with you but didn't really have a clue what you were saying Action precedes understanding, so it's probably a little late unfortunately. But you only have to ask to you know
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2013 13:29:24 GMT
Possible case of Police brutality there I would imagine. I hope Stefano hasn't been treating Lambeth as the Blair Peach of the TFF.
Stefano
Put that sort of silly idea out of your mind Stefano. We should stick with our tried and trusted methods of getting our retaliation in first. Lambeth expects nothing less than a full blooded two footed challenge in response to his posts.
The downside of our role as 'first responders' is when we re-read Lambeth or Wildebeeste's posts and realise they've actually made a reasonable point, but letting them know that isn't going to help the debate along.
And remember when we really do find ourselves losing the argument we can always call in reinforcements from Thailand.
I'll raise a glass mug of Fairtrade coffee to plenty more lively debate with our socialist friends throughout the coming year.
|
|
davethegull
TFF member
Posts: 1,094
Favourite Player: Dave Caldwell
|
Post by davethegull on Jan 14, 2013 12:55:41 GMT
Don't know who wrote this, but it is a simple explanation of why Socialism doesn't work and never will, not even in Lambies lalaland. He's still yet to come up with a single Socialist State that has been successful. Of course he can't because there isn't one.
CLASSROOM SOCIALISM
Is this man truly a genius? An economics professor at a local college made a statement that he had never failed a single student before b...ut had recently failed an entire class. That class had insisted that Obama's socialism worked and that no one would be poor and no one would be rich, a great equalizer.
The professor then said, "OK, we will have an experiment in this class on Obama's plan". All grades will be averaged and everyone will receive the same grade so no one will fail and no one will receive an “A”.... (substituting grades for dollars - something closer to home and more readily understood by all).
After the first test, the grades were averaged and everyone got a “B”. The students who studied hard were upset and the students who studied little were happy.
As the second test rolled around, the students who studied little had studied even less and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted a free ride too so they studied little. The second test average was a “D”! No one was happy.
When the 3rd test rolled around, the new average was an “F”.
As the tests proceeded, the scores never increased as bickering, blame and name-calling all resulted in hard feelings and no one would study for the benefit of anyone else.
To their great surprise, ALL FAILED and the professor told them that socialism would also ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try or want to succeed.
Human nature will always cause socialism's style of government to fail because the world has producers and non-producers (makers and takers).
It could not be any simpler than that.
These are possibly the 5 best sentences you'll ever read and all applicable to this experiment:
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it!
5. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that is the beginning of the end of any nation.
|
|
|
Post by lambethgull on Jan 14, 2013 13:24:11 GMT
The fact that you consider Obama to be a socialist shows how little you know about either socialism or Obama.
You ask about socialist states, but I don't consider the state to be socialist. All that state capitalist societies such as 'communist' Russia did was create one exploiter - the state - instead of thousands of exploiters (capitalists). How is that socialist? If you knew anything about the Russian Revolution or Russia (which you don't, because you're an ignoramus), you'd know that Lenin destroyed the Soviets - workers councils - to consolidate the Party's total control of the state. Read about the left wing opponents of the Bolsheviks - Kronstadt would be a good starting point - and learn how ludicrously blinkered and uneducated your conception and understanding of socialism or the state is.
'Capitalist' states have been around 400 years old. For the vast majority of human history - 100,000+ years - human societies have been organised differently. Yet even in so-called capitalist states, worker's gains: healthcare, the 8 hour day, the weekend, paid annual leave, universal suffrage etc have always been achieved by worker's struggle, not as a gift from the state or kindly capitalists.
As the anarcho-syndicalist Rudolf Rocker said:
"Political rights do not originate in parliaments; they are, rather, forced upon parliaments from without. And even their enactment into law has for a long time been no guarantee of their security. Just as the employers always try to nullify every concession they had made to labor as soon as opportunity offered, as soon as any signs of weakness were observable in the workers' organizations, so governments also are always inclined to restrict or to abrogate completely rights and freedoms that have been achieved if they imagine that the people will put up no resistance. Even in those countries where such things as freedom of the press, right of assembly, right of combination, and the like have long existed, governments are constantly trying to restrict those rights or to reinterpret them by juridical hair-splitting. Political rights do not exist because they have been legally set down on a piece of paper, but only when they have become the ingrown habit of a people, and when any attempt to impair them will meet with the violent resistance of the populace . Where this is not the case, there is no help in any parliamentary Opposition or any Platonic appeals to the constitution.
|
|
davethegull
TFF member
Posts: 1,094
Favourite Player: Dave Caldwell
|
Post by davethegull on Jan 14, 2013 16:15:52 GMT
Whoa lambie, you're way over thinking stuff again. It doesn't work lambie, never has. Your idealistic Utopian society cannot exist it goes against human nature and the animal spirits. The "worthy" cause you seek always gets hijacked by psycopaths and criminals who proceed to commit mass murder. Anyway, just for you
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2013 17:50:22 GMT
Some interesting points made by Lambeth and Rudolf, and when I have more time I fully intend learning a bit more about the Kronstadt Sailors, as well as reading wildebeeste's book I'm sure davethegull can agree there's some truth in this. Does anyone doubt that Obama wouldn't have all the guns taken off the American populace tomorrow if he thought he could get away with it ? It's only the realisation of the scale of resistance to such a measure that prevents him, and insures he will work towards that goal more slowly. Staying topical, our Government, the Eire Government and the Belfast local authority would much rather have the Union Jack chucked in the waste bin for good rather than agreeing to allow it still to be raised on 'certain days'. But if we apply Rocker's writings we'll remember that it's become an ingrown habit of generations to see the Union Flag flying over Belfast City Hall and so a scale of resistance has naturally been encountered when a substantial portion of the populace see that 'right' being withdrawn. I wouldn't deny that 'workers struggle' has brought about some changes but wonder whether short term gain won't result in long term pain given the realities of the modern world. Take the French with their 35 hour week and their 75% top rate of income tax. Yes a cushy time knocking off early for a few years, and a good dollop of other peoples money to spend for a while as well, but what of 10 years down the line ? The industrious Chinese will have a fine lifestyle based on their hard work as their productive industries bear further fruit, whereas the French could be crying into their Fairtrade coffee as they observe they are all equally poor and living on onion soup. Life is certainly a good deal better for the working class, but Lambeth mistakenly attributes that to 'the workers struggle' whereas more accurately he should be crediting the wonders of capitalism Only by the magnificent advances made by the Great Capitalists, naturally inspired by the profit motive, was our society able to improve so rapidly to the benefit of all. Whereas it may have taken a couple of days to make one chair in days gone by, capitalist production systems encouraged specialisation and mechanisation so that vast amounts of goods could be manufactured, and one thousand chairs now come off the production line each morning. Tom Woods can explain this far better than me, but it was the benefits of capitalism that hastened the demise of old practices should as shoving kids up chimneys rather than the more romantic notion of 'workers struggle'
|
|