|
Post by davepougher on Mar 31, 2009 20:41:59 GMT
Is just making the play-offs going to be enough for most fans?
I hate it when somebody asks a question then the question is analyzed to point where other questions have to be asked......... and I've just done that!
Of course it should be enough it certainly is enough for me but not for others. When the play off position is achieved the question changes on the refs final whistle to "can we do it" mangers must hate the play offs, there’s little they can change in those three games, other than manage what they have (do their job!) and chairmen love em!
Staff at the club, whoever they are, should have their future decided before the lottery of the play offs not on the outcome of them.
My main concern right now, without prejudice, is obtaining the privilege.
|
|
|
Post by crispygull on Mar 31, 2009 20:52:51 GMT
Staff at the club, whoever they are, should have their future decided before the lottery of the play offs not on the outcome of them. I cannot agree Dave. Whilst in an ideal world all of the players would like to know where they will be next season as far as a contract offer is concerned, it is just not realistic. The fact is, should we be promoted to League Two, our income will vastly increase from TV, sponsorship, on the gate and all the other ancilliaries ... programme sales, bar sales etc etc. Should we remain in the Conference then a totally different set of circumstances will ensue! Not only that, but from the Managers perspective there are probably some players within our squad who the Manager thinks could do a job in the Conference ... but wont cut it in League Two.
|
|
|
Post by stuartB on Mar 31, 2009 21:10:47 GMT
Staff at the club, whoever they are, should have their future decided before the lottery of the play offs not on the outcome of them. I cannot agree Dave. Whilst in an ideal world all of the players would like to know where they will be next season as far as a contract offer is concerned, it is just not realistic. The fact is, should we be promoted to League Two, our income will vastly increase from TV, sponsorship, on the gate and all the other ancilliaries ... programme sales, bar sales etc etc. Should we remain in the Conference then a totally different set of circumstances will ensue! Not only that, but from the Managers perspective there are probably some players within our squad who the Manager thinks could do a job in the Conference ... but wont cut it in League Two. Could this be Turkeys voting for Xmas? If you think that you will not be getting a contract next year if we go up but will if we stay down, will you be playing to your full ability at the moment? Chris Hargreaves for example. I think Chris is a model professional and would not expect anything but the max from him but he would be unlikely to get a contract in L2 but will definitely get a year in the BSP.
|
|
merse
TFF member
Posts: 2,684
|
Post by merse on Apr 2, 2009 19:31:00 GMT
To suggest Paul Buckle will be replaced if we fail is quite ridiculous . On the whole he has done a pretty good job, no matter what some may like to believe and the club have up till nowalways been competetive in this league and dont forget our exccelent cup runs. I can name half a dozen ex league side who would love our "SUCCESS" over the last 20 months. I couldn't agree more Pete, but I'm afraid that we belong to a generation who's acceptance of the reality of expectation is on a lot more realistic level than the evergrowing number of "we want success, and we want it now" merchants who are spoiling the party for me these days. It's the same with the unrealistic demands of younger fans for a certain level of skill and entertainment......................they just don't seem to get it that the manager has so often to work with "flawed" goods when taking on players who have failed to establish themselves at a higher level. That's how it is for clubs of our size and how it always will be, and if people want it to be any different then THEY have to come up with the goods and provide a level of support that in all honesty has never been shown in our club's case with the possible exception of the late sixties and the immediate post war years. Summing up, even in the BSP we struggle to be one of the biggest half dozen clubs; so what right do folk have to be dissatisfied with a "near miss" finish?
|
|
|
Post by weathergull on Apr 2, 2009 19:55:29 GMT
To suggest Paul Buckle will be replaced if we fail is quite ridiculous . On the whole he has done a pretty good job, no matter what some may like to believe and the club have up till nowalways been competetive in this league and dont forget our exccelent cup runs. I can name half a dozen ex league side who would love our "SUCCESS" over the last 20 months. I couldn't agree more Pete, but I'm afraid that we belong to a generation who's acceptance of the reality of expectation is on a lot more realistic level than the evergrowing number of "we want success, and we want it now" merchants who are spoiling the party for me these days. It's the same with the unrealistic demands of younger fans for a certain level of skill and entertainment......................they just don't seem to get it that the manager has so often to work with "flawed" goods when taking on players who have failed to establish themselves at a higher level. That's how it is for clubs of our size and how it always will be, and if people want it to be any different then THEY have to come up with the goods and provide a level of support that in all honesty has never been shown in our club's case with the possible exception of the late sixties and the immediate post war years. Summing up, even in the BSP we struggle to be one of the biggest half dozen clubs; so what right do folk have to be dissatisfied with a "near miss" finish? I'm guessing some of those remarks were aimed at me Merse! "We want success and we want it now" could be said of the majority of the fans of every club in the country. I also note that you ignored my later post, where I stated: I didn't say that the club would get rid of Paul Buckle.I understand that you have problems with your computer, but please read all ( on saying that you probably did, but chose to ignore it ) of the threads before you pass judgement! Oh by the way, welcome back!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2009 20:42:28 GMT
I couldn't agree more Pete, but I'm afraid that we belong to a generation who's acceptance of the reality of expectation is on a lot more realistic level than the evergrowing number of "we want success, and we want it now" merchants who are spoiling the party for me these days. .......they just don't seem to get it that the manager has so often to work with "flawed" goods when taking on players who have failed to establish themselves at a higher level. Let me sign up to the Old Farts Club by nodding in agreement with these comments (and, of course, those of Pete's). I've highlighted the words "spoiling the party" because that's how I feel sometimes. Sadly, there are occasions when I dread discussing Torquay United because I know precisely where the conversation is going. I mean Paul Buckle must be to blame for everything, mustn't he? Aldershot getting 101 points last year - which may have been significant in us not winning the championship? - sort it out, Bucks! Burton still being on course for 95+ points...it's an outrage! Let me also drag up three paragraphs from deep within a recent posting of Jon's which contain plenty of pertinent insights: Funnily enough, I firmly believe that having a more circumspect and low-profile Chairman / Board actually heaps more pressure on the manager – although I am sure that is not the intention. MB was a lightning rod for all negativity / abuse / pet theories / unrealistic expectations and effectively that saved the managers under him from the brunt of this. Now we have what few would argue is the perfect Boardroom setup, so who in this world of “blame culture” is responsible for us not walking this pub league? It’s got to be Buckle’s fault, hasn’t it? Buckle is unique amongst TUFC managers since 1927 in that he is in charge of a club which is in the upper quartile of the league it is in terms of crowds, resources and realistic expectation levels. That means that he can realistically be expected to deliver a place in the top six of the league. Just about every other manager since 1927 has been in the lower quartile of the league it is in terms of crowds, resources and realistic expectation levels. That means that bottom six was a realistic expectation - anything else was a bonus. Well said, that man, especially the point about the club now being in the upper quartile of the league with respect to crowds, resources, etc. The 2007 takeover seemed to be accompanied by a widespread belief that we were now by far - if you were to listen to some observers - the richest, biggest club in this league. I dared to speculate on this myself but what did I know of the finances of other clubs in our league? Bugger all to be honest. And, anyway, if there's any truth in money guaranteeing success you've got to be significantly richer than your rivals. Consequently I think Jon is correct - at current prices - in going no further than his top 25% verdict. Another point to make is the sudden importance of requiring to be champions in order to guarantee promotion. That's a massive culture shock, isn't it? In the top four tiers the championship only really, really matters in the Premiership. In the other three divisions it's a lovely bonus with the real aim being automatic promotion. It's particularly difficult for us coming from a division where there is a more generous allocation of promotion places than in any other league (something which came about in the horse trading that accompanied the creation of the national Division Four in 1958). I would imagine there are very few clubs - in any league - which can expect to win a championship. This season I would have expected Truro to win their league because they are incredibly wealthy in a poverty-stricken division. Well, they probably will do but it's not been the cakewalk they anticipated. Leicester in Lge 1? They haven't yet - and was it ever an absolute given? I think not. On balance I'm a purist when it comes to promotion. I'd scrap the play-offs and promote the best two, three, four teams or whatever. However, I realised that from the day I saw one of the earliest play-off games - Oldham v Leeds in 1987 - I was captivated by the whole occasion and that the bloody things were here to stay (and I've since enjoyed many as a neutral). I appreciate it's an old argument but we know we could be runners-up by a country mile - and win the play-off semi-final handsomely - but still not get promoted. We also understand we could squeeze into the play-offs and win both the semi-final and final on penalties. The very fact we need to win the championship to ensure promotion may be distorting our view of how we feel the club is progressing. It's completely hypothetical but - even if it was two-up automatically - I reckon we'd be so much more optimistic and satisfied. Three-up automatically and we'd probably be very confident of promotion sooner rather than later. That, in my opinion, is a testimony to the state of the club at the moment and I'm not sure how many other clubs could say the same. Cambridge perhaps?
|
|
|
Post by Budleigh on Apr 3, 2009 11:25:10 GMT
Absolutely agree.... We're in a very difficult league and automatic promotion requires winning the championship. We've no experience of how to do that not ever having won such like since joining the league in '27.. And before anyone says it, we did win the Southern League Western Section in 1926/27 as a non-league side but that is considerably different to winning the Conference now. We are effectively in league five, not non-league as such. This is actually as good a league performance as we've had bar one or two others in the mists of time...
|
|
Fonda
TFF member
Talking absolute football...
Posts: 384
|
Post by Fonda on Apr 3, 2009 12:00:02 GMT
Absolutely agree.... We're in a very difficult league and automatic promotion requires winning the championship. We've no experience of how to do that not ever having won such like since joining the league in '27.. And before anyone says it, we did win the Southern League Western Section in 1926/27 as a non-league side but that is considerably different to winning the Conference now. We are effectively in league five, not non-league as such. This is actually as good a league performance as we've had bar one or two others in the mists of time... I disagree. It's all relative isn't it. It's not as simple as looking at the table, seeing us in the top 3 or 4 and suggesting that's better than others managed. The circumstances at the club currently are very different to what they were during the Webb/Bateson regimes certainly, so direct comparison is impossible.
|
|