In response to your query Buster, the manager has been here long enough and signed virtually ALL of the squad so he will always be leaving out some of
"his own signings" My personal feeling is that he has made the central defence selections he has through a desire to pass the ball out from defensive situations this season - rather as many of his detractors on various sites would have him done according to their protestations!
So, he has identified certain players he feels can do this over certain players who (perhaps) he feels don't display that potential.
Don't tell me you suddenly expect Steve Woods to find a sudden couple of yards of pace or a degree of passing accuracy that we have never seen before?
Do you prefer he signs the vastly experienced Lee Hodges and then leaves him on the subs' bench in deference to the very raw potential of Mark Ellis?
I have been lambasted on this site and others for posting my understanding of the use of no frills, less risk, pragmatic football with players at this level. Yet when I admit that I understand that the manager is trying to play a more expansive game this season I am accused of "U Turns"
At the end of the day, as long as a manager is obviously putting one hundred per cent of effort one hundred per cent of the time I am happy to let him get on with his job even though I personally may not like his style or agree with his selections.
You've only heard me start shouting about a certain manager when he clearly was
NOT putting in one hundred per cent, was
NOT setting any example of commitment to the players by moving ninety miles away from the club and was
"airey faireying" about on Radio 5 when he could have been out on club business scouting future opponents.